Skip to main content

Quantum Theory of Interaction of Radiation Field with Matter

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Lasers

Part of the book series: Graduate Texts in Physics ((GTP))

  • 5984 Accesses

Abstract

In this chapter we show that the electromagnetic field can be considered as an infinite set of harmonic oscillators, each corresponding to a particular value of the frequency, wave vector, and a particular state of polarization. Comparing with the quantum mechanical treatment of harmonic oscillators, we replace the generalized coordinates and generalized momenta by operators. By imposing the commutation relations between the canonical variables, it is shown that the energy of each oscillator can increase or decrease by integral multiples of a certain quantum of energy; this quantum of energy is known as the photon. Having quantized the field, we show that the state which corresponds to a given number of photons (also referred to as the number state) for a particular mode does not correspond to the classical plane wave. Indeed, we show that the eigenstates of the annihilation operator (which are known as the coherent states) resemble the classical plane wave for large intensities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This is because \(\nabla \times \left( {\nabla \chi } \right) = 0\) for arbitrary χ.

  2. 2.

    Notice that

    $$\frac{{\partial {\textbf{H}}_\lambda }}{{\partial Q_\lambda }} = \omega _\lambda ^2 Q_\lambda = \omega _\lambda ^2 \left( {\varepsilon _0 V} \right)^{1/2} \left( {q_\lambda + q_\lambda ^{\ast}} \right) = i\left( {\varepsilon _0 V\omega _\lambda ^2 } \right)^{1/2} \left( {\dot q_\lambda - \dot q_\lambda ^{\ast}} \right) = - \dot P_\lambda $$

    Similarly

    $$\frac{{\partial {\textbf{H}}_\lambda }}{{\partial P_\lambda }} = \dot Q_\lambda $$

    which are nothing but Hamilton’s equations of motion (see, e.g., Goldstein (1950)). Thus \(Q_\lambda \) and \(P_\lambda \) are the canonical coordinates.

  3. 3.

    We say it loosely because it is not possible to define a phase operator which is real (see Section 9.7).

  4. 4.

    In the Heisenberg representation, the expectation value of \(\hat a\) would have been \(\left\langle {\Psi \left( 0 \right)} \right|\hat a\left( t \right)\left| {\Psi \left( 0 \right)} \right\rangle = \left\langle \alpha \right|\hat a{e}^{{i}\omega t} \left| \alpha \right\rangle = a^{\ast}{e}^{{i}\omega t} \), which is the same as expressed by Eq. (9.111).

  5. 5.

    It is of interest to point out that even in nuclear counting, the uncertainty in the actual count is \(N^{1/2} \) (see, e.g., Bleuler and Goldsmith (1952)).

  6. 6.

    The appearance of the term \(\left( {n + 1} \right)\) is because of the relation

    $$\hat a^{\dag} \left| n \right\rangle = \left( {n + 1} \right)^{1/2} \left| {n + 1} \right\rangle $$
  7. 7.

    This can be shown by noting that repeated application of Eq. (9.200) gives

    $$N_{{\textrm{op}}} \phi ^m - \phi ^m N_{{\textrm{op}}} = - {i}m\phi ^{m - 1} $$

    Now

    $$\left[ {N_{{\textrm{op}}} ,{e}^{{i}\phi } } \right] = \sum\limits_m {\frac{{{i}^m }}{{m!}}} \left[ {N_{{\textrm{op}}} ,e^m } \right] = \sum {\frac{{{i}^{m - 1} \phi ^{m - 1} }}{{\left( {m - 1} \right)!}}} = {e}^{{i}\phi } $$
  8. 8.

    Equation (9.2008.152) may be compared with the equation [see Eq. (7.37)]

    $$\left[ {x,p_x } \right] = xp_x - p_x x = {i}\hbar $$

    from which one can derive the uncertainty relation

    $$\Delta x\,\Delta p_x \ge \hbar $$

    (see any text on quantum mechanics, e.g., Powell and Craseman (1961)).

References

  • Bleuler, E., and Goldsmith, G. J. (1952), Experimental Nucleonics, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dirac, P. A. M. (1958b), Quantum Theory of Emission and Absorption in Quantum Electrodynamics (J. Schwinger, ed.), Dover Publications, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, H. (1950), Classical Mechanics, Addison-Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heitler, W. (1954), Quantum Theory of Radiation, Oxford University Press, London.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hong, C. K., Ou, Z. Y., and Mandel, L. (1987), Measurement of subpicosecond time intervals between two photons by interference, Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 2044.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Loudon, R. (1973), The Quantum theory of Light, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, J. L., and Craseman, B. (1961), Quantum Mechanics, Addison-Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Susskind, L., and Glogower, J. (1964), Quantum mechanical phase and time operator, Physics 1, 49.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. Thyagarajan .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Thyagarajan, K., Ghatak, A. (2011). Quantum Theory of Interaction of Radiation Field with Matter. In: Lasers. Graduate Texts in Physics. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6442-7_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics