Mobile Social Networking and the News

Part of the The Economics of Information, Communication and Entertainment book series (ECOINFORM)


In recent years, mainstream media coverage has integrated mobile social networking and micro-blogging tools such as Facebook and Twitter. These interactive communication channels have transformed our interpersonal relationships as well as our links with organizations and content including news and entertainment. In particular, our experience of the news has become mediated through these platforms. These tools have transformed one-way transmission channels into two-way interactive media. While there has been significant discussion of the role of online forums, listservs and blogs as arenas for democratic participation and citizen journalism, there has been less analysis of how micro-blogging social networking tools are transforming the social practices around news and information. Drawing on James Carey’s ritual view of communications, this chapter will analyze the role of these tools in the experience of our daily lives as well as our consumption of news and participation in significant media events of our time. First, this chapter will describe the changing habits of individual users in their daily news rituals. Second, this chapter will describe the ways in which news is represented on Facebook and Twitter as well as how these channels are reintegrated with mainstream media broadcasts. Third, this chapter will describe the use of CNN’s Facebook plug-in during political media events such as the 2008 Presidential election and the Obama inauguration in 2009. Finally, this chapter will recommend future directions for the use of mobile social networking in mainstream media coverage.


Social Networking Site News Story Privacy Setting Social Media Platform Status Update 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Anderson, B. (1983). Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism. New York: Verso.Google Scholar
  2. Bijker, W. E., Hughes, T. P., & Pinch, T. (1987). The social construction of technological systems. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  3. Carey, J. W. (1988). Communication as culture: Essays on media and society. New York: Unwin Hyman, Inc.Google Scholar
  4. Geiger, R. S. (2010). The work of sustaining order in wikipedia: The banning of a vandal. Paper presented at the Computer Supported Cooperative Work.Google Scholar
  5. Grimmelmann, J. (2009). Saving facebook. Iowa Law Review, 94(2000), 1137–1206.Google Scholar
  6. Howard, P. (2002). Network ethnography and the hypermedia organization: New media, new organizations, new methods. New Media & Society, 4(4), 550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Lenhart, A. (2009). Adults and social network websites. Washington, DC: Pew Internet and American Life Project.Google Scholar
  9. Nissenbaum, H. F. (2004). Privacy as contextual integrity. Washington Law Review, 79(1).Google Scholar
  10. Norman, D. A. (1990). The design of everyday things. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  11. Pelli, D. G., & Bigelow, C. (2009, October 20). A writing revolution. SEED.Google Scholar
  12. Perez, S. (2009, January 20). Facebook and CNN: The power of the social web revealed. ReadWriteWeb.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Interaction Design LabCornell UniversityIthacaUSA

Personalised recommendations