Active Matter

  • Gautam I. Menon


The term active matter describes diverse systems, spanning macroscopic (e.g., shoals of fish and flocks of birds) to microscopic scales (e.g., migrating cells, motile bacteria and gels formed through the interaction of nanoscale molecular motors with cytoskeletal filaments within cells). Such systems are often idealizable in terms of collections of individual units, referred to as active particles or self-propelled particles, which take energy from an internal replenishable energy depot or ambient medium and transduce it into useful work performed on the environment, in addition to dissipating a fraction of this energy into heat. These individual units may interact both directly and through disturbances propagated via the medium in which they are immersed. Active particles can exhibit remarkable collective behavior as a consequence of these interactions, including non-equilibrium phase transitions between novel dynamical phases, large fluctuations violating expectations from the central limit theorem and substantial robustness against the disordering effects of thermal fluctuations. In this chapter, following a brief summary of experimental systems, which may be classified as examples of active matter, I describe some of the principles which underlie the modelling of such systems.


Stress Tensor Active Matter Polar Order Hydrodynamic Description Nematic Order 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



I thank Sriram Ramaswamy and Madan Rao for many enlightening and valuable discussions concerning the physics of active matter. Conversations at various points of time with Cristina Marchetti, Tanniemola Liverpool, Jacques Prost, Karsten Kruse, Frank Julicher, David Lacoste, Ronojoy Adhikari, P. B. Sunil Kumar, Aparna Baskaran and Jean-Francois Joanny have also helped to shape the material in this chapter. This work was supported by DST (India) and by the Indo-French Centre for the Promotion of Advanced Research (CEFIPRA) [Grant No. 3502]. The hospitality of ESPCI and the Institut Henri Poncare is gratefully acknowledged.


  1. 1.
    Ahmadi GA, Marchetti MC, Liverpool TB (2006) Hydrodynamics of isotropic and liquid crystalline active polymer solutions. Phys Rev E 74:061913CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ballerini M, Cabibbo N, Candelier R et al (2008) Interaction ruling animal collective behavior depends on topological rather than metric distance: Evidence from a field study. Proc Nat Acad Sci 105:1232–1237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Baskaran A, Marchetti MC (2008) Hydrodynamics of self-propelled hard rods. Phys Rev E 77:011920MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Baskaran A, Marchetti MC (2009) Statistical mechanics and hydrodynamics of bacterial suspensions. Proc Nat Acad Sci 106:15567–15572CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bazazi S, Buhl J, Hale et al (2008) Collective motion and cannibalism in locust migratory bands. Curr Biol 18(10):735–739CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bershadsky A, Kozlov M, Geiger B (2006) Adhesion-mediated mechanosensitivity: A time to experiment, and a time to theorize. Curr Opin Cell Biol 18:472–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bray D (1992) Cell movements: From molecules to motility. Garland Publishing, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Buhl J, Sumpter DJT, Couzin ID et al (2006) From disorder to order in marching locusts. Science 312(5778):1402–1406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    de Gennes PG, Prost J (1993) Physics of liquid crystals, 2nd edn. Clarendon, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dombrowski C, Cisneros L, Chatkaew L et al (2004) Self-concentration and large-scale coherence in bacterial dynamics. Phys Rev Lett 93:098103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Giomi L, Marchetti MC, Liverpool TB (2008) Complex spontaneous flows and concentration banding in active polar films. Phys Rev Lett 101:198101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gruler H, Dewald U, Eberhardt M (1999) Nematic liquid crystals formed by living amoeboid cells. Eur Phys J B 11:187–192Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hatwalne Y, Ramaswamy S, Rao M et al (2004) Rheology of active-particle suspensions. Phys Rev Lett 92:118101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Jűlicher F, Kruse K, Prost J et al (2007) Active behavior of the cytoskeleton. Phys Rep449:3–28Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Karsenti E, Nedelec FJ, Surrey T (2006) Modeling microtubule patterns. Nature Cell Biol 8:1204–1211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kruse K, Joanny JF, Jűlicher F et al (2004) Asters, vortices, and rotating spirals in active gels of polar filaments. Phys Rev Lett 92:078101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kruse K, Joanny JF, Jűlicher F et al (2005) Generic theory of active polar gels: A paradigm for cytoskeletal dynamics. Eur Phys J E 16:5 –16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lacoste D, Menon GI, Bazant MZ et al (2009) Electrostatic and electrokinetic contributions to the elastic moduli of a driven membrane. Eur Phys J E 28:243–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lau AWC, Lubensky T (2009) Fluctuating hydrodynamics and microrheology of a dilute suspension of swimming bacteria. Phys Rev E 80:011917CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Liverpool TB, Marchetti MC (2006) Rheology of active filament solutions. Phys Rev Lett 97:268101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Makris NC, Ratilal P, Symonds DT et al (2000) Fish population and behavior revealed by instantaneous continental shelf-scale imaging. Science 311:660–663CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Marcy Y, Prost J, Carlier MF et al (2004) Forces generated during actin-based propulsion: A direct measurement by micromanipulation. Proc Nat Acad Sci 101:5992–5997CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Marenduzzo D, Orlandini E, Cates ME et al (2008), Lattice Boltzmann simulations of spontaneous flow in active liquid crystals: The role of boundary conditions. J Non-Newt Fluid Mech 149:56–62zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Muhuri S, Rao M, Ramaswamy S (2007) Shear-flow-induced isotropic to nematic transition in a suspension of active filaments. Europhys Lett 78:48002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Narayanan V, Ramaswamy S, Menon N (2007) Long-lived giant number fluctuations in a swarming granular nematic. Science 317:105–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Nedelec FJ, Surrey T, Maggs AC et al (1997) Self-organization of microtubules and motors. Nature 389:305–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Purcell EM (1977) Life at low Reynolds number. Am J Phys 45:3–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Rafelski SM, Theriot JA (2004) Crawling toward a unified model of cell motility: Spatial and temporal regulation of actin dynamics. Annu Rev Biochem 73:209–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ramachandran S, Sunil Kumar PB, Pagonabarraga I (2006) A Lattice-Boltzmann model for suspensions of self-propelling colloidal particles. Eur Phys J E 20:151–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Ramaswamy S, Rao M (2007) Active filament hydrodynamics: Instabilities, boundary conditions and rheology. New J Phys 9:423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Ramaswamy S, Simha RA, Toner J (2003) Active nematics on a substrate: Giant number fluctuations and long-time tails. Eur Phys Lett 62:196–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Saintillan D, Shelley MJ (2008) Instabilities and pattern formation in active particle suspensions: Kinetic theory and continuum simulations. Phys Rev Lett 100:178103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Simha RA, Ramaswamy S (2002) Hydrodynamic fluctuations and instabilities in ordered suspensions of self-propelled particles. Phys Rev Lett 89:058101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Simha RA, Ramaswamy S (2002) Statistical hydrodynamics of ordered suspensions of self-propelled particles: Waves, giant number fluctuations and instabilities. Physica A 306:262–269zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Stark H, Lubensky TC (2003) Poisson-bracket approach to the dynamics of nematic liquid crystals. Phys Rev E 76:061709MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Toner J, Tu Y (1998) Flocks, herds, and schools: A quantitative theory of flocking. Phys Rev E 58:4828–4858MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Toner J, Tu Y (1998) Long-range order in a two-dimensional dynamical XY model: How birds fly together. Phys Rev Lett 75:4326–4329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Toner J, Tu Y, Ramaswamy S (2005) Hydrodynamics and phases of flocks. Ann Phys 318: 170–244MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Turner L, Ryu WS, Berg HC (2000) Real-time imaging of fluorescent flagellar filaments. J Bacteriol 182:2793–2801CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Verkhovsky AB, Svitkina TM, Borisy GG (1999) Self-polarization and directional motility of cytoplasm. Curr Biol 9(1):11–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Vicsek T, Czirk A, Ben-Jacob E et al (1995) Novel type of phase transition in a system of self-driven particles. Phys Rev Lett 75:1226–1229CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The Institute of Mathematical SciencesChennaiIndia

Personalised recommendations