The Greater Mekong Sub-region of Southeast Asia: Improving Logistics Connectivity

Chapter

Abstract

Traders in the Greater Mekong Sub-region (GMS) require efficient logistics services that can move their goods to the proper place, at the promised time, in the right condition, and at a suitable price. The GMS in Southeast Asia is composed of Cambodia, Lao People’s Democratic Republic, Myanmar, Thailand, Vietnam, as well as Yunnan Province and the Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region of the People’s Republic of China. It is, therefore, of great importance that regional linkages among neighbouring countries be enhanced, in order to facilitate trade and develop logistics for better access to the “global” market. The purpose of this chapter is to provide a description and rating of the GMS logistics system. The Greater Mekong Sub-region has focused on an “economic corridor” approach to economic integration; assessment of the logistics performance of these corridors is thus needed. Even though there is a GMS agreement that was ratified to facilitate the crossing of borders, it was still observed during our study that the weakest links in the various economic corridors remain the border crossings.

References

  1. ADB (2010) Connecting Greater Mekong Sub-region railways: a strategic framework. Asian Development Bank, ManilaGoogle Scholar
  2. Banomyong R (2008) Logistics development in the Greater Mekong Sub-region: a study of the north-south economic corridor. J Greater Mekong Sub-region Dev Studies 4:43–58Google Scholar
  3. Banomyong R (2010) Benchmarking economic corridors logistics performance: a GMS border crossing observation. World Customs J 4(1):37–46Google Scholar
  4. Banomyong R, Cook P, Kent P (2008) Formulating regional logistics development policy: the case of ASEAN. Int J Logistics Res and Appl 11(5):359–379Google Scholar
  5. Banomyong R, Faust P (2010) GMS logistics development strategy. Asian development bank, RETA 6450 Enhancing transport and trade facilitation. Unpublished report, ManilaGoogle Scholar
  6. Banomyong R, Sopadang A, Ramingwong S (2010) Logistics benchmark study of the East West economic corridor. Bus Manage Q Rev 1(2):1–12Google Scholar
  7. Beresford, AKC (1999), Modelling freight transport costs: a case study of the UK-Greece corridors. Int J Logistics Res Appl 2(3):229–246Google Scholar
  8. Beresford AKC, Dubey RC (1990) Handbook on the management and operations of dry ports. RDP/LDC/7, United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  9. Chen F, Lee C-Y (2013) Logistics in China. In: Bookbinder JH (ed) Global logistics. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  10. ESCAP (2005), Free trade zone and port hinterland development. Economic and social commission for Asia and the Pacific, United Nations, New York, ST/ESCAP/2377Google Scholar
  11. Fujimura M (2008) Economic integration in the Greater Mekong Sub-region and cross border transport infrastructure. J Greater Mekong Sub-region Dev Studies 4:21–42Google Scholar
  12. Grant DB, Lambert DM, Stock JR, Ellram LM (2006) Fundamentals of logistics management. McGraw Hill, European EditionGoogle Scholar
  13. Higginson JK (2013) Border issues and research. In: Bookbinder JH (ed) Global logistics. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  14. Jinxin L (2007) Handbook of the logistics study tour of China-Myanmar-Thailand-Laos highway, Mar 5–11, 2007. Foreign affairs office of the people’s government of Yunnan Province, ChinaGoogle Scholar
  15. Kieck E (2010) Coordinated border management: unlocking trade opportunities through one stop border post. World Customs J 4(1):3–14Google Scholar
  16. Than M (2005) Myanmar’s cross-border economic relation with the People’s Republic of China and Thailand in the Greater Mekong Sub-region. J GMS Dev Studies 2(1):37–54Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Thammasat Business SchoolBangkokThailand

Personalised recommendations