Advertisement

Image-Guided Breast Biopsy

  • Venita Chandra
  • Frederick M. Dirbas
  • Debra M. Ikeda
Chapter

Abstract

Image-guided biopsies may be used to diagnose nonpalpable, abnormal findings on a mammogram, ultrasound, or breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) study. Historically, image-guided open surgical biopsy was the customary diagnostic approach to these problems. Increasingly, percutaneous biopsy with image guidance is replacing open biopsy as the initial intervention to help plan patient management and, often, to plan definitive surgery. Given the importance of image-guided biopsy and its increasing role in clinical practice, a good understanding of image-guided biopsy options, their advantages and limitations, is an essential component of a breast surgical practice. This chapter will describe percutaneous X-ray, ultrasound and MRI breast needle biopsy techniques, preoperative needle localization, and imaging-pathology correlation while offering a framework for handling more complex situations when both occult and palpable findings coexist.

Keywords

Core Biopsy Core Needle Biopsy Excisional Biopsy Fine Needle Aspiration Biopsy Stereotactic Biopsy 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Martin HE, Ellis EB. Biopsy by needle puncture and aspiration. Ann Surg. 1930;92(2): 169–81.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Stewart FW. The diagnosis of tumors by aspiration. Am J Pathol. 1933;9:801–12.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lofgren M, Anderson I, Lindholm K. Stereotactic fine-needle aspiration for cytologic diagnosis of nonpalpable breast lesions. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1990;154(6):1191–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Vimpeli SM, Saarenmaa I, Huhtala H, Soimakallio S. Large-core needle biopsy versus fine-needle aspiration biopsy in solid breast lesions: comparison of costs and diagnostic value. Acta Radiol. 2008;49(8):863–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Shyyan R, Masood S, Badwe RA, Errico KM, Liberman L, Ozmen V, et al. Breast cancer in limited-resource countries: diagnosis and pathology. Breast J. 2006;12 Suppl 1:S27–37.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lindgren PG. Percutaneous needle biopsy. A new technique. Acta Radiologica Diagn. 1982;23(6):653–6.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jackman RJ, Marzoni FA. Stereotactic histologic biopsy with patients prone: technical feasibility in 98% of mammographically detected lesions. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003;180(3): 785–94.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Goodman KA, Birdwell RL, Ikeda DM. Compliance with recommended follow-up after percutaneous breast core biopsy. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1998;170(1):89–92.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Pal S, Ikeda DM, Birdwell RL. Compliance with recommended follow-up after fine-needle aspiration biopsy of nonpalpable breast lesions: a retrospective study. Radiology. 1996;201(1): 71–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kerlikowske K, Smith-Bindman R, Ljung B-M, Grady D. Evaluation of abnormal mammography results and palpable breast abnormalities. Ann Intern Med. 2003;139(4):274–84.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Verkooijen HM, Peeters PH, Pijnappel RM, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of needle-localized open breast biopsy for impalpable breast disease. Br J Surg. 2000;87(3):344–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    White RR, Halperin TJ, Olson JA, et al. Impact of core-needle breast biopsy on the surgical management of mammographic abnormalities. Ann Surg. 2001;233(6):769–77.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Stomper PC, