Stakeholder Theory and Applications in Information Systems

Part of the Integrated Series in Information Systems book series (ISIS, volume 28)


Stakeholder theory is widely used in management in examining ­organizational environment, strategic management, ethical issues, business planning process, e-government, project management, environment management, etc. Recently stakeholders are also seen as a means to more successful information and communication technologies and information system development and implementation issues. In this chapter, stakeholder theory, its origin and applications in Information Systems field in literature are discussed.


Stakeholder theory Stakeholder model Stakeholder Information systems 



Advanced information technology


Case-based reasoning


Information centers


Information systems


Information technology


Net-enhanced organization


Stakeholder management strategy support system


Strategic information systems planning


  1. Ackoff, R. L. (1974). Redesigning the future. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  2. Ahn, J.-H., & Skudlark, A. E. (1997). Resolving conflict of interests in the process of an information system implementation for advanced telecommunication services. Journal of Information Technology, 12, 3–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bailur, S. (2007). Using stakeholder theory to analyze telecenter projects. Information Technologies and International Development, 3(3), 61–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Benjamin, R. I., & Levinson, E. (1995). A framework for managing IT-enabled change. Sloan Management Review, 34, 23–33. Summer.Google Scholar
  5. Bento, R. F. (1996). Life in the middle: An analysis of information centers from the perspective of their major stakeholders. Information Management, 30, 101–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Boddy, D., & Buchanan, D. A. (1986). Managing new technology. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  7. Boonstra, A. (2006). Interpreting an ERP implementation from a stakeholder perspective. International Journal of Project Management, 24(1), 38–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brancheau, J. C., Janz, B. D., & Wetherbe, J. C. (1996). Key issues in information systems management: 1994–95 SIM Delphi results. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 20(2), 225–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Checkland, P. (1981). Systems thinking, systems practice. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  10. Checkland, P., & Scholes, J. (1990). Soft systems methodology in action. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  11. Cheng, Y., & Wang, W. (2009). Study of independent director system in corporate governance. Asian Social Science, 5(7), 65–69.Google Scholar
  12. Chua, C. E. H., Straub, D. W., Khoo, H. M., Kadiyala, S., & Kuechler, D. (2005). The evolution of E-commerce research: A stakeholder perspective. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 6(4), 262–279.Google Scholar
  13. Chung, W., Chen, H., & Reid, E. (2009). Business stakeholder analyzer: An experiment of classifying stakeholders on the web. Journal of the American Society for Information science and Technology, 60(1), 59–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Clarkson, M. (1995). A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 92–117.Google Scholar
  15. Dimovski, V., & Škerlavaj, M. (2004). A stakeholder theory approach to the organisational performance and influence of information-communication technology: Model concep­tualisation and testing, Economic and Business Review, 6(3), 245–265.Google Scholar
  16. Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the modern corporation: Concepts, evidence and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20, 65–91.Google Scholar
  17. Earl, M. J. (1989). Management strategies for information technology. London: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  18. Eden, C., & Ackermann, F. (1996). “Horses for courses” – A stakeholder view of the evaluation of GDSS’s. Journal of Group Decision and Negotiation, 5, 501–519.Google Scholar
  19. Eden, C., & van der Heijden, K. (1993). The relationship between stakeholder analysis and ­scenario planning. Paper presented in the strategy seminar, at the London School of Economics. Strathclyde Business School, Glasgow.Google Scholar
  20. Fassin, Y. (2008). Imperfections and shortcomings of the stakeholder model’s graphical representation. Journal of Business Ethics, 80(4), 879–888.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Flak, L. S., & Rose, J. (2005). Stakeholder governance: Adapting stakeholder theory to e-government. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 16(31), 1–46.Google Scholar
  22. Flood, R. L., & Jackson, M. C. (1991). Creative problem solving: Total systems intervention. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  23. Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman.Google Scholar
  24. Friedman, A., & Miles, S. (2006). Stakeholders: Theory and practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Friend, J., & Hickling, A. (1987). Planning under pressure: The strategic choice approach. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  26. Frooman, J. (1999). Stakeholder influence strategies. Academy of Management Review, 24(2), 191–205.Google Scholar
  27. Galliers, B. (1994). Information and IT strategy. In J. Keen (Ed.), Information management in health services (pp. 147–170). Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Galliers, R. D., & Baker, B. S. H. (Eds.). (1994). Strategic information management: Challenges and strategies in managing information systems. Oxford: Butterworth Heinemann.Google Scholar
  29. Garriga, E., & Melé, D. (2004). Corporate social responsibility theories: Mapping the territory. Journal of Business Ethics, 53(1/2), 51–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gibson, K. (2000). The moral basis of stakeholder theory. Journal of Business Ethics, 26(3), 245–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Gilbert, D. R., Hartman, E., Mauriel, J. J., & Freeman, R. E. (1988). A logic for strategy. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger Publishing Co.Google Scholar
  32. Hill, C. W. L., & Jones, T. M. (1992). Stakeholder-agency theory. Journal of Management Studies, 29(2), 131–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Introna, L., & Pouloudi, A. (1998). Privacy in the information age: Stakeholders, interests and values. In J. Van den Hoven, S. Rogerson, T. W. Bynum, & D. Gotterbarn (Eds.), ETHICOMP98 – The fourth international conference on ethical issues of information technology (pp. 340–352). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Erasmus University.Google Scholar
  34. Islam, S., & Grönlund, A. (2007). Agriculture market information e-service in Bangladesh: A stakeholder-oriented case analysis. In M. Wimmer, H. J. Scholl, & A. Grönlund (Eds.), EGOV 07. Proceedings of the 6th international conference EGOV 07, Springer Lecture Notes in Computer Science #4656, Regensburg, Germany, September 3–6, 2007.Google Scholar
  35. Knights, D., Noble, F., & Willmott, H. (1997). ‘We should be total slaves to the business’: Aligning information technology and strategy – issues and evidence. In B. P. Bloomfield, R. Coombs, D. Knights, & D. Littler (Eds.), Information technology and organizations: strategies, networks, and integration (pp. 13–35). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Lacity, M. C., & Hirschheim, R. (1995). Benchmarking as a strategy for managing conflicting stakeholder perceptions of information systems. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 4(2), 165–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lederer, A. L., & Mendelow, A. L. (1990). The impact of the environment on the management of information systems. Information Systems Research, 1(2), 205–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lee, G., & Gough, T. (1993). An integrated framework for information systems planning and its initial application. Journal of Information Technology, 8, 227–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Leidner, D., Pan, G., & Pan, S. L. (2009). The role of IT in crisis response: Lessons from SARS and Asian tsunami disasters. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 18(2), 80–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lim, G., Ahn, H., & Lee, H. (2005). Formulating strategies for stakeholder management: A case-based reasoning approach. Expert System Applications, 28(4), 831–840. DOI  = Scholar
  41. Lyytinen, K. (1988). Stakeholders, IS failures and soft systems methodology: An assessment. Journal of Applied Systems Analysis, 15, 61–81.Google Scholar
  42. Lyytinen, K., & Hirschheim, R. (1987). Information systems failures – A survey and classification of the empirical literature. In Oxford surveys in information technology (pp. 257–309). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Mumford, E., & Weir, M. (1979). Computer systems in work design, the ETHICS method: Effective technical and human implementation of computer systems: a work design exercise book for individuals and groups. London: Associated Business Press.Google Scholar
  44. Pouloudi, A. (1997). Conflicting concerns over the privacy of electronic medical records in the NHSnet. Business Ethics: A European Review, 6(2), 94–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Pouloudi, A. (1999). Aspects of the stakeholder concept and their implications for informations systems development. Paper presented at the 32nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 5–8 January, Maui, Hawaii.Google Scholar
  46. Pouloudi, A., & Whitley, E. A. (1997). Stakeholder identification in interorganizational systems: Gaining insights for drug use management systems. European Journal of Information Systems, 6(1), 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Rackley, L., Betts, J., & Webb, J. (1996). Conflicts of loyalty – The client versus the user and the stakeholder. In P. Barroso, T. W. Bynum, S. Rogerson, & L. Joyanes (Eds), ETHICOMP96 – III international conference: values and social responsibilities of the computer science (pp. 351–363), Pontificial University of Salamanca, Madrid, Spain.Google Scholar
  48. Rowley, J. (2010). e-Government stakeholders – Who are they and what do they want? International Journal of Information Management, 31(1), 53–62.Google Scholar
  49. Ruohonen, M. (1991). Stakeholders of strategic information systems planning: Theoretical ­concepts and empirical examples. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 1(1), 15–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Scott, M., Golden, W., & Hughes, M. (2004). Implementation strategies for e-government: A stakeholder analysis approach.Google Scholar
  51. Smith, H. J., & Hasnas, J. (1999). Ethics and information systems: The corporate domain. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 23(1), 109–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Valor, C. (2005). Corporate social responsibility and corporate citizenship: Towards corporate accountability. Business and Society Review, 110(2), 191–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Vidgen, R. (1997). Stakeholders, soft systems and technology: Separation and mediation in the analysis of information system requirements. Information Systems Journal, 7(1), 21–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Wagner, I. (1993). A web of fuzzy problems: Confronting the ethical issues. Communications of the ACM, 36(4), 94–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Willcocks, L., & Mason, D. (1987). Computerising work: People, systems design and workplace relations. London: Paradigm.Google Scholar
  56. Willetts, D. (1997). The poverty of stakeholding. In G. Kelly, D. Kelly, & A. Gamble (Eds.), Stakeholder capitalism (pp. 20–28). Basingstoke: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  57. Wolfe, R. A., & Putler, D. S. (2002). How tight are the ties that bind stakeholder groups? Organizational Science, 13(1), 64–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Yuthas, K., & Dillard, J. F. (1999). Ethical development of advanced technology: A postmodern stakeholder perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 19(1), 35–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Zhang, J., Dawes, S. S., & Sarkis, J. (2005). Exploring stakeholders’ expectations of the benefits and barriers of e-government knowledge sharing. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 18(5/6), 548–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Computer EngineeringAtilim UniversityAnkaraTurkey

Personalised recommendations