Soil: A Media for Plant Growth

  • M. H. Ali


The role of soil in the soil–plant–atmosphere Continuum is unique. Although soil is not essential for plant growth and indeed plants can be grown hydroponically (in a liquid culture), usually plants are grown in the soil, and soil properties directly affect the availability of water and nutrients to plants. Soil water affects plant growth directly through its controlling effect on plant water status and indirectly through its effect on aeration, temperature, nutrient transport, uptake, and transformation. The knowledge of soil-water status and its movement in soil is important and has practical implications in agricultural, environmental, and hydrological situations. Soil-water movement in the field depends on the hydraulic properties of the soil. The understanding of these properties is helpful in good irrigation design and management.


Hydraulic Conductivity Cation Exchange Capacity Infiltration Rate Volumetric Water Content Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Ali MH, Turral HN (2000) Behavior study of cracking clay soil. I. Hydraulic and swelling properties. J Inst Engrs Bangladesh 27/AE(1):9–18Google Scholar
  2. Ali MH, Turral HN (2001) Determination of soil moisture at low tension by constant head technique. Bangladesh J Agri Engg 12(1&2):63–68Google Scholar
  3. Amoozegar A (1989a) A compact constant-head permeameter for measuring saturated hydraulic conductivity of the vadose zone. Soil Sci Soc Am J 53:1356–1361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Amoozegar A (1989b) Comparison of the Glover solution with the simultaneous equations approach for measuring hydraulic conductivity. Soil Sci Soc Am J 53:1362–1367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Amoozegar A, Warrick AW (1986) Hydraulic conductivity of saturated soils: Field methods. In: Topp CG et al. (eds) Advances in measurement of soil physical properties: Bringing theory into practice. Soil Sci Soc Am Spe Publication no. 30, Soil Sci Soc Am, Madison, WI, pp 735–770Google Scholar
  6. Amoozegar A (1992) Compact constant head permeameter: A convenient device for measuring hydraulic conductivity. In: Topp et al. CG (ed) Advances in measurement of soil physical properties: Bringing theory to practices. Soil Sci Soc Am Spe. Publication no. 30, Soil Sci Soc Am, Madison, WI, pp 31–42Google Scholar
  7. Arya LM, Paris JF (1981) A physic-emperical model to predict the soil moisture characteristic from particle-size distribution and bulk density data. Soil Sci Soc Am J 45:1023–1030CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Baker JM, Lascano RJ (1989) The spatial sensitivity of time-domain reflectometry. Soil Sci 147:378–384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Beven K, German P (1982) Macropores and water flow in soils. Water Resour Res 18:1311–1325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bouma J, Dekker LW, Wosten JHM (1978) A case study on infiltration into dry clay soil. II. Physical measurements. Geoderma 20:41–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bronswijk JJB (1988) Modeling of water balance, cracking and subsidence of clay soils. J Hydrol 97:199–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bronswijk JJB (1989) Prediction of actual cracking and subsidence in clay soils. Soil Sci 148(2):87–93Google Scholar
  13. Brasher BR, Franzmeier DP, Valassis V, Daidson SE (1966) Use of saran resin to coat natural soil clods for bulk-density and water-retention measurements. Soil Sci 101(2):108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Brooks RH, Corey AT (1964) Hydraulic properties of porous media. Hydrology paper no. 3, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA, p 27Google Scholar
  15. Buckingham E (1907) Studies on the movement of soil moisture. Bulletin 38, USDA Bureau of SoilsGoogle Scholar
  16. Campbell GS (1974) A simple method for determining unsaturated conductivity from moisture retention data. Soil Sci 117(6):311–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cassel DK, Nielsen DR (1986) Field capacity and available water capacity. In: Klute A (ed) Methods of soil analysis. Part 1. ASA-ASSS, Madison, Wis, pp 901–926Google Scholar
  18. Collis-George N (1977) Infiltration equation for simple soil systems. Water Resour Res 13(2):395–403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Donahue RL, Miller RW, Schickluna JC (1977) Soils – An Introduction to soils and plant growth. Prentice-Hall, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  20. Dunne T, Ditrich WE (1980) Experimental study of Horton overflow on tropical hill slopes. I. Soil conditions, infiltration and frequency of runoff. Z Geomorphol N F Suppl 35:40–59Google Scholar
  21. Feddes RA, Kowalik PJ, Zaradny (1978) Simulation of field water use and crop yield. Simulation Monograph. Pudoc, Wageningen. 189 ppGoogle Scholar
  22. Federer CA, Turcotte DE, Smith CT (1993) The organic fraction – bulk density relationship and expression of nutrient content in forest soils. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 23:1026–1032CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Green WH, Ampt G (1911) Studies of soil physics, part 1. The flow of air and water through soils. J Ag Sci 4:1–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gupta SC, Larson WE (1979) Estimating soil water retention characteristics from particle size distribution, organic matter content and bulk density. Water Resource Research 15(6):1633–1635CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Heimovaara TJ, Bouten W (1990) A computer-controlled 36-channel time domain reflectometry system for monitoring soil water contents. Water Resour Res 26:2311–2316Google Scholar
