Advertisement

Mammary Ductoscopy

Chapter

Abstract

Endoscopy has revolutionized many aspects of medical care by allowing visual access through natural orifices or surgical minimal access to body cavities. The advent in the 1980s of improved optics allowed the development by the early 1990s of our first submillimeter endoscopes. Japanese breast surgeons faced at that time rapid increases of rates of breast cancer in young women. Because these were premenopausal women with dense small breasts lacking the fat distribution of Western women, mammographic identification and diagnosis was much more difficult than in the U.S. or Europe. More of these women presented with pathologic nipple discharge and Japanese surgeons such as Okazaki and others saw a potential use for these new endoscopes in the identification of nonpalpable, non-mammographically visible cancerous and precancerous lesions. With very limited optics and air insufflation of the ducts, they were able to navigate the first few centimeters of the ductal system and progressively identify more and more causes for the pathologic nipple discharge. Nipple ductoscopy offers a unique approach to visualizing certain forms of breast pathophysiology and could provide a new approach for biopsy and or treatment of various breast abnormalities in the future.

Keywords

Breast Cancer Ductal System Proliferative Lesion Ductal Lavage Biopsy Device 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Okazaki A, Okazaki M, Asaishi K, Satoh H, Watanabe Y, Mikami T, et al. Fiberoptic ductoscopy of the breast: a new diagnostic procedure for nipple discharge. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 1991;21(3):188–93.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Okazaki A, Okazaki M, Hirata K, Tsumanuma T. Progress of ductoscopy of the breast. Nippon Geka Gakkai Zasshi. 1996;97(5):357–62.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Okazaki A, Hirata K, Okazaki M, Svane G, Azabedo E. Nipple discharge disorders; current diagnostic management and the role of fiberductoscoy. Eur Radiol. 1999;9(4):583–90.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Shen KW, Wu J, Lu JS, Han QZ, Shen ZZ, Nguyen M, et al. Fiberoptic ductoscopy for patients with nipple discharge. Cancer. 2000;89(7):1512–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Shao ZM, Liu Y, Nguyen M. The role of the breast ductal system in the diagnosis of cancer (review). Oncol Rep. 2001;8(1):153–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Matsunaga T, Ohta D, Misaka T, Hosokawa K, Fujii M, Kaise H, et al. Mammary ductoscopy for diagnosis and treatment of intraductal lesions of the breast. Breast Cancer. 2001;8(3): 213–21.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Shen KW, Wu J, Lu JS, Han QX, Shen ZZ, Nguyen M, et al. Fiberoptic ductoscopy for breast cancer patients with nipple discharge. Surg Endosc. 2001;15(11):1340–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Yamamoto D, Shoji T, Kawanishi H, Nakagawa H, Haijima H, Gondo H, et al. A utility of ductography and fiberoptic ductoscopy for patients with nipple discharge. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2001;70(2):103–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Yamamoto D, Ueda S, Senzaki H, Shoji T, Haijima H, Gondo H, et al. New diagnostic approach to intracystic lesions of the breast by fiberoptic ductoscopy. Anticancer Res. 2001;21(6A):4113–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Makita M, Akiyama F, Gomi N, Ikenaga M, Yoshimoto M, Kasumi F, et al. Endoscopic classification of intraductal lesions and histological diagnosis. Breast Cancer. 2002;9(3):220–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tamaki Y, Miyoshi Y, Noguchi S. Application of endoscopic surgery for breast cancer treatment. Nippon Geka Gakkai Zasshi. 2002;103(11):835–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Love SM, Barsky Sh. Breast-duct endoscopy to study stages of cancerous breast disease. Lancet. 1996;348(9033):997–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Papanicolaou GN, Holmquist DG, Bader GM, Falk EA. Exfoliative cytology of the human mammary gland and its value in the diagnosis of cancer and other diseases of the breast. Cancer. 1958;11:377–409.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wrensch MR, Petrakis NL, King EB, Mike R, Mason L, Chew K, et al. Breast cancer incidence in women with abnormal cytology in nipple aspirates of breast fluid. Am J Epidemiol. 1992;135:130–41.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Dupont WD, Page DL. Risk factors for breast cancer in women with proliferative breast disease. N Engl J Med. 1985;312:146–51.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Dupont WD, Parl FF, Hartmann WH, Brinton LA, Winfield AC, Worrell JA, et al. Breast cancer risk associated with proliferative breast disease and atypical hyperplasia. Cancer. 1993;71:1258–65.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Fabian CJ, Kimler BF, Zalles CM, Klemp JR, Kamel S, Zeiger S, et al. Short-term breast cancer prediction by random periareolar fine-needle aspiration cytology and the Gail risk model. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000;92:1217–27.