Models, Traffic Models, Simulation, and Traffic Simulation

Part of the International Series in Operations Research & Management Science book series (ISOR, volume 145)


This introductory chapter to a book on traffic simulation fundamentals is aimed at setting up a comprehensive framework for simulation as a well-established and grounded OR technique and its specificities when applied to traffic systems; the main approaches to traffic simulation and the principles of traffic simulation model building; the fundamentals of traffic flow theory and its application to traffic simulation from macroscopic, mesoscopic, or microscopic approaches. The chapter also provides a basic overview on the principles of dynamic traffic assignment and its application to traffic simulation and the calibration and validation of traffic simulation models, two key topics to establish the validity and credibility for traffic simulation models being used in the decision-making processes.


Traffic Flow Route Choice Traffic Simulation Simultaneous Perturbation Stochastic Approximation Dynamic Traffic Assignment 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Abou-Rahme N, White J (1999) Replicating Shockwaves within a classical car-following model. In: Transport Research Laboratory, Crowthorne, UK, Annual Research Review, pp. 73–82Google Scholar
  2. Ackoff RL (1962) Scientific Method: optimizing applied research decisions, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. Ahmed KI (1999) Modeling drivers’ acceleration and lane changing behaviors. PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyGoogle Scholar
  4. Ashok K, Ben-Akiva M (2000) Alternative approaches for real-time estimation and prediction of time-dependent origin-destination flows, Transportation Science, vol.34, (1), pp. 21–36Google Scholar
  5. Aycin MF, Benekohal RF (1998) Linear acceleration car―following model development and validation. Transportation research record no. 1644, pp 10–19Google Scholar
  6. Balakrishna R (2006) Off-line calibration of dynamic traffic assignment models. PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyGoogle Scholar
  7. Balakrishna B, Antoniou C, Ben-Akiva M, Koutsopoulos H, Wen Y (2007a) Calibration of microscopic traffic simulation models: methods and application, TRR no. 1999, pp 198–206Google Scholar
  8. Balakrishna R, Ben-Akiva M, Koutsopoulos HN (2007b) Off-line calibration of dynamic traffic assignment: simultaneous demand–supply estimation. Proceedings of the 86th annual meeting of the transportation research board, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  9. Barceló J, Casas J (2004) Methodological notes on the calibration and validation of microscopic traffic simulation models. Paper 04-4975 presented at the 83rd transportation research board annual meeting, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  10. Barceló J, Casas J (2006) Stochastic heuristic dynamic assignment based on AIMSUN microscopic traffic simulator. Paper #06-3107 presented at 85th transportation research board annual meeting, Transportation research records no. 1964, pp 70–79Google Scholar
  11. Barceló J, Perarnau J, Torday A (2007) Automated calibration assistance tools for microscopic traffic simulators. Presented at the world conference on transportation research, included in the CD conference proceedings, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  12. Bayarri MJ, Berger JO, Higdon D, Kennedy MC, Kottas A, Paulo R, Sacks J, Cafeo A, Cavendish JC, Lin CH, Tui J (2002) A framework for validation of computer models. NISS technical report number 128Google Scholar
  13. Bayarri MJ, Berger JO, Molina G, Rouphail NM, Sacks J (2004) Assessing uncertainties in traffic simulation: a key component in model calibration and validation. Paper #04-2504, 83rd TRB meeting, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  14. Ben-Akiva M, Bierlaire M (1999) Discrete Choice Methods and Their Applications to Short Term Travel Decisions, In: Hall RW (ed) Handbook of Transportation Science, Kluwer’s International Series, Kluwer Academic Publishers, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  15. Ben-Akiva M, Lerman SR (1985) Discrete choice analysis: theory and applications to travel demand. MIT Press, Cambridge, MassachussetsGoogle Scholar
  16. Ben-Akiva M, Bierlaire M, Bottom J, Koutsopoulos HN, Mishalani RG (1997) Development of a route guidance generation system for real-time application. Proceedings of the 8th IFAC symposium on transportation systems, Chania, CreteGoogle Scholar
  17. Ben-Akiva M, Bierlaire M, Burton D, Kotsopoulos HN, Mishalani R (2001) Network state estimation and prediction for real-time traffic management. Netw Spatial Econ 1:293–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ben-Akiva M, Bierlaire M, Koutsopoulos HN, Mishalani R (2002) Real-time simulation of traffic demand–supply interactions within DynaMIT. In: Gendreau M, Marcotte P (eds) Transportation and network analysis: current trends. Miscellanea in honour of Michael Florian. Kluwer, BostonGoogle Scholar
  19. Benekohal RF, Treiterer J (1988) CARSIM: car-following model for simulation of traffic in normal and stop-and-go conditions. Transportation research record No. 1194, pp 99–111Google Scholar
  20. Burghout W (2004) Hybrid microscopic–mesoscopic traffic simulation. Doctoral thesis, Royal Institute of technology, Stockholm, SwedenGoogle Scholar
  21. Burghout W, Kotsopoulos H, Andréasson I (2005) Hybrid mesoscopic–microscopic traffic simulation. Proceedings of the 83rd TRB annual meeting, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  22. Carey M, Ge YE (2007) Comparison of methods for path flow reassignment for dynamic user equilibrium. School of Management & Economics, Queen’s University, Belfast, Northern IrelandGoogle Scholar
  23. Cascetta E (2001) Transportation systems engineering: theory and methods. Kluwer, Academic Publishers. The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  24. Cascetta E, Inaudi D, Marquis G (1993) Dynamic estimators of origin–destination matrices using traffic counts. Transport Sci 27(4):363–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Cascetta E, Nuzzolo A, Russo F, Vitetta A (1996) A modified logit route choice model overcoming path overlapping problems. In: Proceedings of the 13th international symposium on transportation and traffic flow theory. Pergamon, Elsevier Science Ltd., Oxford, UKGoogle Scholar
  26. Chandler FE, Herman R, Montroll EW (1958) Traffic dynamics: studies in car following. Oper Res 6:165–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Chen S, Sheridan TB, Kusunoki H, Komoda N (1995) Car-following measurements, simulations, and a proposal procedure for evaluating safety. Analysis, design and evaluation of man–machine systems, vol. 2. Pergamon Press, pp. 529–534Google Scholar
  28. Choudhury C (2007) Modeling driving decisions with latent plans. PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyGoogle Scholar
  29. Choudhury C, Ben-Akiva M, Toledo T, Lee G, Rao A (2007) Modeling cooperative lane-changing and forced merging behavior. Proceedings of the 86th transportation research board annual meeting, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  30. Choudhury C, Ramanujam V, Ben-Akiva M (2008) A lane changing model for urban arterials. Proceedings of the 3rd international symposium of transport simulation, Gold Coast, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  31. Chronopoulos AT, Michalopoulos P, Donohoe J (1992) Efficient traffic flow simulation computations. Math Comput Model 16(5):107–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ciuffo B, Punzo V, Torrieri V (2007) A framework for calibrating microscopic traffic simulation models. Proceedings of the 86th TRB annual meeting, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  33. Daellenbach HG (1995) Systems and decision making: a management science approach. John Wiley & Sons Ltd., Chichester, EnglandGoogle Scholar
  34. Daganzo CF (1994) The cell-transmission model: a simple dynamic representation of highway traffic. Transport Res 288(4):269–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Daganzo CF (1997) Fundamentals of transportation and traffic operations. Pergamon, Elsevier Science Ltd., Oxford, UKGoogle Scholar
  36. Del Castillo JM (1994) A theory of car following. PhD Thesis, Universidad de Sevilla, SpainGoogle Scholar
  37. Del Castillo JM, Benitez FG (1995) On the functional form of the speed–density relationship I: general theory. Transport Res 29B(5):373–389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Dowling R, Skabardonis A, Halkias J, McHaie G, Zammit G (2004) Guidelines for calibration of microsimulation models: framework and application. In: Transportation research records: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1876, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  39. Edie LC (1960) Car following and steady theory for non-congested traffic flow. Oper Res 9:66–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Fellendorf M (1994) VISSIM: a microscopic simulation tool to evaluate actuated signal control including bus priority. Technical paper, Session 32, 64th ITE annual meeting, Dallas, TXGoogle Scholar
  41. FHWA (2004) Traffic analysis toolbox, volume II: guidelines for applying traffic microsimulation software, Publication FHWA-HRT-04-040, FHWA, US Department of Transportation,
  42. Florian M, Hearn D (1995) Network equilibrium models and algorithms. In: Ball MO et al. (eds) Handbooks in OR & MS, vol. 8. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  43. Florian M, Mahut M, Tremblay N (2001) A hybrid optimization–mesoscopic simulation dynamic traffic assignment model. Proceedings of the 2001 IEEE intelligent transport systems conference, Oakland, pp 118–123Google Scholar
  44. Florian M, Mahut M, Tremblay N (2002) Application of a simulation-based dynamic traffic assignment model. Presented at the international symposium on transport simulation, Yokohama (also in: Kitamura R, Kuwahara M (eds) Simulation approaches in transportation analysis. Kluwer, 2005, pp 1–21)Google Scholar
  45. Fox K (2008) Is Micro-Simulation a waste of Time? Proceedings of the European Transport Conference, Leeuwenhorst Conference Centre, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  46. Friesz TL, Bernstein D, Smith TE, Tobin RL, Wie BW (1993) A variational inequality formulation of the dynamic network user equilibrium problem. Oper Res 41(1):179–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Gazis DC, Herman R, Potts RB (1959) Car-following theory of steady state flow. Oper Res 7(4):499–505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Gazis DC, Herman R, Rothery RW (1961) Mon-linear follow-the-leader models of traffic flow, Oper. Res. 9 (4), pp. 545–567Google Scholar
  49. Gerlough DL, Huber MJ (1975) Traffic flow theory: a monograph. TRB special report 165Google Scholar
  50. Gipps PG (1981) A behavioral car-following model for computer simulation. Transport Res B 15:105–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Greenberg H (1959) An analysis of traffic flow. Oper Res 7(1):79–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Greenshields BD (1934) A study of traffic capacity. HRB Proc 14:448–477Google Scholar
  53. Herman R, Rothery RW (1965) Car following and steady state flow. In: Almond J (ed) Proceedings of the 2nd international symposium on the theory of traffic flow. OECD, ParisGoogle Scholar
  54. Herman R, Montroll EW, Potts RB, Rothery RW (1959) Traffic dynamics: analysis of stability in car following. Oper Res 7(1):86–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Hidas P (1998) A car following model for urban traffic simulation. Traffic Eng Control 39(5):300–305Google Scholar
  56. Hidas P (2002) Modelling lane changing and merging in microscopic traffic simulation. Transport Res C Emerg Technol 10(5–6):351–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Hidas P (2004) Evaluation of lane changing and merging in microsimulation models. Papers of the 27th Australasian transport research forum, AdelaideGoogle Scholar
  58. Highway Agency (1996) Design manual for roads and bridges, vol. 12, Traffic appraisal of road schemes,  http://Section 2.5, Part I, Traffic appraisal in urban areas. The Stationery Office, London
  59. Hirsch C (1988) Numerical Computation of Internal and External Flows, vol. 1, Wiley Series in Numerical Method in Engineering, John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, EnglandGoogle Scholar
  60. Hollander Y, Ronghui L (2008) The principles of calibrating traffic microsimulation models. Transportation 35:347–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Hourdakis J, Michalopoulos PG, Kottommannil J (2003) A practical procedure for calibrating microscopic traffic simulation models. Presented at the 82nd TRB annual meeting, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  62. Janson BN (1991) Dynamic assignment for urban road networks. Transport Res B 25(2/3):143–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Jayakrisham R, Mahmassani HS, Yu TY (1994) An evaluation tool for advanced traffic information and management systems in urban networks. Transport Res C 2C(3):129–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Kim K, Rilett LR (2004) A genetic algorithm based approach to traffic micro-simulation calibration using ITS data. 83rd TRB annual meeting, Washington D.C.Google Scholar
  65. Kühne R (1989) Microscopic distance strategies and macroscopic traffic flow models. In: CCCT’89, Control, computers, communication in transportation. AFCET, Paris, pp 267–273Google Scholar
  66. Kühne R, Michalopoulos P, Zhang HM (1992) Continuum flow models,  Chapter 5 in Traffic flow theory,
  67. Law AM, Kelton WD (1991) Simulation modeling and analysis. McGraw-Hill, International Editions, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  68. Leonard DP, Gower P, Taylor N (1989) CONTRAM. Structure of the model. Transport and Road Research Laboratory, Research report 178, Department of Transport, CrowthorneGoogle Scholar
  69. Leutzbach W (1988) Introduction to the theory of traffic flow. Springer-Verlag, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  70. Liu R, Hyman G (2008) Generic guidance for modeling merges. Proceedings of the European transport conference, Leeuwenhorst Conference Centre, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  71. Liu HX, Ma W, Ban JX, Mirchandani P (2005) Dynamic equilibrium assignment with microscopic traffic simulation. Paper presented at the 8th international IEEE conference on intelligent transportation systems, WienGoogle Scholar
  72. Lo HK, Szeto WY (2002) A cell-based variational inequality formulation of the dynamic user optimal assignment problem. Transport Res B 36:421–443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Lubashevsky I, Wagner P, Mahnke R (2003) Rational-driver approximation in car-following theory. Phys Rev E 68, pp. 1–15Google Scholar
  74. Ma T, Abdulhai B (2002) A genetic algorithm-based optimization approach and generic tool for calibrating traffic microscopic simulation parameters. Transportation research record 1806, pp 6–15Google Scholar
  75. Ma J, Dong H, Zhang M (2006) Calibration of departure time and route choice parameters in micro-simulation with macro measurements and genetic algorithm. 85th TRB annual meeting, paper no. 2376, Washington D.C.Google Scholar
  76. Ma J, Dong H, Zhang M (2007) Calibration of microsimulation with heuristic optimization methods. TRR no. 1999, pp 208–217Google Scholar
  77. Mahmassani H (2001) Dynamic network traffic assignment and simulation methodology for advanced system management applications. Netw Spatial Econ 1:267–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Mahmassani HS, Hu TY, Peeta S, Ziliaskopoulos A (1994) Development and testing of dynamic traffic assignment and simulation procedures for ATIS/ATMS applications. Technical report DTFH61-90-R00074-FG, Center for Transportation Research, The University of Texas at AustinGoogle Scholar
  79. Mahut M (1999) Behavioural car following models. Report CRT-99-31, Centre for Research on Transportation, University of Montreal, Montreal, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  80. Mahut M (2000) Discrete flow model for dynamic network loading. PhD thesis, Département d’Informatique et de Recherhe Opérationelle, Université de Montréal. Published by the Center for Research on Transportation (CRT), University of MontrealGoogle Scholar
  81. Mahut M, Florian M, Tremblay N (2003a) Space–time queues and dynamic traffic assignment: a model, algorithm and applications. Transportation Research Board, 82nd annual meeting, Washington D.C.Google Scholar
  82. Mahut M, Florian M, Tremblay N (2003b) Traffic simulation and dynamic assignment for off-line applications. Presented at the 10th world congress on intelligent transportation systems, MadridGoogle Scholar
  83. Mahut M, Florian M, Tremblay N (2004) INRO Consultants Inc., Montréal, QC and M. Campbell, D. Patman and Z. Krnic McDaniel, City of Calgary, Calgary, AB. Calibration and application of a simulation based dynamic traffic assignment model, Transportation research record 1876, pp 101–111. Available at
  84. Mahut M, Florian M, Tremblay N (2008) Comparison of assignment methods for simulation-based dynamic-equilibrium traffic assignment. Presented at the 88th annual meeting of the transportation research board, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  85. May A (1990) Traffic flow fundamentals. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  86. May AD, Keller HEM (1967) Non-integer car-Following Models, Highw. Res. Rec. 199, pp. 19–32Google Scholar
  87. Messmer A, Papageorgiou M (1990) METANET: a macroscopic simulation program for motorway networks. Traffic Eng Control 31:466–470Google Scholar
  88. Michalopoulos PG (1988) Analysis of traffic flows at complex congested arterials. Transport Res Rec 1194:77–86Google Scholar
  89. Michalopoulos PG, Yi P, Beskos DE, Lyrintzis AS (1991) Continuum modeling of traffic dynamics. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Application of Advanced Technology in Transportation Engineering, August 18–21, Minneapolis, Minnesota, pp 36–40Google Scholar
  90. Mitchell G (1993) The practice of operations research. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, EnglandGoogle Scholar
  91. Newell GF(2002) A simplified car-following theory: a lower order model. Transport Res B 36:195–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. NGSIM (2002) Next generation simulation program. Federal Highway Administration (FHWA),
  93. OECD 1987) Dynamic traffic management in urban and suburban road systems. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, ParisGoogle Scholar
  94. Panwai S, Dia H (2005) Comparative evaluation of microscopic car-following behavior. IEEE Trans Intell Transport Syst 6(4):314–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Papageorgiou M (1990) Dynamic modeling, assignment, and route guidance in traffic networks. Transport Res B 24B(6):471–495CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Papageorgiou M, Schmidt G (1991) Freeway traffic modeling. In: Papageorgiou M (ed) Concise encyclopaedia of traffic and transportation systems. Pergamon Press, Elsevier Science Ltd., Oxford, UKGoogle Scholar
  97. Papageorgiou M, Blosseville JM, Haj-Salem H (1989) Macroscopic modeling of traffic flow on the Boulevard Periphérique in Paris. Transport Res 23B:29–47Google Scholar
  98. Papageorgiou M, Blosseville JM, Haj-Salem H (1990a) Modeling and real-time control of traffic flow on the southern part of Boulevard Périphérique in Paris, Part I. Model Transport Res 24A:345–359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Papageorgiou M, Blosseville JM, Haj-Salem H (1990b) Modeling and real-time control of traffic flow on the southern part of Boulevard Périphérique in Paris, Part II: Coordinated on-ramp metering. Transport Res 24A:361–370Google Scholar
  100. Parker MT (1996) The effect of heavy goods vehicles and follower behavior on capacity at motorway roadwork sites. Traffic Eng Control 37(9):524–531Google Scholar
  101. Payne HJ (1971) Models of freeway traffic and control. Simul Council Proc 1:51–61Google Scholar
  102. Payne HJ (1979) FREEFLO: a macroscopic simulation model of freeway traffic. Transport Res Rec 772:68–75Google Scholar
  103. Peeta S, Mahmassani, HS (1995) System optimal and user equilibrium time-dependent traffic assignment in congested networks. Ann Oper Res 60:81–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Pipes LA (1953) An operational analysis of traffic dynamics. J Appl Phys 24(3):274–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Punzo V, Tripodi A (2007) Steady-state solutions and multiclass calibration of Gipps microscopic traffic flow model. TRR no. 1999, pp 104–114Google Scholar
  106. Rakha H, Gao Y (2009) Calibration of steady-state car-following models using macroscopic loop detector data. Paper presented at the 88th TRB annual meeting, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  107. Rakha H, Pecker CC, Cybis HBB (2007) Calibration procedure for Gipps car-following model. TRR no. 1999, pp 115–127Google Scholar
  108. Ran B, Boyce D (1996) Modeling dynamic transportation networks. Springer, Lecture Notes on Transportation, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  109. Ranney TA (1999) Physiological factors that influence car-following and car-following model development. Transport Res F Traffic Psychol Behav 2:213–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Reuschel A (1950a) Vehicle movements in a platoon, Osterreichisches Ing.-Arch 4:193–215Google Scholar
  111. Reuschel A (1950b) Vehicle movements in a platoon with uniform acceleration or deceleration of the lead vehicle. Zeitschrift des Osterreichischen Ingenieur und Architekten Vereines (95):59–62, 73–77Google Scholar
  112. Ross P (1988) Traffic dynamics. Transport Res B 22B(6):421–435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Rothery RW (1992) Car following models,  Chapter 4, in Traffic flow theory,
  114. Rouphail NM, Sacks J (2003) Thoughts on traffic models calibration and validation. Paper presented at the workshop on traffic modeling, Sitges, SpainGoogle Scholar
  115. Sadegh P (1997) Constrained optimization via stochastic approximation with a simultaneous perturbation gradient approximation. Automatica 33:889–892CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. Sbayti H, Lu C, Mahmassani HS (2007) Efficient implementations of the method of successive averages in simulation-based DTA models for large-scale network applications. TRB 2007 annual meeting. Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  117. Sheffi Y (1985) Urban transportation networks: equilibrium analysis with mathematical programming networks. Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  118. Spall JC (1998) An overview of the simultaneous perturbation method for efficient optimization. John Hopkins APL Tech Digest 19(4):482–492Google Scholar
  119. Spall JC (2003) Introduction to stochastic search and optimization: estimation, simulation and control. Wiley-Interscience, John Wiley & Sons Inc., New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  120. Stewart D (2003) Calibrating the freeway merge in Aimsun2 for the pacific motorway project, Queensland Main Roads, Traffic and Road Use Management DivisionGoogle Scholar
  121. Theil H (1961) Economic forecasts and policy. North-Holland, Publishing Company, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  122. Toledo T, Koutsopoulos H (2004) Statistical validation of traffic simulation models. Proceedings of the 82nd annual meeting of the transportation research board, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  123. Tong CO, Wong SC (2000) A predictive dynamic traffic assignment model in congested capacity-constrained road networks. Transport Res B 34:625–644CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  124. Varia HR, Dhingra SL (2004) Dynamic user equilibrium traffic assignment on congested multidestination network. J Transport Eng 130(2):211–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  125. Wagner P, Lubashevsky I (2006) Empirical basis for car-following theory development. Research Report Institute of Transport Research, German Aerospace Center, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  126. Wang J, Ronghui L, Montgomery F (2005) Paper presented at the 84th annual meeting of the transportation research board, Washington, BCGoogle Scholar
  127. Wardrop JG (1952) Some theoretical aspects of road traffic research. Proceedings of the Institute of Civil Engineers, Part II, pp 325–378Google Scholar
  128. Wiedemann R (1974) Simulation des Verkehrsflusses. Schriftenreihe des Instituts für Verkehrwessen, Heft 8, Universität (TH) KarlsruheGoogle Scholar
  129. Wilson RE (2001) An analysis of Gipps’ car-following model of highway traffic. IMA J Appl Math 66:509–537CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  130. Wu JH (1991) A study of monotone variational inequalities and their application to network equilibrium problems. Ph.D. thesis, Centre de Recherche sur les Transports, Université de Montréal, Publication #801Google Scholar
  131. Wu JH, Chen Y, Florian M (1998a) The continuous dynamic network loading problem: a mathematical formulation and solution method. Transport Res B 32(3):173–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  132. Wu JH, Florian M, Xu YW, Rubio-Ardanaz JM (1998b) A projection algorithm for the dynamic network equilibrium problem. In: Yang Z, Wang KCP, Mao B (eds) Traffic and transportation studies, Proceedings of the ICTTS’98. ASCE, pp 379–390Google Scholar
  133. Xu YW, Wu JH, Florian M (1998) An Efficient Algorithm for the Continuous Network Loading Problem: a DYNALOAD Implementation. In: Bell MGH (ed) Transportation Networks: Recent Methodological Advances, Pergamon Press, Elsevier Science Ltd. Oxford, UKGoogle Scholar
  134. Xu YW, Wu JH, Florian M, Marcotte P, Zhu DL (1999) Advances in the continuous dynamic network problem. Transport Sci 33(4):341–353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  135. Yeo H, Skabardonis A (2007) NGSIM TO9: oversaturated freeway flow algorithm,
  136. Yoshii T (1999) Standard verification process for traffic simulation model – verification manual. Kochi University of Technology, Kochi, JapanGoogle Scholar
  137. Zhang M, Ma J (2008) Developing calibration tools for microscopic traffic simulation final report, Parts 1, 2 and 3, California PATH working papers UCB-ITS-PWP-2008-3Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Statistics and Operations Research and Center for Innovation in TransportUniversitat Politècnica de CatalunyaBarcelonaSpain

Personalised recommendations