Historical Introduction

  • Hendrikus Duifhuis


After brief examples from Early Greek studies and from the Renaissance of auditory research, developments during the nineteenth and the first half of the twentieth centuries are addressed. This period covers the transition from careful description to formal analysis, and provides the foundation of modern cochlear mechanics, linking medical data to (bio)physical and mathematical concepts.


Hair Cell Temporal Bone Auditory Nerve Eustachian Tube Basilar Membrane 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Allen JB (1996) Harvey Fletcher’s role in the creation of communication acoustics. J Acoust Soc Am 99:1825–1839PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. ANSI S1 (2005) Acoustical Terminology. American National Standards Institute, Inc., including 2005 updatesGoogle Scholar
  3. Aristotle ( ∼ 350 BCE) Sense Perception (DA II.5), in: Greek: Περι Ψυχ\tilde{η}ζ, or Latin: De Anima. English transl. by J. A. Smith, publ. Oxford, 1928. Ebook: e.g., MIT the Internet Classics ArchiveGoogle Scholar
  4. von Békésy G (1960) Experiments in Hearing. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  5. von Békésy G, Rosenblith WA (1948) The early history of hearing—Observations and theories. J Acoust Soc Am 20:727–748CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Beyer RT (1999) Sounds of our times: two hundred years of acoustics. Springer-Verlag, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. de Boer E (1956) On the ‘residue’ in hearing. PhD thesis, Univ. of Amsterdam, NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  8. Buytendijk FJJ (1911) On the negative variation of the nervus acousticus caused by a sound. Proceedings KNAW 13(II):649–652Google Scholar
  9. Derbyshire AJ, Davis H (1935) The action potential of the auditory nerve. Unknown Journal 113:476–504Google Scholar
  10. Finger S (1994) Origins of Neuroscience. Oxford University Press, Oxford, ch.8 The Ear and Theories of Hearing. 9 Audition and the Central Nervous SystemGoogle Scholar
  11. Forbes A, Miller RH, O’Connor J (1927) Electric responces to acoustic stimuli in the decerebrate animal. Amer J Physiol 80:363–380Google Scholar
  12. Fourier JBJ (1822) Théorie Analytique de la Chaleur. Firmin Didot, ParisGoogle Scholar
  13. Galambos R, Davis H (1943) The response of single auditory-nerve fibers to acoustic stimulation. J Neurophysiol 6:39–57Google Scholar
  14. Galambos R, Davis H (1944) Inhibition of activity in single auditory nerve fibers by acoustic stimulation. J Neurophysiol 7:287–303Google Scholar
  15. Gitter AH (1990a) Eine kurze Geschichte der Hörforschung - Teil 1: Antike. Laryngorhinootologie 69:442–445PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gitter AH (1990b) Eine kurze Geschichte der Hörforschung - Teil 2: Renaissance. Laryngorhinootologie 69:495–500PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hallpike CS, Rawdon-Smith AF (1934) The “Wever and Bray Phenomenon.” A study of the electrical response in the cochlea with especial reference to its origin. J Physiol 81:395–408Google Scholar
  18. Hawkins JE (2004b) Sketches of otohistory. Part 1: Otiprehisotry: How It All Began. Audiol Neurootol 9:66–71PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hawkins JE (2004a) Sketches of otohistory. Part 3: Alfonso Corti. Audiol Neurootol 9:259–264PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hawkins JE, Schacht J (2008) Sketches of Otohistory. Karger, BaselGoogle Scholar
  21. Held H, Kleinknecht F (1927) Die lokale Entspannung der Basilarmembran und ihre Hörücken. Pflüg Arch ges Physiol 216:1–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. von Helmholtz HLF (1863) Die Lehre von den Tonempfindungen, 1st edn. Vieweg und Sohn, Braunschweig, english edition: On the Sensations of Tone, transl. by A.J. Ellis (1885) of 4th German edition (1877), publ. by Dover in 1954Google Scholar
  23. Hunt FV (1978) Origins in Acoustics. Yale University, 2nd edition: 1992 by the Acoustical Society of AmericaGoogle Scholar
  24. Lindsay RB (ed) (1972) Acoustics: Historical and Philosophical Development. Benchmark Papers on Acoustics, Dowden, Hutchinson and Ross, Stroudsburg, PAGoogle Scholar
  25. Lustig LR, Niparko JK, Minor LB, Zee DS (2003) Clinical neurotology: diagnosing and managing disorders of hearing, balance and the facial nerve. Martin Dunitz Ltd, London, (collection of review papers)Google Scholar
  26. Ohm GS (1843) Ueber die Definition des Tones, nebst daran geknüpfter Theorie der Sirene und ähnlicher tonbildender Vorrichtungen. Poggendorff’s Annal Phys Chem 59:513–565CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Politzer A (1907) Geschichte der Ohrenheilkunde. I. Band. F. Enke, StuttgartGoogle Scholar
  28. Politzer A (1913) Geschichte der Ohrenheilkunde. II. Band. F. Enke, StuttgartGoogle Scholar
  29. Rayleigh JWS (1896) Facts and Theories of Audition, vol II, 2nd edn, MACMILLAN, London, chap XXIII. [Dover edition: 1945]Google Scholar
  30. Schacht J, Hawkins JE (2006) Sketches of otohistory. Part 11: Ototoxicity: drug-induces hearing loss. Audiol Neurotol 11:1–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Schouten JF (1938) The perception of subjective tones. Proc Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen 41:1086–1093Google Scholar
  32. Schouten JF (1940) The residue, a new concept in subjective sound analysis. Proc Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen 43:356–365Google Scholar
  33. Schouten JF, Ritsma RJ, Cardozo BL (1962) Pitch of the residue. J Acoust Soc Am 34:1418–1424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Seebeck A (1841) Beobachtungen über einige Bedingungen der Entstehung von Tönen. Ann Phys Chem 53:417–436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Stevens SS, Volkmann J, Newman ER (1937) A scale for the measurement of the psychological magnitude pitch. J Acoust Soc Am pp 185–190Google Scholar
  36. Stevens SS (ed) (1951) Handbook of Experimental Psychology. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  37. Stevens SS, Davis H (1936) Psychophysiological acoustics: Pitch and loudness. J Acoust Soc Am 8:1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Trendelenburg F (1935) Klänge und Geräusche. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  39. Wegel RL, Lane CE (1924) The auditory masking of one pure tone by another and its probable relation to the dynamics of the inner ear. Phys Rev 23:266–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Wever EG (1949) Theory of Hearing. Wiley, [Dover edition: 1970, isbn: 486623998]Google Scholar
  41. Wever EG, Bray CW (1930a) Action currents in the auditory nerve in response to acoustical stimulation. P N A S 16:344–350PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Wever EG, Bray CW (1930b) Auditory nerve impulses. Science 71(1834):215, [Feb. 21]Google Scholar
  43. Wever EG, Bray CW (1930c) Present possibilities for auditory theory. Psych Rev 37:365–380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Wever EG, Bray CW (1938) Distortion in the ear as shown by the electrical responses in the cochlea. J Acoust Soc Am 9:227–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Wever EG, Bray CW, Lawrence M (1940a) The origin of combination tones. J Exp Psychol 27(3):217–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Wever EG, Bray CW, Lawrence M (1940b) A quantitative study of combination tones. J Exp Psychol 27(5):469–496CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Wever EG, Lawrence M, von Békésy G (1954) A note on recent developments in auditory theory. P N A S 40:508–512PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Mathematics and Natural SciencesUniversity of GroningenGroningenThe Netherlands
  2. 2.BCN-NeuroImaging CenterGroningenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations