Advertisement

Self-Confidence and Academic Achievements in Primary-School Children: Their Relationships and Links to Parental Bonds, Intelligence, Age, and Gender

  • Sabina Kleitman
  • Tanya Moscrop
Chapter

Abstract

The construct of metacognition is well-established in psychology and education disciplines, yet much is still unknown. One method receiving well-deserved popularity is by using confidence ratings assigned immediately after a cognitive act to study regulative aspects of metacognition. Prior research has demonstrated evidence of the stable and reliable construct of self-confidence in adults. However, no studies examined the existence of self-confidence among primary school children and its predictive validity within a school environment. In this chapter we present the results of a study that examined the existence of self-confidence in children aged 9–12 years (N = 183). The students also completed a brief-current form of the Parental Bonding Instrument to gauge their perceptions of the level of parental care and overprotection, within the parent-child relationship. Standardised school grades and fluid intelligence scores were also collected. The results from this study demonstrated the existence of self-confidence in primary school children and determined its importance for school achievement, irrespective of a student’s cognitive ability, age and gender. The results also suggest that parental care has an important influence on both school achievement and levels of confidence.

Keywords

Academic Achievement Maternal Care Confidence Rating Accuracy Score Parental Overprotection 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Alexander, J. M., Carr, M., & Schwanenflugel, P. J. (1995). Development of metacognition in gifted children: Directions for future research. Developmental Review, 15, 1–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allwood, C. M., & Granhag, P. A. (1999). Feelings of confidence and the realism of confidence judgements in everyday life. In P. Juslin & H. Montgomery (Eds.), Judgement and decision making: Neo-Brunswikian and process-tracing approaches (pp. 123–146). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  3. Allwood, C. M., Granhag, P. A., & Jonsson, A. C. (2006). Child witnesses’ metamemory realism. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 47, 461–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Amato, P. R. (1993). Children’s adjustment to divorce: Theories, hypotheses, and empirical support. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 55(1), 23–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Arbuckle, J. L. (2006). AMOS 7.0 users guide. Chicago, IL: SPSS Inc.Google Scholar
  6. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.Google Scholar
  7. Barber, B. K. (1996). Parental psychological control: Revisiting a neglected construct. Child Development, 67(6), 3296–3319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bean, R. A., Bush, K. R., McKearney, P. C., & Wilson, S. M. (2003). The impact of parental support, behavioral control, and psychological control on the academic achievement and self-esteem of African American and European adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Research, 18, 523–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Berk, L. E. (2003). Child development (6th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  10. Board of Studies of New South Wales. (2003). Stages 4 and 5 mathematics syllabus. Sydney, Australia: Board of Studies of New South Wales.Google Scholar
  11. Board of Studies of New South Wales. (2007). Common Grade Scale K-6. Retrieved 05/02/2007 from the World Wide Web http://arc.boardofstudies.nsw.edu.au/go/k-6/common-grade-scale/.
  12. Bowlby, J. (1970). Disruption of affectional bonds and its effects on behaviour. Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy, 2(2), 75–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bowlby, J. (2005). The making and breaking of affectional bonds. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Brown, J. D. (1986). Evaluation of self and others: Self-enhancement bias in social judgements. Social Cognition, 4, 353–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Butler, D. L., & Winne, P. H. (1995). Feedback and self-regulated learning: A theoretical synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 65(3), 245–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Byrne, B. M. (2001). Structural equation modelling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  17. Carroll, J. B. (1993). Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor analytical studies. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Clarke, D. (1990). Verbal uncertainty expressions: A critical review of two decades of research. Current Psychology, 9(3), 203–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Diener, M. L., Isabella, R. A., Behunin, M. G., & Wong, M. S. (2007). Attachment to mothers and fathers during middle childhood: Associations with child gender, age, and competence. Social Development, 17(1), 84–101.Google Scholar
  20. Efklides, A., & Tsiora, A. (2002). Metacognitive experiences, self-concept, and self-regulation. Psychologia: An International Journal of Psychology in the Orient, 45, 222–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34, 906–911.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Flavell, J. H., Miller, P. H., & Miller, S. A. (1993). Cognitive development (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  23. Geary, D. C. (2006). Gender differences in mathematics: An integrative psychological approach. British Journal of Educational Studies, 54(2), 245–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gigerenzer, G., Hoffrage, U., & Kleinbolting, H. (1991). Probabilistic mental models – A Brunswikian theory of confidence. Psychological Review, 98(4), 506–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Harvey, N. (1997). Confidence in judgment. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 1(2), 78–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Higgins, E. T., & Silberman, I. (1998). Development of regulatory focus: Promotion and prevention as ways of living. In J. Heckhausen & C. S. Dweck (Eds.), Motivation and self-regulation across life span (pp. 78–113). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Horn, J. L., & Noll, J. (1994). A system for understanding cognitive abilities: A theory and the evidence on which it is based. In D. K. Detterman (Ed.), Current topics in human intelligence (Vol. IV, pp. 151–203). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  28. Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modelling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 1–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ingram, R. E., Overbey, T., & Fortier, M. (2001). Individual differences in dysfunctional automatic thinking and parental bonding: Specificity of maternal care. Personality and Individual Differences, 30, 401–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Jonsson, A. C., & Allwood, C. M. (2003). Stability and variability in the realism of confidence judgments over time, content domain, and gender. Personality and Individual Differences, 34(4), 559–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Juslin, P. (1994). The overconfidence phenomenon as a consequence of informal experimenter-guided selection of almanac items. Organizational Behaviour & Human Decision Processes, 57(2), 226–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kleitman, S. (2008). Metacognition in the rationality debate: Self-confidence and its calibration. Saarbücken, Germany: VDM.Google Scholar
  33. Kleitman, S., & Moscrop, T. (2009). Metacognitive self-monitoring and academic achievements in primary-school children: Their relationships and links to parental bonds, intelligence, age and gender. Manuscript in preparation.Google Scholar
  34. Kleitman, S., & Stankov, L. (2001). Ecological and person-oriented aspects of metacognitive processes in test taking. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 15, 321–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kleitman, S., & Stankov, L. (2007). Self-confidence and metacognitive processes. Learning and Individual Differences, 17(2), 161–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Klimidis, S., Minas, I. H., & Ata, A. W. (1992a). The PBI-BC: A brief current form of the Parental Bonding Instrument for adolescent research. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 33(6), 374–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Klimidis, S., Minas, I. H., & Ata, A. W. (1992b). Construct validation in adolescents of the brief current form of the Parental Bonding Instrument. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 33(6), 378–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kröner, S., & Bierman, A. (2007). The relationship between confidence and self-concept – Towards a model of response confidence. Intelligence, 35, 580–590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Little, R. J. A., & Rubin, D. B. (1989). The analysis of social-science data with missing values. Sociological Methods and Research, 18(2–3), 292–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Marsh, H., & Kleitman, S. (2002). Extracurricular school activities: The good, the bad, and the nonlinear. Harvard Educational Review, 72(4), 464–514.Google Scholar
  41. Marsh, H. W., Balla, J. R., & McDonald, R. P. (1988). Goodness-of-fit indexes in confirmatory factor analysis: The effect of sample size. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 391–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Metcalfe, J., & Shimamura, A. P. (Eds.). (1994). Metacognition: Knowing about knowing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  43. Miller, P., & Weiss, M. G. (1982). Children and adults knowledge about what variables affect selective attention. Child Development, 53, 543–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Moore, D. A., & Healy, P. J. (2008). The trouble with overconfidence. Psychological Review, 115(2), 502–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Moss, E., & St-Laurent, D. (2001). Attachment at school age and academic performance. Developmental Psychology, 37(6), 863–874.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Nelson, T. O., & Narens, L. (1994). Why investigate metacognition? In J. Metcalfe & A. P. Shimamura (Eds.), Metacognition: Knowing about knowing (pp. 1–25). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  47. New South Wales Department of Education. (2003). Opportunity class sample tests, 2001; 2002; 2003. Retrieved 05/02/2007 from http://www.schools.nsw.edu.au/learning/k-6assessments/oc_sampletest.php.
  48. New South Wales Department of Education. (2007). Department of Education and Training Regions for New South Wales. Retrieved 05/02/2007 from http://www.nsw.edu.au.
  49. Pallier, G., Wilkinson, R., Danthir, V., Kleitman, S., Knezevic, G., Stankov, L., & Roberts, R. D. (2002). The role of individual differences in the accuracy of confidence judgements. The Journal of Educational Psychology, 129(3), 257–299.Google Scholar
  50. Parker, G. (1983). Parental overprotection: A risk factor in psychosocial development. New York: Grune & Stratton.Google Scholar
  51. Parker, G. (1990). The parental bonding instrument: A decade of research. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 25, 281–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Parker, G., Tupling, H., & Brown, L. B. (1979). A parental bonding instrument. British Journal of Medical Psychology, 52, 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Pintrinch, P. R., & de Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivation and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 33–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Pomeranz, E. M., & Ruble, D. N. (1998). The multidimensional nature of control: Implications for the development of sex differences in self-evaluation. In J. Heckhausen & C. S. Dweck (Eds.), Motivation and self-regulation across life span (pp. 159–184). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Raven, J. C. (1938). Progressive matrices: A perceptual test of intelligence. London: Lewis.Google Scholar
  56. Raven, J., Raven, J. C., & Court, J. H. (2003). Manual for Raven’s Progressive Matrices and Vocabulary Scales. Section 1: General overview. San Antonio, TX: Harcourt Assessment.Google Scholar
  57. Roebers, C. M., & Howie, P. (2003) Confidence judgments in event recall: Developmental progression in the impact of question format. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 85(4), 352–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Schraw, G., & Dennison, R. S. (1994). Assessing metacognitive awareness. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 19(4), 460–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Schraw, G., & Moshman, D. (1995). Metacognitive theories. Educational Psychology Review, 7(4), 351–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Schraw, G., Crippen, K. J., & Hartley, K. (2006). Promoting self-regulation in science education: Metacognition as part of a broader perspective on learning. Research Science Education, 36(1–2), 111–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Schwarz, S., & Roebers, C. M. (2006). Age differences in the effects of social influence on children’s eyewitness performance and their metacognitive monitoring. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 94, 229–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Stankov, L. (1999). Mining on the “no man’s land” between intelligence and personality. In P. L. Ackerman, P. C. Kyllonen, & R. D. Roberts (Eds.), Learning and individual differences: Process, trait, and content determinants (pp. 315–367). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Stankov, L. (2000). Complexity, metacognition, and fluid intelligence. Intelligence, 28(2), 121–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Stankov, L., & Crawford, J. D. (1996). Age differences in the realism of confidence judgements: A calibration study using tests of fluid and crystallized intelligence. Learning and Individual Differences, 8(2), 83–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Stankov, L., & Kleitman, S. (2008). Processes on the borderline between cognitive abilities and personality: Confidence and its realism. In G. J. Boyle, G. Matthews, & D. Saklofske (Eds.), The handbook of personality theory and testing (pp. 541–555). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  66. Van IJzendoorn, M. H., Dijkstra, J., & Bus, A. G. (1995). Attachment, intelligence, and language: A meta-analysis. Social Development, 4(2), 115–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Veenman, M. V. J., & Spaans, M. A. (2005). Relation between intellectual and metacognitive skills: Age and task differences. Learning and Individual Differences, 15, 159–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Veenman, M. V. J., Wilhelm, P., & Beishuizen, J. J. (2004). The relation between intellectual and metacognitive skills from a developmental perspective. Learning and Instruction, 14(1), 89–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Want, J., & Kleitman, S. (2006). Imposter phenomenon and self-handicapping: Links with parenting styles and self-confidence. Personality and Individual Differences, 40(5), 961–971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Zimmerman, B. J. (1990). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: An overview. Educational Psychologist, 25(1), 3–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of PsychologyThe University of SydneySydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations