Skip to main content

Intraoperative Evaluation of Colorectal Specimens Containing Cancer

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 893 Accesses

Part of the book series: Frozen Section Library ((FROZEN,volume 4))

Abstract

Intraoperative assessment of colon cancer resection specimens may influence immediate surgical management. Indications for evaluation include determining the depth of invasion, presence of serosal penetration, status of margins, and intactness of the mesorectum, when present. Pathologists may also be asked to identify residual carcinoma in neoadjuvantly treated patients, or document the presence of other lesions, such as adenomas, polypectomy sites, or underlying colitis. Estimating the depth of invasion into the colonic wall is best achieved by macroscopic examination in combination with frozen section analysis, whereas detecting serosal involvement may require touch or scrape preparations of the serosal surface. Assessment of margins is most challenging in rectal specimens, particularly when patients have received neoadjuvant therapy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Jemal A, Siegal R, Ward E, et al (2008) Cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 58(2):71–96

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Washington MK, Berlin J, Branton P, et al (2009) Protocol for the examination of specimens from patients with primary carcinomas of the colon and rectum. Arch Pathol Lab Med 133:1539–1551

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Burroughs SH, Williams GT (2000) Examination of large intestine resection specimens. J Clin Pathol 53:344–349

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Terry MB, Neugut AI, Bostick RM, Potter JD, Haile RW, Fenoglio-Preiser CM (2002) Reliability in the classification of advanced colorectal adenomas. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 11(7):660–663

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ramirez M, Scherling S, Papaconstantinou HT, Scott TJ (2008) Management of the malignant polyp. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 21(4): 286–290

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Yantiss RK, Bosenberg MW, Antonioli DA, and Odze RD (2002) Utility of MMP-1, p53, E-cadherin, and collagen IV immunohistochemical stains in the differential diagnosis of adenomas with misplaced epithelium versus adenomas with invasive adenocarcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol 26(2):206–215

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Shepherd NA, Baxter KJ, Love SB (1997) The prognostic importance of peritoneal involvement in colonic cancer: a prospective evaluation. Gastroenterology 112(4):1096–1102

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Scott KW, Grace RH (1989) Detection of lymph node metastases in colorectal carcinoma before and after fat clearance. Br J Surg 76(11): 1165–1167

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Hughes TG, Jenevein EP, Poulos E (1983) Intramural spread of colon carcinoma. A pathologic study. Am J Surg 46(3):697–699

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Luna-Perez P, Huelga AR, Coria DFR, Medrano R, Macouzet JG (1990) Usefulness of frozen section examination in resected mid-rectal cancer after preoperative radiation. Am J Surg 159(6):582–584

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kapiteijn E, Marijnen CA, Nagtegaal ID, et al (2005) Preoperative radiotherapy combined with total mesorectal excision for resectable rectal cancer. N Engl J Med 345(9):638–646

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Salerno G, Daniels IR, Moran BJ, Wotherspoon A, Brown G (2006) Clarifying margins in the multidisciplinary management of rectal cancer: the MERCURY experience. Clin Radiol 61(11):916–923

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Wasserberg N, Gutman H (2008) Resection margins in modern rectal cancer surgery. J Surg Oncol 98(8):611–615

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Arbman G, Nilsson E, Hallböök O, Sjödahl R (1996) Local recurrence following total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Eur J Surg 162(11):899–904

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Nagtegaal ID, vandeVeld CJ, vanderWorp E, Kapiteijn E, Quirke P, van Krieken JH (2002) Macroscopic evaluation of rectal cancer resection specimens: clinical significance of the pathologist in quality control. J Clin Oncol 20(7):1729–1734

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hermanek P, Junginger T (2005) The circumferential resection margin in rectal carcinoma. Tech Coloproctol 9(3):193–200

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nicole C. Panarelli .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Panarelli, N.C., Yantiss, R.K. (2010). Intraoperative Evaluation of Colorectal Specimens Containing Cancer. In: Frozen Section Library: Appendix, Colon, and Anus. Frozen Section Library, vol 4. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6584-4_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6584-4_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-6583-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-6584-4

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics