Skip to main content

WTO Compliance and Domestic Farm Policy Change

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover The Economic Impact of Public Support to Agriculture

Part of the book series: Studies in Productivity and Efficiency ((SIPE,volume 7))

  • 1063 Accesses

Abstract

The establishment of the WTO in 1995 posed a challenge for the conduct of domestic farm policies. Both the levels of support and the instruments used were constrained by the Agreement on Agriculture and other parts of the Uruguay Round Agreement. This chapter explores the experience of the period since 1995 to see to what extent the WTO commitments have shaped domestic farm policies, particularly in the United States and the European Union. This influence can come about either through the negotiated constraints on policy outcomes or through the litigation of complaints by other countries. Notifications of domestic support levels show little direct impact on US farm policy but the outcome of litigation has had some influence on policy choices. In the European Union, the reform of the CAP has been much more influenced by WTO subsidy constraints but somewhat less by litigation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Blandford, D., Josling, T. (2008), The WTO July 10th Agricultural Modalities Proposals and their Impact on Domestic Support in the EU and the US, Paper Available from Authors), July 11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Josling, T., Swinbank, A. (2008), EU Domestic Support Notifications, Presented at the conference on Improving WTO Transparency: Shadow Domestic Support Notifications, International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington DC, March 12.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMahon, J.A. (2007), Trade Policy Reform through Litigation, EuroChoices, Volume 6(2), pp. 42–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steinberg, R.H., Josling, T.E. (2003), When the peace ends: The vulnerability of EU and U.S. agricultural subsidies to WTO legal challenge, Journal of International Economic Law 6(2): 369–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swinbank, A. (2007), WTO Challenges to Mr. Fischler’s CAP, Paper Presented at a Conference on Agricultural Policy Changes: Canada, EU and the World Trade Organization, University of Victoria, Canada, September.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swinbank, A., Tranter, R. (2005), Decoupling EU farm support: Does the new single payment scheme fit within the green box? The Estey Centre Journal of International Law and Trade Policy 6(1): 47–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Trade Organization. (1995), The Results of the Uruguay Round of Multilateral Trade Negotiations: The Legal Texts, WTO, Geneva.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Trade Organization. (1997), European Communities – Regime for the Importation, Sale and Distribution of Bananas, Reports of the Panels, WT/DS27/R/USA, WT/DS27/R/ECU, WT/DS27/R/GTM, WT/DS27/R/MEX.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Trade Organization. (1999), Canada – Measures Affecting the Importation of Milk and the Exportation of Dairy Products, WT/DS103/R and WT/DS113/R, WTO, Geneva.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Trade Organization. (2001), Canada – Measures Affecting the Importation of Milk and the Exportation of Dairy Products, Report of the Appellate Body, WT/DS103&113/AB/RW, WTO, Geneva.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Trade Organization. (2004a), European Communities – Export Subsidies on Sugar, Reports of the Panels, WT/DS265/R, WT/DS266/R, & WT/DS283/R, WTO, Geneva.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Trade Organization. (2004b), United States – Subsidies on Upland Cotton, Report of the Panel, WT/DS267/R, WTO, Geneva.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Trade Organization. (2005a), European Communities – Export Subsidies on Sugar, Report of the Appellate Body, WT/DS265/AB/R, WT/DS266/AD/R, & WT/DS283/AB/R, WTO, Geneva.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Trade Organization. (2005b), United States – Subsidies on Upland Cotton, Reports of the Appellate Body, WT/DS265/AB/R, WT/DS266/AB/R, & WT/DS267/AB/R, WTO, Geneva.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Trade Organization. (2008), Revised Draft Modalities for Agriculture, TN/AG/W/4/Rev.3, WTO, Geneva, 10 July.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tim Josling .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Josling, T. (2010). WTO Compliance and Domestic Farm Policy Change. In: Ball, V., Fanfani, R., Gutierrez, L. (eds) The Economic Impact of Public Support to Agriculture. Studies in Productivity and Efficiency, vol 7. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6385-7_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics