Conceptualizing and Implementation of E-government in India

Part of the Integrated Series in Information Systems book series (ISIS, volume 25)


In the past decade there has been a significant surge in e-government-related activity in India. This is most noticeable the way e-government has been conceptualized in India in terms of its expected outcomes and delivery model; and also the way the government has gone about implementing e-government at national and sub-national levels. New initiatives with regard to national policies, programmes and agencies involved in the implementation have been undertaken and many are in the pipeline. Also a significant place for the private sector has been carved out with increasing number of e-government projects being implemented under public–private partnership modes. All these developments make the e-government scenario in India dynamic with progressively more number of stakeholders. At the same time and notwithstanding these developments, there are also many unique and formidable challenges that India faces with regard to e-government implementation. The chapter discusses the aforesaid issues with the objective of presenting a concise yet comprehensive summary of the state of art in e-government in India.


Private Public Partnership Ground Reality Impact Assessment Study Land Record Infrastructural Factor 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Bekkers, V. J. J. M., & Zouridis, S. (1999). Electronic service delivery in public administration: Some trends and issues. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 65(2), 183–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chen, Y., Chen, H. M., Ching, R. K. H., & Huang, W. W. (2006). Electronic government implementation: A comparison between developed and developing countries. International Journal of Electronic Government Research, 3(2), 45–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Dellis, A. (2007). Blame-game politics in a coalition government. Journal of Public Economics, 91(1–2), 77–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. DiCaterino, A., & Pardo, T. A. (1996). The world wide web as a universal interface to government services [internet]. Retrieved September 5, 2009, from
  5. DIT. (2009a). e-Governance initiatives across the country, Department of Information Technology (DIT) under the Ministry of Communications and Information Technology, Government of India [internet]. Retrieved September 10, 2009, from
  6. DIT. (2009b). Impact assessment of e-Government Projects, Department of Information Technology (DIT), Ministry of Communication & Information Technology, Government of India [Internet]. Retrieved September 10, 2009, from [accessed 23 September 2009]
  7. Ghere, R. K., & Young, B. A. (1998). The cyber-management environment: Where technology and ingenuity meet public purpose and accountability. Public Administration and Management: An Interactive Journal, 3(1).Google Scholar
  8. Gupta, M. P., & Jana, D. (2003). E-government evaluation: A framework and case study. Government Information Quarterly, 20, 366–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Heeks, R. (2001). Understanding e-governance for development. The University of Manchester, Institute for Development, Policy and Management Information, Systems, Technology and Government: Working Papers Series, Number 11/2001. Available at:
  10. Heeks, R. (2002). Information systems and developing countries: Failure, success, and local improvisations. The Information Society, 18, 101–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Heeks, R. (2003). e-Government in Africa: Promise and practice. Information Polity, 7(2–3), 97–114.Google Scholar
  12. Heeks, R., & Bhatnagar S. (1999). Understanding success and failure in information age reform. In R. Heeks (Ed.), Reinventing government in information age. London: Roultedge.Google Scholar
  13. Ho, A. (2002). Reinventing local government and the e-government initiative. Public Administration Review, 62(4), 434–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hwang, S. D., Choi, Y., & Myeong, S. H. (1999). Electronic government in South Korea: Conceptual problems. Government Information Quarterly, 16(3), 277–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jaeger, P. T., & Thompson, K. M. (2003). e-Government around the world, lessons, challenges and future directions. Government Information Quarterly, 20(4), 389–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lalor, J., & Brooke, G. (2002). Public private partnership opportunities in e-government. KPMG. Retrieved February 10, 2007, from /
  17. La Porte, T. M., De Jong, M., & Demchak, C. C. (1999). Public organizations on the world wide web: Empirical correlates of administrative openness. Available at:
  18. Maumbe, B. M., Owei, V., & Alexander, H. (2008). Questioning the pace and pathway of e-government development in Africa: A case study of South Africa’s Cape Gateway project. Government Information Quarterly, 25(4), 757–777.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Means, G., & Schneider, D. (2000). Meta-capitalism: The e-business revolution and the design of 21st century companies and markets. New York: John Wiley & Sons Inc.Google Scholar
  20. Mishra, D. C. (2006). Ten emerging e-government challenges today: The future may be sober and not hype. Proceedings of 4th International Conference on E-governance, December 15–17, 2006, New Delhi.Google Scholar
  21. McGregor, E. B., Jr. (2001). Web page accountability: The case of public schools. Paper Presented at the National Public Management Research Conference, Bloomington, IN.Google Scholar
  22. Moon, M. J. (2002). The evolution of e-Government among municipalities rhetoric or reality? Public Administration Review, 62(4), 424–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ndou, V. D. (2004). E-government for developing countries: Opportunities and challenges. EJISDC, 18(1), 1–24.Google Scholar
  24. Odedra-Straub, M. (2003). E-commerce and development: Whose development? EJISDC, 20(5), 1–5.Google Scholar
  25. Rieck, O., & Tung, L. L. (2005). Adoption of electronic government services among business organizations in Singapore. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 14, 417–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ryan, S., Prybutok, V. R., & Zhang, X. (2008). Evaluating leadership, IT quality, and net benefits in e-government environment. Information & Management, 45, 143–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Satyanarayana, J. (2008). Public Good through Private Partnership
  28. Sharma, S. (2007). Exploring best practices in public–private partnership (PPP) in e-Government through select Asian case studies. The International Information & Library Review, 39(3–4), 203–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Steyaert, J. C. (2004). Measuring the performance of electronic g government services. Information & Management, 41, 369–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Tan, M., & Teo, T. S. H. (1999). The diffusion of the internet in a pro-it cultural environment: A content analysis of the Singapore experience. Communications of the AIS, 2(21).Google Scholar
  31. Thomas, P. (2009). Gyan Ganga, e-governance and the right to information: ICTs and development in India. Telematics and Informatics, 26(1), 20–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. TRAI. (2007).Ten Year Achievement Report 2007. Telecom Regulation Authority of India, Available at
  33. Yildiz, M. (2007). E-government: Initiatives, developments, and issues. Government Information Quarterly, 24, 646–665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Zarei, B., Ghapanchi, A., & Sattary, B. (2008). Toward national e-government development models for developing countries: A nine-stage model. The International information & Library Review, 40(3).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Xavier Institute of ManagementBhubaneswarIndia

Personalised recommendations