Skip to main content

Occupancy and Motion Detectors

  • 8082 Accesses

Abstract

September 11 has changed the way people think about airport, aviation, and security in general. The threat is expanding interest in more reliable systems to detect presence of people within the protected perimeters. The occupancy sensors detect the presence of people (and sometimes animals) in a monitored area. Motion detectors respond only to moving objects. A distinction between the two is that the occupancy sensors produce signals whenever an object is stationary or not, while the motion detectors are selectively sensitive to moving objects. The applications of these sensors include security, surveillance, energy management (electric lights control ), personal safety, friendly home appliances, point-of-sale advertisements, interactive toys, novelty products, etc.

Keywords

  • Light Emit Diode
  • Motion Detector
  • Doppler Frequency
  • Fresnel Lens
  • Pyroelectric Sensor

These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4419-6466-3_6
  • Chapter length: 32 pages
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
eBook
USD   119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • ISBN: 978-1-4419-6466-3
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
Softcover Book
USD   159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Fig. 6.1
Fig. 6.2
Fig. 6.3
Fig. 6.4
Fig. 6.5
Fig. 6.6
Fig. 6.7
Fig. 6.8
Fig. 6.9
Fig. 6.10
Fig. 6.11
Fig. 6.12
Fig. 6.13
Fig. 6.14
Fig. 6.15
Fig. 6.16
Fig. 6.17
Fig. 6.18
Fig. 6.19
Fig. 6.20
Fig. 6.21
Fig. 6.22
Fig. 6.23

Notes

  1. 1.

    Perhaps just steering up some suspicion about living in a haunted house.

  2. 2.

    A very nice movie “How to Steal a Million” (1966) was based on a plot where multiple false-positive alarms were so irritating that officials disabled the electronic protection system, exactly what the perpetrator was looking for.

  3. 3.

    During Doppler times, the acoustical instruments for precision measurements were not available yet. To prove his theory, Doppler placed trumpeters on a railroad flatcar and musicians with a sense of absolute pitch near the tracks. A locomotive engine pulled the flatcar back and forth at different speeds for two days. The musicians on the ground “recorded” the trumpet notes as the train approached and receded. The equations held up.

  4. 4.

    At 40 MHz, the dielectric constant of muscle, skin, and blood is about 97. For fat and bone, it is near 15.

  5. 5.

    Here, by “earth” we mean any large object, such as the earth, lake, metal fence, car, ship, airplane, and so forth.

  6. 6.

    This device was developed for NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory by M.S. Katow at Planning Research Corp.

  7. 7.

    Many “man-made” objects are made by women, so do not look for any sexism here.

  8. 8.

    In a differential sensor, as described below, two “pixels” are employed.

  9. 9.

    “Motion Switch” of Fig. 6.14a for some time was manufactured by Intermatic, Inc.

References

  1. Blumenkrantz S (1989) Personal and organizational security handbook. Government Data Publications, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ryser P, Pfister G (1991) Optical fire and security technology: sensor principles and detection intelligence. In: Transducers’91. International conference on solid-state sensors and actuators. Digest of technical papers, pp 579–583, ©IEEE

    Google Scholar 

  3. Fraden J (1991) Apparatus and method for detecting movement of an object. US Patent 5,019,804, 28 May

    Google Scholar 

  4. Fraden J (1984) Motion discontinuance detection system and method. US Patent 4,450,351, 22 May

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fitz Gerald AS (1932) Photo-electric system. US Patent 2,016,032, 4 Feb 1932

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fraden J (1984) Toy including motion-detecting means for activating same. US Patent 4,479,329, 30 Oct

    Google Scholar 

  7. Fraden J (1990) Active infrared motion detector and method for detecting movement. US Patent 4,896,039, 23 Jan

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fraden J (1992) Active far infrared detectors. In: Temperature. Its measurement and control in science and industry, vol 6, part 2. AIP, New York, pp 831–836

    Google Scholar 

  9. Parsons NE et al (1999) Object-sensor-based flow-control system employing fiber-optic signal transmission. US Patent 5,984,262, 16 Nov

    Google Scholar 

  10. Parsons NE et al (2003) Automatic flow controller employing energy-conservation mode. US Patent 6,619,614, 16 Sept

    Google Scholar 

  11. Parsons NE et al (2008) Passive sensors for automatic faucets and bathroom flushers. US Patent 7,396,000, 8 July

    Google Scholar 

  12. Fraden J (2007) Alarm system with air pressure detector. US Patent Publication US 2008/0055079, 31 Aug

    Google Scholar 

  13. Fraden J (2009) Detector of low levels of gas pressure and flow. US Patent 7,490,512, 17 Feb

    Google Scholar 

  14. Fraden J (1988) Motion detector. US Patent 4,769,545, 6 Sept

    Google Scholar 

  15. Long DJ (1975) Occupancy detector apparatus for automotive safety system. US Patent 3,898,472, 5 Aug

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jacob Fraden .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Fraden, J. (2010). Occupancy and Motion Detectors. In: Handbook of Modern Sensors. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6466-3_6

Download citation