IT and Porter’s Competitive Forces Model and Strategies

  • Sanjay Mohapatra
Part of the Integrated Series in Information Systems book series (ISIS, volume 28)


Information Technology (IT) has revolutionized our economy and no organization can escape its impact. Using IT, new business models are being developed which could not be thought of earlier. As IT makes inroads into every aspect of organization, it is clear that strategies can be successful and have the competitive edge if they are integrated with IT. This is primarily because there have been reduction of operative cost and increase in productivity through technology adoption. As a result, IT cannot remain exclusive territory of IT/Electronic Data Processing/Computer department. Business managers now see the need to get directly involved in IT investment decisions and integration of IT with business processes and managing technological trends. Michael Porter’s theory of five forces, which defines the framework for formulating strategies through five forces, has to be integrated with technological capabilities of a firm to maintain competitive advantage. To make these integrations happen, managers need to understand IT in a holistic manner which will integrate business with IT. This chapter addresses the role of technology on the organizations’ strategies, how these five forces that Porter described are impacted by technology and how managers should plan to cope with the changing times with technology.


Porter’s five forces IT and porter’s five forces IT and Porter 



Common rail Diesel injection


Corporate social responsibility


Enterprise resource planning


Financial institution


Information technology


Knowledge management


Multi-point fuel injection


Software as service


Strength, weakness, opportunity, and threat


  1. Ackermann, J., Yeung, M. A., van Bommel, E. (2007). Better IT management for banks. The McKinsey Quarterly – Extracts from the original article IT operations of bank in Asia, Europe and Latin America, by authors.Google Scholar
  2. Bansal, S. (2009). Technology scorecards. New Jersey: Wiley.Google Scholar
  3. Beckinsale, M., Levy, M., & Powell, P. (2006). Exploring internet adoption drivers in SMEs. Electronic Markets, 16(4), 361–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bharati, P., & Chaudhury, A. (2008). IT outsourcing adoption by small and medium enterprises: A diffusion innovation approach. In Proceedings of the Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS), Toronto, Canada. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chuck, M. (1998). In net future: The 7 Cyber-trens that will drive your business, create new wealth, and define your future. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  6. Combe, C. (2008). Introduction to e-business. New Delhi: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  7. Cragg, P. B., & King, M. (1993). Small-firm computing: Motivators and inhibitors. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 17(1), 47–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. DeLone, W. H. (1988). Determinants of success for computer usage in small businesses. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 12(1), 51–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Falnney, J., Blackburn, I., & Deeter M. (November 2009). New ways of working together in the consumer goods-to-retail supply chain, Telecast on supply chain TV. Available at, Nov 2009.
  10. Gregory, S. S. (2006). Straight to the top: Becoming a world-class CIO. New Jersey: Wiley.Google Scholar
  11. Grover, S. K., & Lederer, A. L. (2001). Strategic it alignment: A model for competitive advantage. Twenty-Second International Conference on Information Systems (CASiE’10), Tunisia.Google Scholar
  12. Heeks, R. B. (2002). Information systems and developing countries: failure, success and local improvisations. The Information Society, 14(1), 101–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Igbaria, M., Zinatelli, N., Craig, P. B., & Cavaye, A. L. M. (1997). Personal computing acceptance factors in small firms: A structural equation model. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 21(3), 279–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Joseph, G. S. J., & Mohapatra, S. (2008). Managing information system in knowledge economy. New Delhi: PHI.Google Scholar
  15. Lacovou, C. L., Benbasat, I., & Dexter, A. S. (1995). Electronic data interchange and small ­organizations: adoption and impact of technology. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 19(4), 465–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lefebvre, L., & Lefebvre, E. (1993). Competitive positioning and innovative efforts in SMEs. Small Business Economics, 5(4), 297–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Mclean, E. R., & Turban, E. (2005). Information technology for management (5th ed.). Edison: Wiley.Google Scholar
  18. Mckinsey (2009). Available at, Apr 2009.
  19. Mohapatra, S. (2009). Business process automation. New Delhi: PHI.Google Scholar
  20. Nolan, R. L. (2001). Information technology management from 1960–2000 (technical note no. 9-301-147). Harvard Business School, June, Massachusetts, USA.Google Scholar
  21. Parsons, G. L. (1983). Information technology: A new competitive weapon. Sloan Management Review, 25(1), 3–14.Google Scholar
  22. Porter, M. E. (1979). How competitive forces shape strategy. Harvard Business Review, 57, 137.Google Scholar
  23. Porter, M. E. (1996). What is strategy. Harvard Business Review.Google Scholar
  24. Porter, M. E. (2001). Strategy and the internet. Harvard Business Review, 79(3), 62.Google Scholar
  25. Prananto, A., McKay, J., & Marshall, P. (2003). The spectrum of e-business maturity in Australian SMEs: a multiple case study approach to the applicability of the stages of growth for e-business model. In Proceedings of the 11th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS), Naples, Italy.Google Scholar
  26. Quale, M., & Christiansen, J. (2004). Business issues in the 21st century. In N. Al-Qirim (Ed.), Electronic commerce in small to medium-sized enterprises: Frameworks, issues and implications. Hershey: Idea Group.Google Scholar
  27. Robert, D. A., Richard, L. N., & O’Donnell, S. (2009). The adventures of an IT leader. London: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  28. Rockart, J. F., & Scott Morton, M. S. (1984). Implications of changes in information technology for corporate strategy. Interfaces, 14(1), 84–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Smith, H., & Fingar, P. (2003). Business process management: The third wave. Tampa: ­Meghan-Kiffer Press.Google Scholar
  30. Spitz, J. M., & dePaschalis, E. G. (2005). The Quals of the ideal CIO. Research report #15, Published on the Systems Consulting Consortium, Inc.Google Scholar
  31. Thong, J. Y. L., Yap, C. S., & Raman, K. S. (1994). Engagement of external expertise in information systems implementation. Journal of Management Information Systems, 11(2), 209–231.Google Scholar
  32. Tse, T., & Soufani, K. (2003). Business strategies for small firms in the new economy. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 10(1), 306–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. White, M. A., & Bruton, G. D. (2007). The management of technology and innovation. New Delhi: Cengage.Google Scholar
  34. Whittle, R., & Myrick, C. (2004). Enterprise business architecture: The formal link between strategy and results. Boca Raton: CRC Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wieringa, R. (2004). Architecture is structure plus synergy. Accessed May 2010.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Information SystemXavier Institute of ManagementBhubaneswarIndia

Personalised recommendations