Abstarct
Status is the most direct link of individuals to social structures, connecting persons to divisions of labor in corporate units and to memberships in categoric units. When individuals know their status and the status of others in an encounter, it becomes much easier for them to understand the meanings of situational ecology and demography, to role-make and role-take, to plug into relevant cultural elements and normatize, to channel motive states in appropriate ways, and to manage emotions. Embedding of an encounter in corporate and categoric units increases the viability of an encounter through establishing the relative status of participants. Conversely, when status is unknown or ambiguous, individuals will need to work much harder to sustain the encounter because, without the capacity to find each other’s locations within corporate and categoric units, they must work to discover the meanings of situational ecology and demography, actively orchestrate gestures to make a role and read the gestures of others to role-take, search for cues about what elements of culture are relevant and appropriate, figure out what motive states are to be mobilized, and discover the feeling and display rules so as to emit the right mix of emotions.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Berger, J. 1958. “Relations Between Performance, Rewards, and Action-Opportunities in Small Groups.” Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation.
Berger, J., M. H. Fisek, R. Z. Norman, and M. Zelditch, Jr. 1977. Status Characteristics and Social Interaction: An Expectation-States Approach. New York: Elsevier.
Webster, M. and M. Foschi, Eds. 1998. Status Generalization: New Theory and Research. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Berger, J. and M. Zelditch, Eds. 1985. Status, Rewards, and Influence. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Berger, J. and M. Zelditch, Eds. 1998. Status, Power, and Legitimacy: Strategies and Theories. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
Wagner, D. G. and J. H. Turner. 1998. “Expectations States Theorizing.” In The Structure of Sociological Theory, 6th Edition, pp. 452–66. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth
Ridgeway, C. 1982. “Status in Groups: The Importance of Motivation.” American Sociological Review 47:76–88.
Ridgeway, C. L. and C. Johnson. 1990. “What is the Relationship Between Socioemotional Behavior and Status in Task Groups?” American Journal of Sociology 95:1189–212.
Berger, J., S. J. Roseholtz, and M. Zelditch, Jr. 1980. “Status Organizing Processes.” Annual Review of Sociology 6:479–508.
Norman, R. Z., R. Smith, and J. Berger. 1988. “The Processesing of Inconsistent Information.” In Status Generalization: New Theory and Research. M. Webster and M. Foschi, Eds. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Ridgeway, C. L. and J. Berger. 1986. “Expectations, legitimacy, and Dominance in Task Groups.” American Sociological Review 51:603–17.
Ridgeway, C. L. and J. Berger. 1988. “The Legitimation of Power and Prestige Orders in Task Groups.” In Status Generalization: New Theory and Research. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Clark, C. 1987. “Sympathy Biography and Sympathy Margin.” American Journal of Sociology 93:290–321.
Clark, C. 1990. Misery Loves Company: Sympathy in Everyday Life. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Ridgeway, C. 1998. “Where Do Status Beliefs Come From?” In Status, Network, and Structure. J Szmatka and J. Berger, Eds. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Ridgeway, C. 2001. “Inequality, Status, and the Construction of Status Beliefs.” In Handbook of Sociological Theory, J. Turner, Ed. New York: Kluwer/Plenum, pp. 323–42.
Ridgeway, C. 2006. “Status and Emotions From an Expectation States Theory.” In J. E. Stets and J. H. Turner, Eds. Handbook of The Sociology of Emotions. New York: Springer.
Ridgeway, C. and K. G. Erickson. 2000. “Creating and Spreading Status Beliefs.” American Journal of Sociology 106:579–615.
Ridgeway, C., E. Boyle, K. Kulpers, and D. Robinson. 1998. “How Do Status Beliefs Develop? The Role of Resources and Interaction.” American Sociological Review 63:331–50.
Homans, G. C. 1951. The Human Group. New York: Harcourt.
Ridgeway, C. 1994. “Affect.” In Group Processes: Sociological Analyses, M. Foschi and E. J. Lawler, Eds. Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall, pp. 205–30.
Collins, R. 1975. Conflict Sociology: Toward an Explanatory Science. New York: Academic.
Collins, R. 2004. Interaction Ritual Chains. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Maryanski, A. and J. H. Turner. 1992. The Social Cage: Human Nature and The Evolution of Society. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Turner, J. H. and A. Maryanski. 2008a. On The Origin of Societies by Natural Selection. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Press.
Boehm, C. 1993. Egalitarian Society and Reverse Dominance Hierarchy.” Current Anthropology 34:227–54.
Berger, J. 1988. “Directions in Expectation States Research.” In Status Generalization: New Theory and Research, M. Webster and M. Foschi, Eds. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Emerson, R. 1962. “Power-Dependence Relations.” American Sociological Review 17:31–41
Lovaglia, M. J. 1997. “Status Emotion, and Structural Power.” In Status, Network, and Structure, J. Skvoretz and J. Berger, Eds. New York: Guilford, pp. 159–78.
Lovaglia, M. J. and J. A. Houser. 1996. “Emotional Relations and Status in Groups.” American Sociological Review 61:867–83.
Houser, J. A. and M. J. Lovaglia. 2002. “Status, Emotion, and the Development of Solidarity in Stratified Task Groups. Advances in Group Processes 19:109–37.
Turner, J. H. 2010a. Theoretical Principles of Sociology, Volume I on Macrodynamics. New York: Springer.
Turner, J. H. 2011. Theoretical Principles of Sociology, Volume 3: Mesodynamics. New York: Springer.
Annett, J. and R. Collins. 1975. “A Short History of Deference and Demeanor.” In Conflict Sociology: Toward an Explanatory Science, R. Collins, Ed. New York: Academic.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Turner, J.H. (2010). Status Dynamics in Encounters. In: Theoretical Principles of Sociology, Volume 2. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6225-6_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6225-6_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-6224-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-6225-6
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawSocial Sciences (R0)