Incorporating Life-Cycle Economic and Environmental Factors in Managerial Decision-Making

  • Ravi Subramanian
Part of the International Series in Operations Research & Management Science book series (ISOR, volume 174)


Recent environmental trends, including (1) an expansion of existing command and control directives, (2) the introduction of market-based policy instruments, and (3) the adoption of extended producer responsibility, have created a need for new tools to help managerial decision-making. To address this need, we develop a nonlinear mathematical programming model from a profit-maximizing firm’s perspective, which can be tailored as a decision-support tool for firms facing environmental goals and constraints. We typify our approach using the specific context of diesel engine manufacturing and remanufacturing. The approach allows the incorporation of traditional operations planning considerations—in particular, capacity, production, and inventory—together with environmental considerations that range from product design through production to product end of life. A current hurdle to implementing such a model is the availability of input data. We therefore highlight the need to involve all departments within businesses and for industrial ecologists and business managers to work together to implement meaningful decision models that are based on accurate and timely data and can have positive economic and environmental impact.


Life Cycle Assessment Emission Allowance Machine Capacity Remanufactured Product Complex Tradeoff 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



This chapter is a summarized version of: Subramanian, R, B. Talbot, S. Gupta. 2010. An Approach to Integrating Environmental Considerations within Managerial Decision Making. Journal of Industrial Ecology 14(3) 378–398.


  1. Bloemhof-Ruwaard JM, van Beek P, Hordijk L, Van Wassenhove LN (1995) Interactions between operational research and environmental management. Eur J Oper Res 85:229–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. EC (European Commission) (2001) Green paper on integrated product policyGoogle Scholar
  3. EC (European Commission) (2011) Policies. Retrieved from Accessed 30 Jan 2011
  4. EPA (Environmental Protection Agency), United States (2005) Acid Rain Program: 2004 Progress ReportGoogle Scholar
  5. Environmental Resources Management (2005) Study and assessment of available information for a pilot project on a teak garden chair: final report. Oxford, UKGoogle Scholar
  6. Fourer R, Gay DM, Kernighan BW (2003) AMPL: A modeling language for mathematical programming. Brooks/Cole-Thomson Learning, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  7. Fourer R (2011) Nonlinear programming frequently asked questions. Retrieved from Accessed 30 Jan 2011
  8. NEOS (Network-Enabled Optimization System) (2011) Optimization software guide. Retrieved from Accessed 30 Jan 2011
  9. Nokia Corporation (2005) Integrated product policy pilot project\!: life cycle environmental issues of mobile phones. Espoo, FinlandGoogle Scholar
  10. Scheer D, Rubik F (eds) (2005) Governance of integrated product policy: in search of sustainable production and consumption. Greenleaf Publishing Ltd., Sheffield, UKGoogle Scholar
  11. Smith VM, Keoleian GA (2004) The value of remanufactured engines: life-cycle environmental and economic perspectives. J Ind Ecol 8(1–2):193–221Google Scholar
  12. Tukker A (2006) Identifying priorities for environmental product policy. J Ind Ecol 10(3):1–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Tukker A, Jansen B (2006) Environmental impacts of iroducts: a detailed review of studies. J Ind Ecol 10(3):159–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of ManagementGeorgia Institute of TechnologyAtlantaUSA

Personalised recommendations