Advertisement

Bernard Roy

  • Denis Bouyssou
  • Daniel Vanderpooten
Chapter
Part of the International Series in Operations Research & Management Science book series (ISOR, volume 147)

Abstract

During the1950s and early 1960s, as the ideas, methods, and applications of operations research (OR) spread around the world, each country tended to adapt OR to fit its professional, academic, and cultural environments. Often, there were a few dedicated persons who led the way and became recognized as the country’s OR pioneers. In the case of France, such a person was Bernard Roy. After a first career as a consultant, during which he made major breakthroughs in graph theory and project scheduling, he started a second career as an academic interested in multiple criteria decision making (MCDM). Among his many achievements, he is the developer of the activity on node project scheduling technique and of the famous ELECTRE methods for resolving decision problems with multiple criteria. Through his research, teaching, consulting, and service to the community, he has been one of the major promoters of OR in France.

Keywords

Operation Research Project Schedule Multiple Criterion Decision Multiple Criterion Decision Making Concordance Condition 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Benayoun R, Roy B, Sussmann G (1966) ELECTRE: Une méthode pour guider le choix en présence de points de vue multiples. Note de travail 49, SEMA (Metra International), Direction Scientifique)Google Scholar
  2. Berge C (1958) Théorie des Graphes et ses Applications. Dunod, ParisGoogle Scholar
  3. Bertier P, Roy B (1965) Une procédure de résolution pour une classe de problèmes pouvant avoir un caractère combinatoire. ICC Bull 4:19–28Google Scholar
  4. Bouyssou D, Jacquet-Lagrèze É, Perny P, Slowinski R, Vanderpooten D, Vincke Ph (2002) (eds) Aiding decisions with multiple criteria: essays in honor of Bernard Roy. Kluwer, Boston, MAGoogle Scholar
  5. Busacker R, Gowen P (1961) A procedure for determining a family of minimal-cost network flow patterns. Operations Research Office Technical Report 15, J. Hopkins University, Baltimore, MDGoogle Scholar
  6. Churchman C, Ackoff R, Arnoff E (1957) Introduction to operations research. Wiley, New York, NY. French translation: Eléments de recherche opérationnelle. Dunod, Paris, (1961)Google Scholar
  7. Figueira J, Mousseau V, Roy B (2005) ELECTRE methods. In: Figueira J, Greco S, Ehrgott M (eds) Multiple criteria decision analysis: state of the art surveys. Springer, Boston, MA, pp 133–162Google Scholar
  8. Fondahl J (1961) A non-computer approach to the critical path method for the construction industry. Technical report 9, Department of Civil Engineering, Stanford UniversityGoogle Scholar
  9. Hansen P, de Werra D (2002) Connectivity, transitivity and chromaticity: the pioneering work of Bernard Roy in graph theory. In: Bouyssou D, Jacquet-Lagrèze E, Perny P, Slowinski R, Vanderpooten D, Vincke Ph. (eds) Aiding decisions with multiple criteria: essays in honor of Bernard Roy. Kluwer, Boston, MA, pp 23–42Google Scholar
  10. LAMSADE (2009) http://www.lamsade.dauphine.fr/~roy/roy_publications.htm. Accessed 14 Sept, 2009
  11. Lesourne J (1958) Techniques économiques et gestion industrielle, Dunod, ParisGoogle Scholar
  12. Roy B (1957) Recherche d’un programme d’approvisionnement ou de production. Revue de Recherche Opérationnelle 1(4): 172–184Google Scholar
  13. Roy B (1958) Sur quelques propriétés des graphes fortement connexes. Comptes rendus de l’Académie des Sciences 247:399–401Google Scholar
  14. Roy B (1959a). Contribution de la théorie des graphes à l’étude de certains problèmes linéaires. Comptes rendus de l’Académie des Sciences 248:2437–2439Google Scholar
  15. Roy B (1959b). Transitivité et connexité. Comptes rendus des séances de l’Académie des Sciences 249(6):216–218Google Scholar
  16. Roy B (1961) Cheminement et connexité dans les graphes—Application aux problèmes d'ordonnancement. Doctorat d’État de Sciences Mathématiques, Faculté des Sciences de ParisGoogle Scholar
  17. Roy B (1962) Graphes et ordonnancement. Revue Française de Recherche Opérationnelle (25/4e trimestre):323–333Google Scholar
  18. Roy, B (1963) Programmation mathématique et description segmentée. Revue METRA 2(4):523–535Google Scholar
  19. Roy B (1967) Nombre chromatique et plus longs chemins d’un graphe. RIRO 1(5):129–132Google Scholar
  20. Roy B (1968) Classement et choix en présence de points de vue multiples (la méthode ELECTRE). RIRO 2(8):57–75Google Scholar
  21. Roy B (1969a) Procédure d’exploration par séparation et évaluation (PSEP et PSES). RIRO 3(V-1):61–90Google Scholar
  22. Roy B (1969b). Graphe partiel s-connexe extremum. Revue Roumaine de Mathématiques Pures et Appliquées 14(9):1355–1368Google Scholar
  23. Roy B (1969c). Algèbre moderne et théorie des graphes orientées vers les sciences économiques et sociales: Volume 1: Notions et résultats fondamentaux. Dunod, Paris.Google Scholar
  24. Roy B (1970) Algèbre moderne et théorie des graphes orientées vers les sciences économiques et sociales: Volume 2: Applications et problèmes spécifiques, Dunod, ParisGoogle Scholar
  25. Roy B (1971) Problems and methods with mutiple objective functions, Math Program 1(2):239–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Roy B (1975a). Vers une méthodologie générale d’aide à la décision. Revue METRA 14(3):459–497Google Scholar
  27. Roy B (ed.) (1975b). Combinatorial programming: methods and applications. D. Reidel, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  28. Roy B (1977) Partial preference analysis and decision-aid: the fuzzy outranking relation concept. In: Bell D, Keeney R, Raiffa H (eds) Conflicting objectives in decisions. Wiley, New York, NY, pp 40–75Google Scholar
  29. Roy B. (1978) ELECTRE III: Un algorithme de classements fondé sur une représentation floue des préférences en présence de critères multiples. Cahiers du Centre d’études de Recherche Opérationnelle 20(1):3–24Google Scholar
  30. Roy B (1981) The optimisation problem formulation: Criticism and overstepping. J Oper Res Soc 32(6):427–436Google Scholar
  31. Roy B (1985) Méthodologie multicritère d’aide à la décision. Economica, Paris. (English translation: Multicriteria methodology for decision analysis. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1996. Polish and Spanish translations are also available)Google Scholar
  32. Roy B (1987) Meaning and validity of interactive procedures as tools for decision making. Eur J Oper Res 31(3):297–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Roy B (1988) Des critères multiples en Recherche Opérationnelle: Pourquoi? In: Rand G (ed.) Operational research ’87. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 829–842Google Scholar
  34. Roy B (1989) Main sources of inaccurate determination, uncertainty and imprecision in decision models. Math Comput Model 12(10/11):1245–1254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Roy B (1990) Decision-aid and decision-making. Eur J Oper Res 45(2–3):324–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Roy B (1991) The outranking approach and the foundations of ELECTRE methods. Theory Decis 31(1):49–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Roy B (1993) Decision science or decision-aid science? Eur J Oper Res 66(2):184–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Roy B (1998) A missing link in OR-DA: robustness analysis. Foundations Comput Decis Sci 23(3):141–160Google Scholar
  39. Roy B (2006) Regard historique sur la place de la recherche opérationnelle et de l'aide à la décision en France. Mathématiques et Sciences Humaines 175:25–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Roy B (2010) Robustness in operational research and decision aiding: a multi-faceted issue. Eur J Oper Res 200(3):629–638CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Roy B, Bertier P (1973) La méthode ELECTRE II—Une application au média-planning. In: Ross M (ed.) OR ’72. North-Holland, Amsterdam, 291–302Google Scholar
  42. Roy B, Bouyssou D (1993) Aide multicritère à la décision: Méthodes et cas. Economica, ParisGoogle Scholar
  43. Roy B, Dibon M (1966) L’ordonnancement par la méthode des potentiels—Le programme CONCORD. Automatisme 2:1–11Google Scholar
  44. Roy B, Hugonnard J-C (1982) Ranking of suburban line extension projects on the Paris metro system by a multicriteria method. Trans Res 16A(4):301–312Google Scholar
  45. Roy B, Simonnard M (1961) Nouvelle méthode permettant d’explorer un ensemble de possibilités et de déterminer un optimum. Revue Française de Recherche Opérationnelle (18/1etrimestre):15–54Google Scholar
  46. Roy B, Vanderpooten D (1996) The European school of MCDA: Emergence, basic features and current works. J Multi Criteria Decis Anal 5(1):22–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Roy B, Vincke P (1984) Relational systems of preference with one or more pseudo-criteria: some new concepts and results. Manage Sci 30(11):1323–1335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Warshall S (1962) A theorem on Boolean matrices. J ACM 9(1):11–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Denis Bouyssou
    • 1
  • Daniel Vanderpooten
    • 2
  1. 1.Centre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueParisFrance
  2. 2.Université Paris-DauphineParisFrance

Personalised recommendations