  26. Hillel D (1980) Fundamentals of soil physics. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  27. Hillel D, Krentos VD, Stylianou Y (1972) Procedure and test of an internal drainage method for measuring soil hydraulic characteristics in situ. Soil Sci 144(5):395–400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Horton RE (1939) An approach toward a physical interpretation of infiltration capacity. Soil Sci Soc Am Proc 5:399–417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. ISSS (International Society of Soil Science) (1963) Soil Physics Terminology, Commission I (Soil Physics), International Society of Soil Science, Bulletin No. 23Google Scholar
  30. Kostiakov AN (1932) On the dynamics of the coefficient of water-percolation in soils and on the necessity for studying it from a dynamic point of view for purposes of amelioration. Trans 6th Com Intern Soc Soil Sci Russian Part A, pp. 17–21Google Scholar
  31. Ledieu J, Clerck PD, Dautrebande S (1986) A method of measuring soil moisture by time domain reflectometry. J Hydrol 88:319–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Malicki MA, Skierucha W (1989) A manually controlled TDR soil moisture meter operating with 300 ps rise-time needle pulse. Irrigation Sci 10:153–163Google Scholar
  33. McGarry D, Malafant KWJ (1987) The analysis of volume change in unconfined units of soil. Soil Sci Soc Am J 51:290–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mein RG, Larson CL (1973) Modeling infiltration during a steady rain. Water Resour Res 9(2):384–394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Miller RD, Bresler E (1977) A quick method for estimating soil water diffusivity function. Soil Sci Soc Am J 41:1020–1022CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Mualem Y (1976) A new model for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated porous media. Water Resour Res 12:513–522CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Nelder JA (1962) An alternative form of a generalized logistic equation. Biometrics 18:614–616CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Passioura JB (1976) Determining soil water diffusivities from one-step outflow experiments. Australian J Soil Res 15(1):1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Perroux KM, White I (1988) Designs for disc permeameters unsaturated porous media. Soil Sci Soc Am J 52:1205–1215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Philip JR (1957a) The theory of infiltration. Part I. Soil Sci 83:345–357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Philip JR (1957b) The theory of infiltration. Part 4. Soil Sci 84:257–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Philip JR (1958) Theory of infiltration. Part7. Soil Sci 87:333–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Philip JR (1969) Theory of infiltration. Advan Hydrosci 5:215–296Google Scholar
  44. Richards LA (1931) Capillary conduction of liquids through porous medium. Physics 1:318–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Richards LA (1965) Physical conditions of water in soil. In: Black CA et al. (eds.) Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 1: Agronomy, vol 9, American Society of Agronomy, Madison, pp 128–151Google Scholar
  46. Risinger WM (1984) Comparing wetted profiles of surge flow vs. continuous flow irrigation methods. V: 1–17. In: Proceedings of the Surge Flow Conference, Texas A & M University, Midland, TexasGoogle Scholar
  47. Rivers ED, Shipp RF (1978) Soil water retention as related to particle size in selected sands and loamy sands. Soil Sci 126(2):94–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Rose DA (1968) Water movement in porous materials III. Evaporation of water from soil. British J Appl Phy 1(2):1779–1791Google Scholar
  49. Sentek (2007) Diviner 2000 user guide. Sentek technologiesGoogle Scholar
  50. Shaw BT, Baver LD (1939). Heat conductivity as an index of soil moisture. Agron J 31:886–891CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Swartzendruber D (1997) Exact mathematical deviation of a two-term infiltration. Water Resour Res 33(3):491–496CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Tariq A, Durnford DS (1993) Soil volumetric shrinkage measurement: A simple method. Soil Sci 155(5):325–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Troxler Inc. (1996) Manual of operation and instruction, Model 4300 Depth Moisture Gauge. Troxler Electronic Lab., Inc. North Carolina, USAGoogle Scholar
  54. Van Genuchten MTh (1980) A closed-form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J 44:892–898CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. van Bavel EHM, Brust KJ, Stirk GB (1968) Hydraulic properties of a clay loam soil and the field measurement of water uptake by roots. II: The water balance of the root zone. Soil Sci Soc Am Proc 32:317–321Google Scholar
  56. Watson KK (1966) An instantaneous profile method for determining hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated porous media. Water Resour Res 2:709–715CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Williams J, Ross PJ, Bristow KL (1992) Prediction of the Campbell water retention function from texture, structure and organic matter. In: Van M Th et al. (eds) Proceedings on the Internationl Workshop on “Indirect Methods for Estimating the Hydraulic Properties of Unsaturated Soils,” University of California, Riverside, CA, pp 424–442Google Scholar
  58. Wösten JHM, van Genuchten MTh (1988) Using texture and other soil properties to predict the unsaturated soil hydraulic properties. Soil Sci Soc Am J 52(6):1762–1770CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. H. Ali
    • 1
  1. 1.Agricultural Engineering DivisionBangladesh Institute of Nuclear AgricultureMymensinghBangladesh

Personalised recommendations