Territorial Fragility and the Future of Tibet: Sub-sovereignty, Problems and Theoretical Solutions



This chapter addresses a wide range of theoretical discussions of a “two-tier system” in the post-Westphalian concept of international relations. Various potential applications of the system in the contemporary world order, especially in Europe and Asia, will be discussed. At last, this chapter looks at whether the model might satisfy the criteria for compromise and be applicable to separatist movements in China like that in Tibet, by summarizing a list of de facto criteria for compromise for any acceptable solution to all sides concerned, with a conclusion on the potential for China to apply the model to enhance its international standing given at the end.


Sovereign State Soft Power Tibetan Autonomous Region Full Independence Separatist Movement 


  1. Ardley J (2003) Satyagraha in Tibet: toward a Ghandian solution? Tibet Journal 28(4): 22–28.Google Scholar
  2. Berkin M (2000) The great Tibetan stonewall of China. B. Rose Law, Chichester, West Sussex.Google Scholar
  3. Bobbitt P (2002) The shield of Achilles: War, peace, and the course of history. Anchor Books, New York, NY.Google Scholar
  4. Brown C (2002) Sovereignty, rights and justice: International political theory today. Polity, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  5. Chan K (2005) Religion in China in the twenty-first century: Some scenarios. Religion, State and Society 33(2) (June): 87–119.Google Scholar
  6. Crawford J (2005) The creation of states in international law. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  7. Cross MKD (2007) The European diplomatic corps: Diplomats and international cooperation from Westphalia to Maastricht. Palgrave Macmillan, New York, NY.Google Scholar
  8. Davis M (2007) The quest for self-rule in Tibet. Journal of Democracy 18(4): 157–171.Google Scholar
  9. Dreyer J (2000) China’s political system. Longman, New York, NY.Google Scholar
  10. Gagliardo J (1991) Germany under the old regime. Longman London.Google Scholar
  11. Gerhardt V (1998) On the historical significance of the Peace of Westphalia: Twelve theses, 485. In: Klaus B, and Heinz S (Eds.) 1648 -War and Peace in Europe, vol. 1.Google Scholar
  12. Hari J (2004) Dalai Lama Interview. The Independent, 7 June.Google Scholar
  13. He LL (2007) Xizang Jiefang Jincheng zhongde Tongyi Zhanxian Lilun yu Shijian (The Theory and Practice of the United Front in the Liberation Process of Tibet”). Journal of Chongqing Institute of Socialism 4: 71–74.Google Scholar
  14. He BG,and Sautman B (2005–2006) The politics of the Dalai Lama’s new initiative for autonomy. Pacific Affairs 78(4): 601–629.Google Scholar
  15. Kordan BS (2001) Canada and the Ukrainian question, 1939–1945. McGill-Queen’s University Press, McGill.Google Scholar
  16. Kristof ND (2008) An olive branch from the Dalai Lama. New York Times. 6 August.Google Scholar
  17. Dalai Lama (1987) Five point peace plan for Tibet, Speech addressed to Members of United States Congress, 21 September 1987.Google Scholar
  18. Dalai Lama (1994) Statement of his holiness the Dalai Lama on the thirty-fifth anniversary of the Tibetan national uprising day [http://dalailama.com/messages/tibet/10th-march-archive/1994. Accessed on 17 August 2009].
  19. Dalai Lama (1996) Misconceptions on the Tibetan issue, 47–51. in: Shiromany AA (ed.) The Spirit of Tibet, Vision for Human Liberation: Selected Speeches and Writing of HH the XIV Dalai Lama. Tibetan Parliamentary and Policy Research Centre, New Delhi.Google Scholar
  20. Dalai Lama (2008) His Holiness’s middle way approach for resolving the issue of Tibet, the Dalai Lama Website [http://www.dalailama.com/page.225.htm. Accessed on 20 October 2008].
  21. Dalai Lama (2008) Meaning of the middle-way approach [http://www.dalailama.com/page.225.html, accessed on 15 October].
  22. Lane KP (1990) Sovereignty and the status quo: The historical roots of China’s Hong Kong Policy. Westview Oxford.Google Scholar
  23. Li Y (2003) Ping Dalai Lama de Zhongjian Daolu (Comment on the Dalai Lama’s Middle Road). China’s Tibet 3: 20–22.Google Scholar
  24. Liao TQ (2007) Cong Guoji Shiye kan Cangzhong Tanpan (Seeing the Sino-Tibetan Negotiation from an International Perspective. Xizang Tongxun (Tibet Communication) 62 (May-June): 12–14.Google Scholar
  25. Luard E (1992) The balance of power: The system of international relations, 1648–1815. Macmillan, London.Google Scholar
  26. Ma HX (2008) To maintain social stability for the sake of Tibetan people’s fundamental interests. Journal of Tibet Nationalities Institute (Philosophy and Social Science Edition) 29(4): 1–18.Google Scholar
  27. Margolin AD (1946) From a political diary: Russia, the Ukraine, and America, 1905–1945. Columbia University Press, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  28. New York Times, 19 June 1945, 8.Google Scholar
  29. Pellet A (1992) The opinions of from the Badinter Arbitration committee a second breath for the self-determination of peoples. European Journal of International Law 3: 181.Google Scholar
  30. Philpott D (2001) Revolutions in sovereignty: How ideas shaped modern international relations. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
  31. Postiglione GA, and Tang JTH (Eds.) (1997) Hong Kong’s reunion with China. Hong Kong University Press, Hong Kong.Google Scholar
  32. Potter PB (2003) Belief in control: Regulation of religion in China. The China Quarterly 174 (June): 317–337.Google Scholar
  33. Randle R (1973) The origin of peace: A study of peacemaking and the structure of peace settlements. Free, New York, NY.Google Scholar
  34. Richardson JT, and Edleman B (2003) Falun Gong and the law: Development and legal social control in China. Nova Religio 6 (Issue 2 April): 277–293.Google Scholar
  35. Sautman B (2002) Resolving the Tibet question: Problems and prospects. Journal of Contemporary China 11: 77–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sautman B (2005) China’s strategic vulnerability to minority separatism in Tibet. Asian Affairs: An American Review 32(2 (Summer)): 87–118.Google Scholar
  37. Schlesinger SC (2004) Act of creation: The founding of the united nations: A story of superpowers, secret agents, wartime allies and enemies and their quest for a peaceful world. Westview, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  38. Shen S (2009) Borrowing the Hong Kong identity for Chinese diplomacy: Implications of Margaret Chan’s World Health Organization election campaign. Pacific Affairs 81(3): 361–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Shih CY (2008) Xizang Wenhua Zizhi Wenhua Miejue Yu Qu Zuqunhua (Tibet cultural self-governing, cultural genocide and ethnocide), Mingpao, 14 May.Google Scholar
  40. Smith WW (2008) China’s Tibet? autonomy or assimilation. Rowman & Littlefield, Lanham, MD.Google Scholar
  41. South China Morning Post (2000) Plan for west aims to avoid ‘New Kosovo’. 17 February, 8.Google Scholar
  42. Tao CZ (2007) Zhongjian Daolu de Shizhi shi Tumou Xizang Duli (Xia) (The Real Agenda of the Middle Way is Tibet Independence). Xizang Tongyi Zhanxian (The United Front of Tibet Unification) 4: 16–19.Google Scholar
  43. Tibetan Youth Congress (2009a) Aims and objectives. http://www.tibetanyouthcongress.org/aboutus.html. Accessed on 28 January.
  44. Tibetan Youth Congress (2009b) White paper. http://www.tibetanyouthcongress.org/conclusion.htm. Accessed on 30 January 2009.
  45. Timasheff NS (1945) Legal aspects of the grant of three seats to Russia in the United Nations charter. Fordham Law Review 14: 180–181.Google Scholar
  46. Vishniak M (1949) Sovereignty in soviet law. Russian Review 8(1): 35–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Weber M (1994) The profession and vocation of politics. in: Lassman P, and Spears R (ed.) Weber: Political writings. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  48. Yakovenko N (2002) Ukraine in British strategies and concepts of foreign policy, 1917–1922 and After. East European Quarterly 36: 21–45.Google Scholar
  49. Yu AC (2005) State and religion in China: historical and textual perspectives. Open Court, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
  50. Zhang WM (1999) Kesuowo Zhanzheng yu Zhongguo xin Shiji Anquan Zhanlue (The Kosovo War and China’s Security in the New Century). Zhanlue Yu Guanli (Strategy and Management) 3: 1–10.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Hong Kong Institute of EducationHong KongChina

Personalised recommendations