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Fisher B, Costantino JP, Wickerham DL, Redmond CK, Kavanah M, Cronin WM, et al. Tamoxifen for prevention of breast cancer: report of the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project P-1 Study. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1998;90:1371–88.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Dooley WC, Ljung B-M, Veronesi U, Cazzaniga M, Elledge RM, O’Shaughnessy JA, et al. Ductal lavage for detection of cellular atypia in women at high risk for breast cancer. J Natl Can Inst. 2001;93(21):1624–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Dooley WC. Ductal lavage, nipple aspiration, and ductoscopy for breast cancer diagnosis. Curr Oncol Rep. 2003;5(1):63–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Khan SA, Baird C, Staradub VL, Morrow M. Ductal lavage and ductoscopy: the opportunities and the limitations. Clin Breast Cancer. 2002;3(3):185–91; discussion 192–5.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Khan SA, Wiley EL, Rodriguez N, Baird C, Ramakrishnan R, Nayar R, et al. Ductal lavage findings in women with known breast cancer undergoing mastectomy. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004;96(20):1510–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sauter ER, Klein-Szanto A, Eha H, Mac Gibbon B. Ductoscopic cytology and image analysis to detect breast carcinoma. Cancer. 2004;101(6):1283–92.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Brogi E, Robson M, Panageas KS, Casadio C, Ljung BM, Montgomery L. Ductal lavage in patients undergoing mastectomy for mammary carcinoma: a correlative study. Cancer. 2003;98(10):2170–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Evron E, Dooley WC, Umbricht CB, Rosenthal D, Sacchi N, Gabrielson E, et al. Detection of breast cancer cells in ductal lavage fluid by methlation-specific PCR. Lancet. 2001;357: 1335–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Moroni M, Soldatenkov V, Zhang L, Zhang Y, Stoica G, Gehan E, et al. Progressive loss of Syk and abnormal proliferation in breast cancer cells. Cancer Res. 2004;64(20):7346–54.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Dulaimi E, Hillinck J, Ibanez de Caceres I, Al-Saleem T, Cairns P. Tumor suppressor gene promoter hypermethylation in serum of breast cancer patients. Clin Cancer Res. 2004;10(18 pt 1):6189–93.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Krishnamurthy S, Zhao L, Hayes K, Glassman AB, Cristofanilli M, Singletary SE, et al. Feasibility and utility of using chromosomal aneusomy to further define the cytologic categories in nipple aspirate fluid specimens: a preliminary study. Cancer. 2004;102(5):322–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Fackler MJ, McVeigh M, Mehrotra J, Blum MA, Lange J, Lapides A, et al. Quantitative multiplex methylation-specific PCR assay for the detection of promoter hypermethylation in multiple genes in breast cancer. Cancer Res. 2004;64(13):4442–52.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Isaacs C, Cavalli LR, Cohen Y, Pennanen M, Shankar LK, Freedman M, et al. Detection of LOH and mitochondrial DNA alterations in ductal lavage and nipple aspirate fluids from high-risk patients. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2004;84(2):99–105.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Dooley WC. Endoscopic visualization of breast tumors. JAMA. 2000;284(12):1518.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Dooley WC. Routine operative breast endoscopy during lumpectomy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2003;10(1):38–42.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Dietz JR, Crowe JP, Grundfest S, Arrigain S, Kim JA. Directed duct excision by using mammary ductoscopy in patients with pathologic nipple discharge. Surgery. 2002;132(4):582–7; discussion 587–8.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Dooley WC. Routine operative breast endoscopy for bloody nipple discharge. Ann Surg Oncol. 2002;9(9):920–3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Dooley WC, Francescatti D, Clark L, Webber G. Office-based breast ductoscopy for diagnosis. Am J Surg. 2004;188(4):415–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Jacobs VR, Paepke S, Schaaf H, Weber BC, Kiechle-Bahat M. Autofluorescence ductoscopy; a new imaging technique for intraductal breast endoscopy. Clin Breast Cancer. 2007;8:619–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Hunerbein M, Raubach M, Gebauer B, Schneider W, Schlag PM. Ductoscopy and intraductal vacuum assisted biopsy in women with pathologic nipple discharge. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2006;3:301–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Dooley WC. The intraductal approach to breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15:3331–2.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Badve S. Ductal lavage and its histopathologic basis: a cautionary tale. Diagn Cytopathol. 2004;30(3):166–71.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Ljung BM, Chew KL, Moore II DH, King EB. Cytology of ductal lavage fluid of the breast. Diagn Cytopathol. 2004;30(3):143–50.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer New York 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SurgeryOklahoma University Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma UniversityOklahoma CityUSA

Personalised recommendations