Skip to main content

Sacred Bodies: Considering Resistance to Oncofertility in Muslim Communities

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Oncofertility

Part of the book series: Cancer Treatment and Research ((CTAR,volume 156))

Abstract

It has been correctly stated that the religion of Islam is defined by orthopraxy rather than by orthodoxy. That is, it is more a religion of practice and law than a religion of doctrine. In the absence of a central church, Muslims rely on legal scholars to define the acceptable parameters of Islamic practice. These scholars may come to disparate conclusions and define different modes of practice for discrete communities and still be considered genuinely “Islamic.” Thus, the practice of Islam in various locales often differs based on the leanings and predilections of the legal scholars in that area. The situation is further complicated by the fact that Muslims are not bound to follow any particular scholar or groups of scholars, but rather may choose to follow, or not follow, whomsoever they wish.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Eich T. Decision making practices among contemporary ‘Ulama: Islamic embryology and the discussion of Frozen embryos. In: Brokopp J, Eich T, Eds. Muslim medical ethics: from theory to practice. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press; 2008:73.

  2. 2.

    Sachedina AA. Islamic biomedical ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2009:111–113.

  3. 3.

    Ibid., 214

  4. 4.

    Ibid., 201

  5. 5.

    Ibid., 195

  6. 6.

    Qur’ān, 2:30

  7. 7.

    Q. 3:33, Q. 64:3, Q. 95:4

  8. 8.

    Q. 91:8

  9. 9.

    Q. 32:9

  10. 10.

    Q. 2:31

  11. 11.

    Several versions of this story can be found in the Qur’ān, including Q. 2:30–37; Q. 7: 11–25; Q. 20:115–125

  12. 12.

    Q. 7:42–43

  13. 13.

    Q. 75:3–4

  14. 14.

    Q. 36:65

  15. 15.

    Q 7:21

  16. 16.

    See Ebrahim A. Organ transplantation: contemporary Sunni Muslim legal and ethical perspectives. Bioethics. 1995; 9:291–302.

  17. 17.

    The discussion surrounding organ transplantation in legal debates is also helpful for elucidating the social factors influencing juridical decisions. See Hamdy S. Rethinking Islamic legal ethics in Egypt’s organ transplant debate. In: Brokopp J, Eich T, Eds. Muslim medical ethics: from theory to practice. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press; 2008:73.

  18. 18.

    Shaheen FAM, Souqiyyeh MZ. Increasing organ donation rates from muslim donors: lessons from a successful model. Transplant Proc. 2004; 36(7):1878–79.

  19. 19.

    Raza M, Hedayat KM. Some sociocultural aspects of cadaver organ donation: some recent rulings from Iran. Transplant Proc. 2004; 36(10):2888. Christian N. Challenging Islamic myth on organ transplants as ailments rise. New York Times. May 20, 2000:A9.

  20. 20.

    Keçecioğlu N, Tuncer M, Yücetin L, Akaydin M, Yakupoğlu G. Attitudes of religious people in turkey regarding organ donation and transplantation. Transplant Proc. 2000; 32(3):630; Rachmani R, Mizrahi S, Agabaria R. Transplant Proc. 2000 32(4):757.

  21. 21.

    Moazem F. Bioethics and organ transplantation in a Muslim society. Bloomington: Indiana University Press; 2006:166.

  22. 22.

    Al-Khawari F, Stimson G, Warrens AN. Attitudes toward transplantation in UK. Muslim Indo-Asians in West London. Am J Transplant. 2005; 5(6):1326–31.

  23. 23.

    Shaheen FA, Al-Jondeby M, Al-Khader AA. Important social factors that affect organ transplantation in Islamic countries. Exp Clin Transplant. 2003; 1(2):96–101.

  24. 24.

    Altraif IH, Al-Sebayel MI, Nondo H. Knowledge and attitude toward organ donation among males in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Saudi J Kidney Dis Transplant. 1996; 7(2):135–8.

  25. 25.

    Moazem F. Bioethics and organ transplantation in a Muslim society. Bloomington: Indiana University Press; 2006:164.

  26. 26.

    Some of these potential issues are raised in Shaheen FA, Al-Jondeby M, Kurpad R, Al-Khader AA. Social and cultural issues in organ transplantation in Islamic countries. Ann Transplant. 2004; 9(2):11–13.

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the oncofertility consortium NIH 8UL1DE019587, 5RL1HD058296.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rumee Ahmed .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ahmed, R. (2010). Sacred Bodies: Considering Resistance to Oncofertility in Muslim Communities. In: Woodruff, T., Zoloth, L., Campo-Engelstein, L., Rodriguez, S. (eds) Oncofertility. Cancer Treatment and Research, vol 156. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6518-9_21

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6518-9_21

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-6517-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-6518-9

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics