Advanced Supply Chain Models

  • Marc Goetschalckx
Part of the International Series in Operations Research & Management Science book series (ISOR, volume 161)


In Chap. 12, three, main models were developed for the planning and design of supply chains. The first model supported the selection of the transportation process for a single origin–destination link in the supply chain. Because of its focused scope the model could be highly detailed. The second model supported tactical planning. It accommodated multiple products with a bill of materials structure, multiple echelons, and multiple periods. The third major model supported strategic supply chain decisions. It accommodated multiple echelons and multiple periods, but not bill of material relationships. In general, the models became more aggregate when their scope and time horizon expanded. In this chapter, more advanced models are introduced that accommodate specific complicating features of the supply chain. The model used in the decision support for a specific supply chain instance may include some, but most likely not all, of these expansions. Increasing the complexity of the model requires more detailed data, more sophisticated algorithms, and longer computation times.


Supply Chain Transfer Price Bender Decomposition Supply Chain Design Transportation Channel 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Benders, P. (1962). Partitioning procedures for solving mixed-variables programming problems. Numerische Mathematik, 4, 238–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Canel, C. & Khumawala, B. M. (1997). Multi-period international facilities location: An algorithm and application. International Journal of Production Research, 35(7), 1891–1910.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cohen, M. A. & Lee, H. L. (1985). Manufacturing strategy: concepts and methods, Ch. 5 In P. R. Kleindorfer (Ed.), The management of productivity and technology in manufacturing, (pp. 153–188) New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  4. Cohen, M. A. & Lee, H. L. (1988). Strategic analysis of integrated production–distribution systems: models and methods. Operations Research, 36(2), 216–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cohen, M. A. & Lee, H. L. (1989). Resource deployment analysis of global manufacturing and distribution networks. Journal of Manufacturing Operations Management, 2, 81–104.Google Scholar
  6. Cohen, M. A. & Moon, S. (1991). An integrated plant loading model with economies of scale and scope European Journal of Operational Research, 50(3), 266–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cohen, M. A. & Kleindorfer, P. R. (1993). Creating value through operations: The legacy of Elwood S. Buffa. In R. K. Sarin, (Ed.), Perspectives in operations management (Essays in Honor of Elwood S. Buffa) (pp. 3–21). Boston: Kluwer Academic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cohen, M. A., Fisher, M., & Jaikumar, R. (1989). International manufacturing and distribution networks: a normative model framework. In K. Ferdows (Ed.), Managing international manufacturing (pp. 67–93). North-Holland: Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  9. Cohen, M. A. & Huchzermeier, A. (1999). Global supply chain management: A survey of research and applications. In S. Tayur et al. (Eds.), Quantitative models for supply chain management (pp. 669–702). Boston: Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar
  10. Dogan, K., & Goetschalckx, M. (1999). A primal decomposition method for the integrated design of multi-period production-distribution systems. IIE Transactions, 31(11) 1027–1036.Google Scholar
  11. Drezner, Z. (1995). Facility location: a survey of applications and methods. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  12. Erlenkotter D. (1978). A dual-based procedure for uncapacitated facility location. Operations Research, 26(6), 992–1009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Feldman, E., Lehrer, F. A., & Ray, T. L. (1966). Warehouse location under continuous economies of scale. Management Science, 12, 670–684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fisher, M. L. (1985). An applications oriented guide to lagrangian relaxation. Interfaces, 15(2), 10–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Francis, R. L., McGinnis, L. F., & White, J. A. (1992). Facility layout and location: An analytical approach. (2nd ed.) Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  16. Geoffrion, A. M., & Graves, G. W. (1974). Multicommodity distribution system design by Benders decomposition. Management Science, 20(5), 822–844.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Geoffrion, A. M., Graves, G. W., (1978) Strategic distribution system planning: A status report, In A. C. Hax (Ed.), Studies in Operations Management, Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  18. Geoffrion A. M., & McBride (1978). Lagreangean relaxation applied to capacitated facility location problems. Operations Research, 10(1), 40–47.Google Scholar
  19. Geoffrion, A. M., & Powers, R. F. (1980). Facility location analysis is just the beginning (if you do it right). Interfaces, 10(2), 22–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Geoffrion, A. M., Graves, G. W. & Lee, S. J. (1982). A management support system for distribution planning. INFOR, 20(4), 287–314.Google Scholar
  21. Geoffrion, A. M., Morris, J. G., & Webster, S. T. (1995). Distribution system design. In Z. Drezner (Ed.), Facility location: a survey of applications and methods. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  22. Geoffrion, A. M., & Powers, R. F. (1995). 20 years of strategic distribution system design: An evolutionary perspective. Interfaces, 25(5), 105–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Goetschalckx, M., Nemhauser, G., Cole, M. H., Wei, R., Dogan, K. & Zang, X. (1994). Computer-aided design of industrial logistic systems. In Proceedings of the Third Triennial Symposium on Transportation Analysis (TRISTAN III), Capri, Italy, pp. 151–178.Google Scholar
  24. Goetschalckx, M. (2000). Strategic network planning. In H. Stadtler & C. Kilger (Eds.), Supply chain management and advanced planning, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  25. Kuehn, A. A., & Hamburger, M. J. (1963), A heuristic program for locating warehouses. Management Science, 9 643–666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lasdon, L. S., (1970). Optimization Theory for Large Systems. New York: MacMillan.Google Scholar
  27. Lee, C. (1991). An optimal algorithm for the multiproduct capacitated facility location problem with a choice of facility type. Computers and Operational Research, 18(2), 167–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lee, C. (1993), A cross decomposition algorithm for a multiproduct-multitype facility location problem. Computers and Operational Research, 20(5), 527–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Love, R. F., Morris, J. G., & Wesolowsky, G. O. (1988). Facilities location. New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  30. Mirchandani, P. B., & Francis, R. L. (1990). Discrete location theory. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  31. Moon, S. (1989). Application of generalized Benders decomposition to a nonlinear distribution system design problem. Naval Research Logistics, 36, 283–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Nemhauser, G. L., & Wolsey, L. A. (1988). Integer and combinatorial optimization. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  33. Park, & Sharp, G. P. (1990). Engineering Economics.Google Scholar
  34. Schrage, L. (1986). Linear, Integer, and Quadratic Programming with LINDO. The Scientific Press.Google Scholar
  35. Schmidt, G., & Wilhelm, W. E. (2000). Strategic, tactical, and operational decisions in multi-national logistics networks: a review and discussion of modeling issues. International Journal of Production Research, 38(7), 1501–1523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Stadtler, H., & Kilger, C. (2000). Supply chain management and advanced planning. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  37. Tayur, S., Ganeshan, R., & Magazine, M. (Eds.). (1999). Quantitative models for supply chain management. Boston: Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar
  38. Thomas, D. & Griffin, P. M. (1996). Coordinated supply chain management. European Journal of Operational Research, 94, 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Van Roy, T. J., & Erlenkotter, D. (1982). A dual-based procedure for dynamic facility location. Management Science, 28, 1091–1105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Van Roy, T. (1983). Cross decomposition for mixed integer programming. Mathematical Programming, 25, 46–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Van Roy, T. (1986). A cross Decomposition algorithm for capacitated facility location. Operations Research, 34(1), 145–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Verter, V., & Dasci, A. (2001). The plant location and flexible technology acquisition problem. European Journal of Operational Research (to appear).Google Scholar
  43. Vidal, C., & Goetschalckx, M. (1996). The role and limitations of quantitative techniques in the strategic design of global logistics systems, CIBER Research Report 96-023, Georgia Institute of Technology. Accepted for publication in the special issue on Manufacturing in a Global Economy of the Journal of Technology Forecasting and Social Change.Google Scholar
  44. Vidal, C., & Goetschalckx, M. (1997). Strategic production-distribution models: A critical review with emphasis on global supply chain models. European Journal of Operational Research, 98, 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Vidal, C., & Goetschalckx, M. (2000). Modeling the impact of uncertainties on global logistics systems. Journal of Business Logistics, 21(1), 95–120.Google Scholar
  46. Vidal, C. & Goetschalckx, M. (2001). A global supply chain model with transfer pricing and transportation cost allocation. European Journal of Operational Research, 129(1), 134–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.H. Milton Stewart School of Industrial & Systems EngineeringGeorgia Institute of TechnologyAtlantaUSA

Personalised recommendations