Advertisement

Aggregation and Arbitrage in Joint Production

  • V. Eldon Ball
  • Ricardo Cavazos
  • Jeffrey LaFrance
  • Rulon Pope
  • Jesse Tack
Chapter
Part of the Studies in Productivity and Efficiency book series (SIPE, volume 7)

Abstract

Two common problems in econometric models of production are aggregation and unobservable variables. Many production processes are subject to production shocks, hence both expected and realized output is unknown when inputs are committed. Expectations processes are notoriously difficult to model, especially when working with aggregated data or risk-averse decision makers. Duality methods for the incomplete systems of consumer demand equations are adapted to the dual structure of variable cost function in joint production. This allows the identification of necessary and sufficient restrictions on technology and cost so that the conditional factor demands can be written as functions of input prices, fixed inputs, and cost. These are observable when the variable inputs are chosen and committed to production, hence the identified restrictions allow ex ante conditional demands to be studied using only observable data. This class of production technologies is consistent with all von Neumann-Morgenstern utility functions when ex post production is uncertain. We then derive the complete class of input demand systems that are exactly aggregable, can be specified and estimated with observable data, and are consistent with economic theory for all von Neumann/Morgenstern risk preferences. We extend this to a general and flexible class of input demand systems that can be used to nest and test for aggregation, global economic regularity, functional form, and flexibility. The theory is applied to U.S. agricultural production and crop acreage allocation decisions by state for the years 1960–1999. Ongoing work includes applying this model to a recently updated data set created by the USDA/ERS through 2004 and estimating the intensive and extensive margin effects for state-level crop production with a stochastic dynamic programming model of risk aversion, asset management, and adjustment costs.

Keywords

Input Price Adjustment Cost Joint Production Stochastic Dynamic Programming Input Demand 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Akridge, J.T., Hertel, T.W. (1986), Multiproduct cost relationships for retail fertilizer plants, American Journal of Agricultural Economics 68: 928–938.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ball, V.E. (1988), Modelling supply response in a multiproduct framework, American Journal of Agricultural Economics 70: 813–825.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ball, V.E., Hallahan, C., Nehring, R. (2004), Convergence of productivity: An analysis of the catch-up hypothesis within a panel of states, American Journal of Agricultural Economics 86: 1315–3121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Banks, J., Blundell, R., Lewbel, A. (1997), Quadratic Engel curves and consumer demand, The Review of Economics and Statistics 79: 527–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beatty, T.K.M., LaFrance, J.T. (2005), United States demand for food and nutrition in the twentieth century, American Journal of Agricultural Economics 93: 1159–1166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Blackorby, C., Primont, D., Russell, R. (1977), Dual price and quantity aggregation. Journal of Economic Theory 14: 130–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blackorby, C., Primont, D., Russell, R. (1978), Duality, Separability and Functional Structure: Theory and Economic Applications, American Elsevier/North-Holland, New York, NY.Google Scholar
  8. Blundell, R. (1988), Consumer behavior: Theory and empirical evidence – A survey, The Economic Journal 98: 16–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brown, B.W., Walker, M.B. (1989), The random utility hypothesis and inference in demand systems, Econometrica 57: 815–829.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Burt, O.R., Brewer, D. (1971), Estimation of net social benefits from outdoor recreation, Econometrica 39: 813–827.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chambers, R.G. (1984), A note on separability of the indirect production function and measures of substitution, Southern Economic Journal 4: 1189–1191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chambers, R.G., Pope, R.D. (1991), Testing for consistent aggregation, American Journal of Agricultural Economics 73: 808–818.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chambers, R.G., Pope, R.D. (1994), A virtually ideal production system: Specifying and estimating the VIPS model, American Journal of Agricultural Economics 76: 105–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chambers, R.G., Quiggin, J. (2000), Uncertainty, Production, Choice and Agency: The State-Contingent Approach, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  15. Chavas, J.-P. (2008), A cost approach to economic analysis under state-contingent production uncertainty, American Journal of Agricultural Economics 90: 435–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cicchetti, C., Fisher, A., Smith, V.K. (1976), An econometric evaluation of a generalized consumer surplus measure: The mineral king controversy, Econometrica 44: 1259–1276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Deaton, A., Muellbauer, J. (1980), An almost ideal demand system, American Economic Review, 70: 312–326.Google Scholar
  18. Diewert, W.E. (1971), “An Application of the Shephard Duality Theorem: A Generalized Leontief Production Function,” Journal of Political Economy, 79: 481–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Diewert, W.E., Wales, T.J. (1987), Flexible functional forms and global curvature conditions, Econometrica 55: 43–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Diewert, W.E., Wales, T.J. (1988), Normalized quadratic systems of consumer demand functions, Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 6: 303–312.Google Scholar
  21. Färe, R., Primont, D. (1995), Multi-Output Production and Duality: Theory and Applications, Kluwer-Nijhoff, Boston, MA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gorman, W.M. (1953), Community preference fields, Econometrica 21: 63–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gorman, W.M. (1961), On a class of preference fields, Metroeconomica 13: 53–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gorman, W.M. (1981), Some Engel curves, In A. Deaton (ed.), Essays in Honour of Sir Richard Stone, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, MA, 7–29.Google Scholar
  25. Hall, R.E. (1973), The specification of technology with several kinds of output, Journal of Political Economy 81: 878–892.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hoppe, R.A. and D.E. Banker, (2006), Structure and Finances of U.S. Farms: 2005 Family Farm Report, EIB-12. Washington DC: United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.Google Scholar
  27. Howe, H., Pollak, R.A., Wales, T.J. (1979), Theory and time series estimation of the quadratic expenditure system, Econometrica 47: 1231–1247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Jerison, M. (1993), Russell on Gorman's Engel curves: A correction, Economics Letters 23: 171–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Jorgenson, D.W. (1990), “Consumer Behavior and the Measurement of Social Welfare.” Econometrica 58 (1990): 1007–1040.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Jorgenson, D.W., Slesnick, D.T. (1984), Aggregate consumer behavior and the measurement of inequality, Review of Economic Studies 51: 369–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Jorgenson, D.W., Slesnick, D.T. (1987), Aggregate consumer behavior and household equivalence scales, Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 5: 219–232.Google Scholar
  32. Jorgenson, D.W., Lau, L.J., Stoker, T.M. (1980), Welfare comparisons under exact aggregation, American Economic Review 70: 268–272.Google Scholar
  33. Jorgenson, D.W., Lau, L.J., Stoker, T.M. (1981), “Aggregate Consumer Behavior and Individual Welfare,” In D. Currie, R. Nobray and D. Peel (eds.), Macroeconomic Analysis: Essays in Macroeconomics and Economics, London: Croom-Helm, 35–61.Google Scholar
  34. Jorgenson, D.W., Lau, L.J., Stoker, T.M. (1982), The transendental logarithmic model of aggregate consumer behavior,” In R.L. Basmann, G.F. Rhodes, Jr. (eds.), Advances in Econometrics, Volume I, Greenwich: JAI Press: 97–238.Google Scholar
  35. Just, R., Zilberman, D., Hochman, E. (1983), Estimation of multicrop production functions, American Journal of Agricultural Economics 65: 770–780.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kohli, U. (1983), Non-joint technologies, Review of Economic Studies 50: 209–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. LaFrance, J.T., Beatty, T.K.M., Pope, R.D. (2005), Building Gorman’s Nest, 9th World Congress of the Econometrics Society, London, U. K.Google Scholar
  38. LaFrance, J.T., Beatty, T.K.M., Pope, R.D. (2006), Gorman Engel curves for incomplete demand systems, In M.T. Holt, J.-P. Chavas (eds.), Exploring Frontiers in Applied Economics: Essays in Honor of Stanley R. Johnson, Electronic Press, Berkeley.Google Scholar
  39. LaFrance, J.T., Beatty, T.K.M., Pope, R.D., Agnew, G.K. (2000), The U.S. income distribution and Gorman Engel curves for food, Proceedings of the International Institute for Fishery Economics and Trade, Corvalis, Oregon.Google Scholar
  40. LaFrance, J.T., Beatty, T.K.M., Pope, R.D., Agnew, G.K. (2002), Information theoretic measures of the U.S. income distribution in food demand, Journal of Econometrics 107: 235–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. LaFrance, J.T., Pope, R.D. (2008a), Homogeneity and supply, American Journal of Agricultural Economics 90: 606–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. LaFrance, J.T., Pope, R.D. (2008b), Full Rank Rational Demand Systems. Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of California, Berkeley, Working Paper No 1021.Google Scholar
  43. LaFrance, J.T., Pope, R.D. (2009), The generalized quadratic expenditure system, In D. Slottje (ed.), Contributions to Economic Analysis: Quantifying Consumer Preferences, Elsevier, New York, NY, 84–116.Google Scholar
  44. LaFrance, J.T., Pope, R.D. (2010), Duality theory for variable costs in joint production, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 92: 755–762.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Lau, L. (1972), Profit functions of technologies with multiple input and output, Review of Economics and Statistics 54: 281–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Lau, L. (1978), Applications of profit functions, In M. Fuss, D. McFadden (eds.), Production Economics: A Dual Approach to Theory and Applications, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 134–216.Google Scholar
  47. Lau, L. (1982), A note on the fundamental theorem of exact aggregation, Economic Letters 9: 119–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Lewbel, A. (1987a), Characterizing some Gorman systems that satisfy consistent aggregation, Econometrica 55: 1451–1459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Lewbel, A. (1987b), Fractional demand systems, Journal of Econometrics 36: 311–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Lewbel, A. (1988), An exactly aggregable trigonometric Engel curve demand system, Econometric Reviews 2: 97–102.Google Scholar
  51. Lewbel, A. (1989a), A demand system rank theorem, Econometrica 57: 701–705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Lewbel, A. (1989b), Nesting the AIDS and translog demand systems, International Economic Review 30: 349–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Lewbel, A. (1990), Full rank demand systems, International Economic Review 31: 289–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Lewbel, A. (1991), The rank of demand systems: Theory and nonparametric estimation, Econometrica 59: 711–730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Lewbel, A. (2003), A rational rank four demand system, Journal of Applied Econometrics 18: 127–134. Corrected mimeo, July 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Lopez, R. (1983), Structural implications of a class of flexible functional forms for profit functions, International Economic Review 26: 593–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Muellbauer, J. (1975), Aggregation, variable cost distribution and consumer demand, Review of Economic Studies 42: 525–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Muellbauer, J. (1976), Community preferences and the representative consumer, Econometrica 44: 979–999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Pope, R.D., Chavas, J.-P. (1994), Cost functions under production uncertainty, American Journal of Agricultural Economics 76: 196–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Pope, R.D., Just, R.E. (1996), Empirical implementation of ex ante cost functions, Journal of Econometrics 72: 231–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Phlips, L. (1974), Applied Consumption Analysis, New York: North Holland.Google Scholar
  62. Russell, T. (1983), On a theorem of Gorman, Economic Letters 11: 223–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Russell, T. (1996), Gorman demand systems and lie transformation groups: A reply, Economic Letters 51: 201–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Russell, T., Farris, R. (1993), The geometric structure of some systems of demand functions, Journal of Mathematical Economics 22: 309–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Russell, T., Farris, R. (1998), Integrability, Gorman systems, and the lie bracket structure of the real line, Journal of Mathematical Economics 29: 183–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Shumway, C.R. (1983), Supply, demand, and technology in a multiproduct industry: Texas field crops, American Journal of Agricultural Economics 65: 748–760.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. van Daal, J., Merkies, A.H.Q.M. (1989), A note on the quadratic expenditure model, Econometrica 57: 1439–1443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Wales, T.J., Woodland, A.D. (1988), Estimation of consumer demand systems with binding non-negativity constraints, Journal of Econometrics 21: 263–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • V. Eldon Ball
    • 1
  • Ricardo Cavazos
    • 2
  • Jeffrey LaFrance
    • 3
  • Rulon Pope
    • 4
  • Jesse Tack
    • 5
  1. 1.U.S. Department of AgricultureEconomic Research ServiceWashingtonUSA
  2. 2.Organization for Economic Cooperation and DevelopmentParisFrance
  3. 3.School of Economic SciencesWashington State UniversityPullmanUSA
  4. 4.Department of EconomicsBrigham Young UniversityProvoUSA
  5. 5.Department of Agricultural EconomicsMississippi State UniversityMississippi StateUSA

Personalised recommendations