Policy Implications of Attachment Processes in Adulthood: Caregiving and Family Preservation

  • Joyce E. Everett
Part of the Essential Clinical Social Work Series book series (ECSWS)


Attachment theory originated from Bowlby’s (1969/1982) clinical observations about the real life experiences of institutionalized children, and the initial policy changes that emerged out of his concerns focused on improving child care (Rutter, 2008). In collaboration with his social work colleague, John Robertson, Bowlby’s early work had major impact on public health when his analysis of Robertson’s films of hospitalized children was presented to the World Health Organization (WHO) in 1951. Public policy was eventually altered in response to the presentation’s emphasis on the negative reactions of children separated from parents for medical treatment or residential care (Bowlby, 1951; Robertson & Robertson, 1971). Subsequent attachment research has continued to influence the development of child welfare policies over the past half century (Rutter, 2008), and primary focus has remained on the needs of children. Little attention has been given to the attachment needs of adults, yet all family policies inevitably affect the emotional well-being and attachment systems of adults as well. This chapter highlights the interface of attachment and current social welfare policies from the standpoint of adults.


Child Welfare Foster Care Attachment Style Attachment Relationship Military Family 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Ainsworth, M. (1968). Object relations, dependency, and attachment: A theoretical view of the infant-mother relationship. Child Development, 40, 969–1025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ainsworth, M. (1973). The development of infant-mother attachment. In J. L. Gewirtz (Ed.), Attachment and dependency (pp. 97–137). Washington, DC: V. H. Winston.Google Scholar
  3. American Law Institute (ALI). (2002). Principles of the law of family dissolution: Analysis and recommendations. Newark, NJ: LexisNexis.Google Scholar
  4. American Psychological Association. (n.d.) Elder abuse and neglect: In search of solutions. Retrieved from
  5. Austrian, S. (2008). Developmental theories through the life cycle (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Banach, M. (1998). The best interests of the child: Decision-making factors. Families in Society, 79(3), 331–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Beckett, J. (2008). Lifting our voices: The journeys into family caregiving of professional social workers. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Bowlby, J. (1951). Maternal care and mental health. Geneva: World Health Organization.Google Scholar
  9. Bowlby, J. (1958). The nature of the child’s tie to his mother. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 39, 350–373.Google Scholar
  10. Bowlby, J. (1969/1982). Attachment and loss: Vol. 1. Attachment. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  11. Bowlby, J. (1988). A secure base: Parent-child attachment and healthy human development. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  12. Chambers, D. (2005). Social policy and social programs: A method for the practical public policy analyst (4th ed.). New York, NY: Macmillan Publishing.Google Scholar
  13. Child Welfare League of America (CWLA). (2009). National Data Analysis System. Retrieved from
  14. Chipungu, S. (1997). A value-based policy framework. In J. Everett, B. Leashore, & S. Chipungu (Eds.), Child welfare: An africentric perspective (pp. 290–305). New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Drummet, A., Coleman, M., & Cable, S. (2003). Military families under stress: Implications for family life education. Family Relations, 52(3), 279–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Evan B. Donaldson Institute (March, 2006). Expanding resources for children: Is adoption by gays and lesbians part of the answer for boys and girls who need homes? Retrieved from
  17. Feinberg, L., & Newman, D. (2006). Preliminary experiences of the states in implementing the National Family Caregiver Support Program: A 50-state study. Journal of Aging and Social Policy, 18(3), 95–113.Google Scholar
  18. Flynn, J. (1985). Social agency policy: Analysis and presentation for community practice. Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall.Google Scholar
  19. Fonagy, P. (2003). The development of psychopathology from infancy to adulthood: The mysterious unfolding of disturbance in time. Infant Mental Health Journal, 24(3), 212–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Garey, A., Hansen, K., Hertz, R., & MacDonald, C. (2002). Care and kinship: An introduction. Journal of Family Issues, 23(6), 703–712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gauthier, Y., Fortin, G., & Jeliu, G. (2004). Clinical application of attachment theory in permanency planning for children in foster care: The importance of continuity of care. Infant Mental Health Journal, 25(4), 379–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gilbert, N., & Terrell, P. (2005). Dimensions of social welfare policy (6th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.Google Scholar
  23. Glaze, L., & Maruschak, L. (2008). Parents in prison and their minor children (NCJ 222984). Washington, DC: US Department of Justice.Google Scholar
  24. Goldstein, J., Freud, A., & Solnit, A. (1973). Beyond the best interests of the child. New York, NY: Free Press.Google Scholar
  25. Goldstein, J., Freud, A., & Solnit, A. (1979). Before the best interests of the child. New York, NY: Free Press.Google Scholar
  26. Goldstein, J., Solnit, A., Goldstein, S., & the Estate of Anna Freud. (1996). Best interests of the child. The least detrimental alternative. New York, NY: Free Press.Google Scholar
  27. Government Accountability Office. (2002, September 18). Military personnel: Active duty benefits reflect changing demographics, but opportunities exist to improve (GAO Publication No. GAO-02-935). Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  28. Greenberg, R. (2006). Children and families: Mothers who are incarcerated. Women and Therapy, 29(3/4), 165–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hare, J., & Skinner, D. (2008). “Whose child is this?”: Determining legal status for lesbian parents who used assisted reproductive technologies. Family Relations, 57(3), 365–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hazan, C., & Shaver, P. (1990). Love and work: An attachment-theoretical perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(3), 511–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Human Rights Campaign (HRC). (2010a). Marriage equality and other relationship recognition laws. Retrieved from
  32. Human Rights Campaign (HRC). (2010b). Parenting laws: Joint adoption. Retrieved from
  33. Jelinek, P. (2009, March 18). Pentagon phasing out “stop-loss” policy. Huffington Post. Retrieved from
  34. Kelly, R., & Ward, S. (2002). Allocating custodial responsibilities at divorce: Social science research and the American Law Institute’s approximation rule. Family Court Review, 40(3), 350–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kenyon, G., Chong, K., Enkoff-Sage, M., Hill, C., Mays, C., & Rochelle, L. (2003). Public adoption by gay and lesbian parents in North Carolina: Policy and Practice. Families in Society, 84(4), 571–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Loper, A., & Tuerk, E. (2006). Parenting programs for incarcerated parents: Current research and future directions. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 17(4), 407–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lubold, G. (2009, March 20). Gates lightens load for war-worn forces. Christian Science Monitor. Retrieved from
  38. Luke, K. (2002). Mitigating the ill effects of maternal incarceration on women in prison and their children. Child Welfare, 81(6), 929–948.Google Scholar
  39. Mann, B. (2008, May 26) Military moms face tough choices. National Public Radio. Retrieved
  40. Moroney, R. (1998). Caring and competent caregivers. Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press.Google Scholar
  41. Moye, J., & Rinker, R. (2002). It’s a hard knock life: Does the Adoption and Safe Families Act of 1997 adequately address problems in the child welfare system. Harvard Journal on Legislation, 39(2), 375–394.Google Scholar
  42. Nieto, M. (2002). In danger of falling through the cracks: Children of arrested parents. Sacramento, CA: California Research Bureau, California State Library.Google Scholar
  43. Park, R., & Clarke-Stewart, A. (2003). The effects of parental incarceration on children: Perspectives, promises and policies. In J. Travis & M. Waul (Eds.), Prisoners once removed (pp. 189–232). Washington, DC: The Urban Institute Press.Google Scholar
  44. Patterson, C. (1994). Children of the lesbian baby boom: Behavioral adjustments, self-concepts and sex role identity. In B. Green & G. M. Herek (Eds.), Lesbian and gay psychology: Theory, research and clinical applications (pp. 156–75). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  45. Pecora, P., Whittaker, J., & Maluccio, A. (1992). The child welfare challenge: Policy, practice and research. New York, NY: Aldine de Gruyter Publishers.Google Scholar
  46. Poehlmann, J., Shlafer, R., Maes, E., & Hanneman, A. (2008). Factors associated with young children’s opportunities for maintaining family relationships during maternal incarceration. Family Relations, 57, 267–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Pruett, M., Hogan-Bruen, K., & Jackson, T. (2000). The best interests of the child: Parents’ versus attorney’s perspectives. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage, 33(1/2), 47–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Putnam, F. (2005). The developmental neurobiology of disrupted attachment: Lessons from animal models and child abuse research. In L. Berlin, Y. Ziv, L. Amaya-Jackson, & M. Greenberg (Eds.), Enhancing early attachments: Theory, research, intervention, and policy (pp. 79–99). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  49. Riggs, S. (2005). Is the approximation rule in the child’s best interests? A critique from the perspective of attachment theory. Family Court Review, 43(3), 481–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Robertson, J., & Robertson, J. (1971). Young children in brief separation: A fresh look. Psychoanalytic Study of the Child, 26, 264–315.Google Scholar
  51. Rutter, M. (2008). Implications of attachment theory and research for child care policies. In J. Cassidy & P. Shaver (Eds.), Handbook of attachment: Theory, research, and clinical applications (2nd ed., pp. 958–974). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  52. Ryan, S., Pearlmutter, S., & Groza, V. (2004). Coming out of the closet: Opening agencies to gay and lesbian adoptive parents. Social Work, 49(1), 85–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Sabol, W., Minton, T., & Harrison, P. (2007). Prison and jail inmates at midyear 2006. Bureau of Justice Statistics Bulletin (NCJ 217675). Washington, DC: US Department of Justice.Google Scholar
  54. Sametz, L. (1980). Children of incarcerated women. Social Work, 25(4), 298–303.Google Scholar
  55. Schneider, E. L. (1991). Attachment theory and research: Review of the literature. Clinical Social Work Journal, 19(3), 251–266.Google Scholar
  56. Shanker, T. (2009, March 18). ‘Stop-loss’ will all but end by 2011, Gates says. The New York Times. Retrieved from
  57. Stein, T. (1996). Child custody and visitation: The rights of lesbian and gay parents. Social Service Review, 70(3), 435–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Teisl, M., & Cicchetti, D. (2008). Physical abuse, cognitive and emotional processes, and aggressive/disruptive behavior problems. Social Development, 17(1), 1–23.Google Scholar
  59. Teti, D., & Ablard, K. (1989). Security of attachment and infant-sibling relationships: A laboratory study. Child Development, 60, 1519–1528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. U. S. Department of Health and Human Services. (1998). National Elder Abuse Incidence Study. (Grant No. 90-AM-0660). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  61. van IJzendoorn, M., & Sagi-Schwartz, A. (2008). Cross-cultural patterns of attachment: Universal and contextual dimensions. In J. Cassidy & P. Shaver (Eds.), The handbook of attachment: Theory, research, and clinical applications (2nd ed., pp. 880–905). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  62. Wainwright, J., Russell, S. T., & Patterson, C. J. (2004). Psychosocial adjustment, school outcomes, and romantic relationships of adolescents with same-sex parents. Child Development, 75(6), 1886–1898.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Welte, C. (1997). Detailed summary of the Adoption and Safe Families Act. Retrieved from
  64. Willemsen, E., Andrews, R., Karlin, B., & Willemsen, M. (2005). The ethics of the child custody process: Are the American Law Institute’s guidelines the answer? Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal, 22(2), 183–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Xu, Q. (2005). In the “best interest” of immigrant and refugee children: Deliberating on their unique circumstances. Child Welfare, 84(5), 747–770.Google Scholar
  66. Young, D., & Smith, C. (2000). When moms are incarcerated: The needs of children, mothers, and caregivers. Families in Society, 81(2), 130–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Smith College School for Social WorkNorthamptonUSA

Personalised recommendations