E-government in New Zealand: Local Governments, Digital Divides and the National Digital Strategy

  • Kay Fielden
  • Pam Malcolm
Part of the Integrated Series in Information Systems book series (ISIS, volume 25)


Research carried out in 2009 on New Zealand’s local government e-readiness with respect to the national digital strategy has discovered that there is a wide maturity range. In the first part of this chapter, an e-readiness maturity model is presented that indicates to what extent local governments, both urban and rural have met the national strategy guidelines. These results are contextualised within the international literature on local e-government maturity.

In the second part of this chapter, challenges for four diverse and marginalised user groups are considered. Factors that affect end-users in New Zealand include: inequitable infrastructure provision, a shift in emphasis and ownership of technical knowledge and skills required to gain access to government services, and the differences in benefits and challenges for both majority and minority end-user groups. This analysis has been embedded in a theoretical framework informed by social informatics (Sawyer, 2005), digital inclusion/exclusion models (Cushman & McLean, 2008), boundary conditioning modelling (Cordoba & Midgley, 2008) and an e-government to e-governance model proposed by Dawes (2008).


Local Government Intellectual Disability City Council Regional Council Digital Divide 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Arch, A. (2008). Web accessibility for older users: A literature review. Web Accessibility Initiative: Ageing Education and Harmonisation (WAI-AGE) European Commission Project, 6th Framework, IST 035015. Retrieved May 26, 2008, from
  2. Asgarkhani, M. (2007). The reality of social inclusion through digital government. Journal of Technology in Human Services, 25(1/2), 127–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bailey, S., Barrett, S., & Guilford, S. (2005). Older users’ interaction with Websites. Paper presented at the British HCI 2005 – HCI and the Older Population, Napier University, Edinburgh. Retrieved September 15, 2008, from
  4. Becker, S. -A. (2004). A study of web usability for older adults seeking online health resources. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 11(4), 387–406. Retrieved June 6, 2008, from doi:
  5. Bell, A., Billot, J., Crothers, C., Goodwin, I., Kripalani, K., Sherman, K., et al. (2008). World Internet Project. International comparisons 2008: Highlights from a New Zealand perspective. Auckland: Institute of Culture, Discourse and Communication: AUT University. Retrieved June 5, 2009, from Google Scholar
  6. Bulger, M. (2006). Beyond search: A preliminary skill set for online literacy. Santa Barbara: University of California. retrieved March 9, 2009.Google Scholar
  7. Chisnell, D., & Redish, J. (2005). Designing web sites for older adults: Expert review of usability for older adults at 50 web sites. Washington DC: Retrieved May 26, 2008, from
  8. Cordoba, J. -R., & Midgley, G. (2008). Beyond organisational agendas: using boundary critique to facilitate the inclusion of societal concerns in information systems planning. European Journal of Information Systems, 17, 125–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Crang, M., Crosbie, T., & Graham, S. (2006). Variable geometries of connection: Urban digital divides and the uses of information technology. Urban Studies, 43(13), 2551–2570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cullen, R., & Hernon, P. (2004). Wired for well-being: Citizens’ response to e-government. Retrieved October 3, 2008, from
  11. Curtis, C., Vowles, J., & Curtis, B. (2004). Channel-surfing: How New Zealanders access government. Wellington: State Services Commission. accessed 2 June 2008.Google Scholar
  12. Cushman, M., & McLean, R. (2008). Exclusion, inclusion and changing the face of information systems research. Information Technology & People, 21(3), 8. Retrieved September 30, 2008, from CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dahlberg, L. (2007). “Do-it yourself” digital citizenship: A preliminary interrogation. New Zealand Sociology, 222(1), 104–222.Google Scholar
  14. Dawes, S. C. (2008). Governance in the information age: a research framework for an uncertain future. Paper presented at the 9th Annual International Digital Government Research Conference, Montreal.Google Scholar
  15. Dickinson, A., Smith, M. J., Arnott, J. L., Newell, A. F., & Hill, R. L. (2007). Approaches to web search and navigation for older computer novices. Paper presented at the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, San Jose, California, USA.Google Scholar
  16. Digital Strategy Advisory Group. (2005). Setting the scene: ICT and New Zealand. Retrieved May 22, 2008, from
  17. Doesburg, A. (2008). Bringing government services to the iPod generation. New Zealand Herald. Retrieved March 6, 2009, from
  18. Dutton, W. H., & Peltu, M. (2007). Reconfiguring government–public engagements: Enhancing the communicative power of citizens. Oxford Internet Institute. accessed 26 March 2009
  19. Fidgeon, T. (2006). Usability for older web users. Retrieved May 26, 2008, from
  20. Fox, S. (2004). Older Americans and the internet: Pew Internet. Retrieved September 16, 2008, from
  21. Griffin, P. (2006, March 10). Online census shows e-government here to stay. New Zealand Herald. Retrieved March 6, 2009, from
  22. Haas, A. (2006). Pieces of a whole. The big picture. Retrieved May 26, 2008, from
  23. Hafeez, S., & Waheed-Sher, S. (2005). UN global e-government readiness report 2005: From e-government to e-inclusion. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs Division for Public Administration and Development Management. Retrieved October 24, 2008, from
  24. Higgins, J. (1997). New Zealand local government online. Retrieved May 26, 2008, from
  25. Hill, R., Beynon-Davies, P., & Williams, M. D. (2008). Older people and internet engagement. Acknowledging social moderators of internet adoption, access and use. Information Technology & People, 21(3), 22. Retrieved September 30, 2008, from doi:10.1108/09593840810896019CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kurniawan, S., & Zaphiris, P. (2005). Research-derived web design guidelines for older people. Paper presented at the 7th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers and accessibility.Google Scholar
  27. Labour Market Policy Group. (2000). Closing the digital divide: What do we know about the digital divide in New Zealand? Retrieved July 2, 2008. from
  28. Legatt-Clark, C. (2007). Homelessness in New Zealand: A discussion and synthesis of research findings. Auckland, New Zealand: Methodist Mission Northern.Google Scholar
  29. Letch, N., & Carroll, J. (2008). Excluded again: implications of integrated e-government systems for those at the margins. Information Technology & People, 21(3), 16. Retrieved September 30, 2008, from CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lips, A. M. B. (2008). Before, After or During the Reforms? Towards Information Age Government in New Zealand. Policy Quarterly, 4(2), 21–26. Retrieved March 6, 2009, from Google Scholar
  31. Local Government New Zealand. (2008a). Councils in the digital age – A progress report on local government initiatives relating to the digital strategy. Retrieved May 26, 2008, from
  32. Local Government New Zealand. (2008b). Benchmarking New Zealand local e-government initiatives 20072008. Retrieved October, 8 2008, from
  33. Mansourian, Y. (2008). Web search efficacy: definition and implementation. Aslib Proceedings, 60(4), 14. Retrieved October 6, 2008, from CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Newell, A. F., Dickinson, A., Smith, M. J., & Gregor, P. (2006). Designing a portal for older users: A case study of an industrial/academic collaboration. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 13(3), 347–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Parkin, P., & Cullinan, J. (2008). A comparison of the information and service content of New Zealand council Websites. Retrieved October 8, 2008, from
  36. Peacey, B. (2002). E-government@ the local level – A discussion paper. Christchurch, New Zealand: University of Canterbury.Google Scholar
  37. Rubaii-Barrett, N., & Wise, L. R. (2008). Disability access and e-government: An empirical analysis of state practices. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 19(1), 52–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Ryall, T. (2009). Government shared network to be discontinued. Retrieved September 14, 2009, from
  39. Sanjeev, D., & Riggins, F. (2005). The digital divide: Current and future research directions. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 6(12), 298–336.Google Scholar
  40. Sawyer, S. (2005). Social informatics: Principles and opportunities. Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, June 2–6.
  41. Selwyn, N. (2004). The information aged: A qualitative study of older adults’ use of information and communications technology. Journal of Aging Studies, 18(4), 369–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Sloan, L. (2008, 14 May 2008). Council small print impedes disabled. Central Leader. Retrieved May 21, 2008, from
  43. State Services Commission. (2004). Achieving e-government 2004 – A report on the progress towards the New Zealand e-government strategy. Retrieved March 6, 2009, from
  44. State Services Commission. (2007a). New Zealand government web standards. Retrieved from
  45. State Services Commission. (2007b). NZ government web standards and recommendations v1.0. Retrieved from.Google Scholar
  46. State Services Commission. (2008a). NZ e-government interoperability framework. Retrieved May 25, 2008, from
  47. State Services Commission. (2008b). New Zealand e-government 2007: progress towards transformation. Retrieved March 6, 2009 from
  48. State Services Commission. (2009b). Beyond e-government – towards 2020. Retrieved September 15, 2009, from
  49. Statistics New Zealand. (2003). A portrait of health: Key results of the 2002/2003 health survey. Retrieved October 20, 2008, from
  50. Statistics New Zealand. (2004). Older New Zealanders – 65 and beyond. Retrieved May 29, 2008 from
  51. Statistics New Zealand. (2006a). Household use of information and communication technology. Retrieved August 26, 2008, from
  52. Statistics New Zealand. (2006b). Information and communication technology in New Zealand. Retrieved August 26, 2008, from
  53. Statistics New Zealand. (2007). Two-thirds of New Zealand homes online. Retrieved August 26, 2008, from
  54. Willis, S., & Tranter, B. (2006). Beyond the ’digital divide’: Internet diffusion and inequality in Australia. Journal of Sociology, 42(1), 43–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Unitec Institute of TechnologyAucklandNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations