Framework of E-governance at the Local Government Level

  • Hakikur Rahman
Part of the Integrated Series in Information Systems book series (ISIS, volume 25)


E-government theories are prevailing in various formats and concepts around the globe, nations, and institutions, but not many examples to emulate in terms of developing a comprehensive framework of e-governance system at the outer periphery of the government tiers. This research would like to carry out a comprehensive analysis on various theories built around the e-governance concept, but the prime focus will be devoted to penetration of e-government system at the grass roots. To narrow down further, the study will conduct analytical observations in a few developed, developing, and transitional economies. Furthermore, to be more concise, the research will specifically focus on e-government implementations at the grass roots that penetrated the lowest tier of the governance system for community empowerment and knowledge enhancement. Before conclusion, it will try to put forward prospective research agenda, including framework of a future e-government system at the local government level.


Local Government Grass Root Information Infrastructure Government System Local Government Level 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Anttiroiko, A. (2004). Towards citizen-centered local e-government: The case of the city of Tampere. In M. Khosrow-Pour (Ed.), Annals of cases on information technology (Vol. 6, pp. 371–388). Hershey, PA: Idea Group PublishingGoogle Scholar
  2. Austin City Council (2008). Audit report 2008: City of Austin’s e-government initiative. Office of the City Auditor, Austin, Texas.Google Scholar
  3. Beardsley, S., von Morgenstern, I. B., Enriquez, L., & Verbeke, W. (2004). Towards a new regulatory compact. The global information technology report 2003–2004: Towards an equitable information society. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 71–86.Google Scholar
  4. Berg, L. van den, Meer, A. van der, Winden, W. van & Woets, P. (2006). E-governance in European and South African cities: The cases of Barcelona, Cape Town, Eindhoven, Johannesburg, Manchester, Tampere, The Hague, and Venice, Ashgate Publishing, Ltd., 2006Google Scholar
  5. Bovaird, T. (2003). e-Government and e-Governance: Organisational Implications, Options and Dilemmas. Public Policy and Administration, 18(2), 37–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Calista, D. J., & Melitski, J. (2007). e-Government and e-Governance: converging constructs of public sector information and communications technologies. Public Administration Quarterly, 31(1), 87–120.Google Scholar
  7. Chadwick, A. (2003). Bringing E-democracy back. In: Why it matters for future research on e-governance. Social Science Computer Review, 21(4), 443–455.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chauhan, R. (2009). National E-Governance Plan in India, UNU-IIST. Chutimaskul, W., & Chongsuphajaisiddhi, V. (2004). A framework for developing local e-government. In M. A. Wimmer (Ed.), Proceedings of Knowledge Management in Electronic Government: 5th IFIP International Working Conference, KMGov 2004, Krems, Austria, May 17–19, pp. 319–324.Google Scholar
  9. Commonwealth (2004). Commonwealth local government handbook: Modernisation, Council Structures, Finance, E-Government, Local Democracy, Partnerships, Representation, Commonwealth Local Government Forum, Commonwealth Secretariat, 2004.Google Scholar
  10. CPSI (2005). Local Governance and ICTs Research Network for Africa, LOG-IN Africa, COUNTRY REPORT – SOUTH AFRICA, Produced for the LOG-IN Africa Project Planning, Compiled by: Centre for Public Service Innovation (CPSI) and the LINK Centre, University of the Witwatersrand, Nairobi, Kenya.Google Scholar
  11. CTG (2002). New foundations: Annual Report 2002, Center for Technology in Government, University at Albany, State University of New York.Google Scholar
  12. CTG (2003). Annual Report 2003, Center for Technology in Government, University at Albany, State University of New York.Google Scholar
  13. Das, S. R., & Chandrashekhar, R. (2006). List of Asia Pacific e-government case studies, UNDP-APDIP.Google Scholar
  14. Fox, W. F., & Gurley, T. (2006). Will Consolidation Improve Sub-National Governments? World Bank Policy Research Working Paper WPS3913, May 2006, World Bank, Washington DC.Google Scholar
  15. Fukao, M. (1995). Financial integration, corporate governance, and the performance of multinational companies. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
  16. Gessi, T., Ramnarine, D., & Wilkins, J. (2007). Introducing a new e-governance framework in the commonwealth: from theory to practice, Hong Kong journals online. The Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration, 29(2), 1–21.Google Scholar
  17. Government of Bangladesh (2002). National Information and Communication Technology (ICT) Policy (October: 2002), Ministry of Science and Information & Communication Technology, Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh.Google Scholar
  18. Government of India (2000). The Information Technology Act, 2000 (No. 21 OF 2000). Ministry of Law, Justice and Company Affairs (Legislative Department), New Delhi, India.Google Scholar
  19. Government of Pakistan (2000). IT Policy and Action Plan, IT & Telecommunications Division, Ministry of Science & Technology, Government of Pakistan, Islamabad.Google Scholar
  20. Government of Pakistan (2005). E-Government Strategy and 5-Year Plan for the Federal Government, Electronic Government Directorate, Ministry of IT, Pakistan.Google Scholar
  21. Government of Singapore (1989). Based on information from Singapore, Ministry of Communications and Information, Information Division, Singapore, 1989, 53–63.Google Scholar
  22. Government of S. Korea (2006). E-Government for participation and inclusion in Korea, E-government headquarters, MOGHA, Republic of Korea.Google Scholar
  23. Hoogwout, M. (2003). Super pilots, subsidizing or self-organization: stimulating e-government initiatives in Dutch local governments. In R. Traunmüller (Ed.), Proceedings of Electronic Government: Second International Conference, EGOV 2003, Prague, Czech Republic, September 1–5, 2003, Springer: pp. 85–90.Google Scholar
  24. Inter-American Development Bank (2006). Multiphase Program for the Strengthening of Chile’s Digital Strategy, Report # CH-L1001, Document of the Inter-American Development Bank, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  25. James, A. J. (2004) “India’s Sector Reform Projects and Swajaldhara Programme,” case study prepared for the IRC International Water and Sanitation Centre, Delft, the Netherlands, available at
  26. Kim, H. -K. (2002). e-Government in Korea, a presentation from the National Computerization Agency, KoreaGoogle Scholar
  27. Kolsaker, A. (2005). Third way e-government: The case for local devolution. In M. H. Böhlen, J. Gamper, W. Polasek, & M. A. Wimmer (Eds.), Proceedings of E-Government: Towards Electronic Democracy : International Conference, TCGOV 2005 Bolzano, Italy, March 2–4, 2005, Springer: pp. 70–80.Google Scholar
  28. Labelle, R. (2005). ICT Policy Formulation and e-Strategy Development: A Comprehensive Guidebook. United Nations Development Programme-Asia Pacific Development Information Programme (UNDP-APDIP) – 2005, Reed Elsevier India Private Limited.Google Scholar
  29. Lallana, E. C. (2004). An Overview of ICT Policies and e-Strategies of Select Asian Economies. United Nations Development Programme-Asia Pacific Development Information Programme (UNDP-APDIP) – 2004, Reed Elsevier India Private Limited.Google Scholar
  30. Lalovic, K., Djukanovic, Z., & Zivkovic, J. (2004). Building the ICT fundament for local E-government in Serbia- Municipality of Loznica example, In M. Schrenk (Ed.), Proceedings of the 9th International Symposium on Planning and IT, Vienna, Austria.Google Scholar
  31. Malhotra, C., Chariar, V. M., Das, L. K., & Ilavarasan, P. V. (2007). An evaluatory framework for ICT interventions in the rural areas: Review of literature on e-governance for rural development in the Indian context. In G. P. Sahu (Ed.), Adopting e-Governance (pp. 216–226). New Delhi: GIFT Publishing.Google Scholar
  32. McNabb, D. E. (2006). Knowledge management in the public sector: A blueprint for innovation in government. M. E. Sharpe, 2006.Google Scholar
  33. MDL (2006). Local Government structure and efficiency, a report prepared for local government new Zealand. McKinlay Douglas Limited, New Zealand.Google Scholar
  34. Misra, D. C. (2008). Emerging e-government challenges: Past imperfect, present tense but future promising. A presentation at the 4th International Conference on E-government, Indian Institute of Technology, Delhi.Google Scholar
  35. Nour, M. A., AbdelRahman, A., & Fadlalla, A. (2008). A context-based integrative framework for e-government initiatives. Government Information Quarterly, 25, 448–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. OECD (2007a). Turkey: OECD E-government Studies, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2007Google Scholar
  37. OECD (2007b). Hungary: OECD E-government Studies, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2007Google Scholar
  38. Open Society Institute (2007). ICT for Local Government Handbook, Local Government and Public Service Reform Initiative. Open Society Institute, Budapest.Google Scholar
  39. Pacific Council (2002). Roadmap for E-government in the Developing World: 10 Questions E-government leaders Should Ask Themselves, The Working Group report on E-government in the Developing World, Pacific Council on International Policy, CA.Google Scholar
  40. Perotti, E. C. & von Thadden, E. -L. (2006, March). Corporate governance and the distribution of wealth: A political-economy perspective. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 162(1), 204–217(14), Mohr Siebeck.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Pertrazzini, B. A., & Harindranath, G. (1997). Information infrastructure initiative in emerging economies: The case of India. In B. Kahin & E. J. Wilson III (Eds.), National Information Infrastructure Initiatives (p. 220). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  42. Rahman, H. (2007). Role of ICTs in socioeconomic development and poverty reduction. In H. Rahman (Ed.), Information and communication technologies for economic and regional developments (pp. 180–219). Hershey, PA: Idea Group Inc.Google Scholar
  43. Rahman, H. (Ed.). (2008). An overview on strategic ICT implementations toward developing knowledge societies. In Developing Successful ICT Strategies: Competitive Advantages in a Global Knowledge-Driven Society (pp. 1–39). Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference.Google Scholar
  44. Rahman, H. (Ed.). (2009). Local e-government management: A wider window of e-governance. In Handbook of research on e-government readiness for information and service exchange: Utilizing progressive information communication technologies (pp. 295–323). Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference.Google Scholar
  45. Rainford, S. (2006). e-Sri Lanka: An integrated approach to e-government case study, a report of the ICT Agency of Sri Lanka.Google Scholar
  46. Samarajiva, R., & Zainudeen, A. (Eds.). (2008). ICT Infrastructure in Emerging Asia: Policy and Regulatory Roadblocks. London: SAGE Publications & IDRC.Google Scholar
  47. Sayo, P., Chacko, J. G., & Pradhan, G. (Eds.). (2004). ICT Policies and e-Strategies in the Asia-Pacific: A critical assessment of the way forward, United Nations Development Programme-Asia Pacific Development Information Programme (UNDP-APDIP) – 2004, Reed Elsevier India Private Limited.Google Scholar
  48. Shackleton, P., Fisher, J., & Dawson, L. (2004). E-Government services: One local government’s approach. In H. Linger et al. (Eds.), Constructing the infrastructure for the knowledge economy: Methods and tools, theory and practice. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  49. Sharma, S. K., & Gupta, J. N. D. (2003, October–December). Building blocks of an e-government – a framework. Journal of Electronic Commerce in Organizations, 1(4), 1–15.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Sin, C. Y. (2007). Foundation of effective e-government: The Singapore experience, Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs (BCSIA), John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University.Google Scholar
  51. Tan, P. (2006). ICA Country Report: Singapore e-Government, iGov2010: From integrating services to integrating government, Infocomm Development Authority of Singapore.Google Scholar
  52. Turner, T. J. (2004). Local government e-disclosure & comparisons: Equipping deliberative democracy for the 21st century, University Press of America, 2004Google Scholar
  53. UN (2008). United Nations e-Government Survey 2008: From e-government to connected governance, United Nations, NY.Google Scholar
  54. Wasukira, E., & Naigambi, W. (2002). Report on the Usage of ICT in Local Governments in Uganda, IICD, Canada.Google Scholar
  55. Waseda (2009). 2009 WASEDA University e-Government Ranking, Waseda University Institute of e-Government, Waseda University, Tokyo, Japan.Google Scholar
  56. Wong, P. -K. (1996), Implementing the NII vision: Singapore’s experience and future challenges. In B. Kahin & E. Wilson (Eds.), National information infrastructure initiatives: Vision and policy design (pp. 24–60). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  57. Yoon, J. (2007). Korea’s e-Government Strategy, a presentation from the National Information Society Agency, Korea.Google Scholar
  58. Zwahr, T., & Finger, M. (2004, June). Critical steps towards e-Governance: a case study analysis, A Proceeding of the 4th European Conference on E-Government 2004. Dublin, Ireland.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Computer Management & ScienceMirpurBangladesh

Personalised recommendations