A New Developmental Foundation for David Shapiro’s Work on Autonomy and Character



My task in this volume is to discuss David Shapiro’s use of developmental theory in his ground breaking work on neurotic styles, as well as his more recent work on the treatment and the dynamics of rigid character. He writes explicitly about development in his two more recent books, Autonomy and Rigid Character (1981) and Dynamics of Character (2000), in which he argues that an abridgement of autonomy is an essential dynamic in all mental illness, and articulates how it manifests itself and functions in a range of diagnostic categories, which helps to clarify underlying dynamic similarities in the diverse symptomatology seen. I find Shapiro’s phenomenological descriptions of the ways in which abridgements of autonomy are manifested in ­different kinds of mental illness and his discussions of these dynamics highly ­illuminating. I also believe that autonomy or agency is an essential factor in organizing the psyche, but that it is only part of what is essential, so I will introduce another basic human bias or priority that when impaired is also operating to constrict personality. I will further argue that both of these essential priorities are present at birth, thus I cannot accept Shapiro’s assumption of the existence of prevolitional modes of functioning, and his further assumption that these modes are reverted to in adulthood when mental illness is manifested. He cites older stage theories of development, namely those of Werner and Piaget, as support for these assumptions, and possibly for notions of regression contained in such theories, although he does not use the term regression. I will also address his primary emphasis on cognition, which seems to leave little room for affects, except for the role of anxiety in evoking defensive organizations, and the presence of interest in expanding or constricting autonomy.


Negative Affect Affect State Negative Affect State Stage Theory Positive Affect State 


  1. Baillargeon, R. (1990).Young infants’ physical knowledge. Paper presented at the annual convention of the American Psychological Association, Boston.Google Scholar
  2. Bower, T. G. R. (1974). Development in infancy. San Francisco: Freeman Press.Google Scholar
  3. Brunner, J. 1968. Processes of cognitive growth. Worcester: Clark University Press.Google Scholar
  4. DeCasper, A. J., & Carstens, A. A. (1981). Contingencies of stimulation: Effects on learning and emotion in neonates. Infant Behavior and Development, 4, 19–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Demos, E. V. (1986). Crying in early infancy: An illustration of the motivational function of affect. In T. B. Brazelton & M. Yogman (Eds.), Affective development in early infancy (pp. 39–73). Norwood: Ablex.Google Scholar
  6. Demos, E. V. (1988). Affect and the development of the self: A new frontier. In A. Goldberg (Ed.), Frontiers in self psychology: Progress in self psychology (Vol. 3, pp. 27–53). Hillsdale: Analytic Press.Google Scholar
  7. Demos, E. V. (1989a). Resiliency in infancy. In T. F. Dugan & R. Coles (Eds.), The child in our time: Studies in the development of resiliency (pp. 3–22). New York: Brunner/Mazel.Google Scholar
  8. Demos, E. V. (1989b). A prospective constructionist view of development. Annual of Psychoanalysis, 17, 287–308.Google Scholar
  9. Demos, E. V. (1992). The early organization of the psyche. In J. W. Barron, M. N. Eagle, & E. L Wolitsky (Eds.), Interface of psychoanalysis and psychology (pp. 200–233). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Demos, E. V. (2007). The dynamics of development. In C. Piers, J. P. Muller, & J. Brent (Eds.), Self-organizing complexity in psychological systems (pp. 135–163). New York: Jason Aronson.Google Scholar
  11. Demos, E. V. (2008). Basic human priorities reconsidered. Annual of Psychoanalysis 36: 246–265.Google Scholar
  12. Donaldson, M. (1979). Children’s minds. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  13. Edelman, G. M. (1987). Neural Darwinism. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  14. Edelman, G. M. (1992). Bright air, brilliant fire: On the matter of the mind. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  15. Field, T. M., Woodson, R., Greenberg, R., & Cohen, D. (1982). Discrimination and imitation of facial expressions by neonates. Science, 218, 179–181.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fisher, K. W., & Pipp, S. L. (1984). Processes of cognitive development: Optimal level and skill acquisition. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Mechanisms of cognitive development (pp. 45–80). New York: Freeman Press.Google Scholar
  17. Gaensbauer, T. (1982). The differentiation of discrete affects. Psychoanalytic Study of the Child, 37, 29–65.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Ghent, E. (2002). Wish, need, drive: Motive in the light of dynamic systems theory and Edelman’s selectionist theory. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 12, 763–808.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Greenberg, J. (1991). Oedipus and beyond: A clinical theory. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Panksepp, J. (1999a). Emotions as viewed by psychoanalysis and neuroscience: An exercise in consilience. Neuro-Psychoanalysis, 1(1), 15–39.Google Scholar
  21. Panksepp, J. (1999b). Drives, affects, Id energies and the neuroscience of emotions: Response to commentaries. Neuro-Psychoanalysis, 1(1), 69–89.Google Scholar
  22. Piaget, J. (1967). Six psychological studies. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  23. Sander, L. (1969). Regulation and organization in the early infant-caregiver system. In R. J. Robinson, (Ed.), Brain and early development (Vol. 1, pp. 311–332). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  24. Sander, L. (1975). Infant and caretaking environment: Investigation and conceptualization of adaptive behavior in a system of increasing complexity. In E. J. Anthony, (Ed.), Explorations in child psychiatry (pp. 126–166). New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  25. Sander, L. (1982). The inner experience of the infant: A framework for inference relevant to ­development of the sense of self. Paper presented at the 13th Margaret S. Mahler Symposium, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
  26. Sander, L. (1985). Toward a logic of organization in psychobiologic development. In H. Klar & L. Siever (Eds.), Biologic response cycles: Clinical implications (pp. 19–37). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press.Google Scholar
  27. Shapiro, D. (1981). Autonomy and rigid character. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  28. Shapiro, D. (2000). Dynamics of character. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  29. Tomkins, S. S. (1962). Affect, imagery, consciousness: Vol. 1. The positive affects. New York: Springer Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  30. Tomkins, S. S. (1963). Affect, imagery, consciousness: Vol. 2. The negative affects. New York: Springer Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  31. Tomkins, S. S. (1978). Script theory: Differential magnification of affects. In H. E. Howe Jr. & R. A. Dunstbier (Eds.), Nebraska symposium on motivation (pp. 201–236). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
  32. Von Bertalanffy, L (1952). Problems of life: an evaluation of modern biological thought. Oxford, England.Google Scholar
  33. Weiss, P. (1949). The biological basis of adaption. In. Romano, John (Ed.). Adaptation, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, pp. 1–22.Google Scholar
  34. Winnicott, D. (1971). Playing and reality. London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
  35. Wolff, P. (1973). Organization of behavior in the first tress months of life. Association for Research on Nervous and Mental Disorders, 51, 132–153.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The Austen Riggs CenterStockbridgeUSA

Personalised recommendations