MPEG Video Compression Basics

  • B. G. Haskell
  • A. Puri


Video signals differ from image signals in several important characteristics. Of course the most important difference is that video signals have a camera frame rate of anywhere from 15 to 60 frames/s, which provides the illusion of smooth motion in the displayed signal.1 Another difference between images and video is the ability to exploit temporal redundancy as well as spatial redundancy in designing compression methods for video. For example, we can take advantage of the fact that objects in video sequences tend to move in predictable patterns, and can therefore be motion-compensated from frame-to-frame if we can detect the object and its motion trajectory over time.


Discrete Cosine Transform Motion Vector Video Code Motion Compensation Discrete Cosine Transform Coefficient 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    D. J. LeGall, “MPEG: A Video Compression Standard for Multimedia Applications,’’ Communications of the ACM, Vol. 34, No.4, April 1991, pp. 47–58.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    “Digital Video,” IEEE Spectrum, Vol. 29, No.3, March 1992.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    J. L. Mitchell, W. B. Pennebaker, C. E. Fogg, and D. J. LeGall, MPEG Video Compression Standard, Chapman and Hall, New York, 1997.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    B. G. Haskell, A. Puri, and A. N. Netravali, Digital Video: An Introduction to MPEG-2, Chapman and Hall, New York, 1997.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    A. Puri, and T. Chen, Multimedia Systems, Standards and Networks, Marcel Dekker, New York, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    ITU-T Recommendation H.261, Video Codec for Audiovisual Services at p*64 kbits/sec.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    ITU-T Recommendation H.263, Video Coding for Low Bit rate Communication.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    “Coding of Moving Pictures and Associated Audio for Digital Storage Media up to about 1.5Mbit/s,” ISO/IEC 11172-2: Video (November 1991).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    “Generic Coding of Moving Pictures and Associated Audio Information,” ISO/IEC 13818-2: Video (November 1994).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    “Coding of Audio-Visual Objects,” ISO/IEC 14496-2: Video (October 1998).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    A. Puri, R. Aravind, and B. G. Haskell, “Adaptive Frame/Field Motion Compensated Video Coding”, Signal Processing Image Communication, Vol. 1–5, pp. 39–58, Feb. 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Apple ComputerCupertinoUSA

Personalised recommendations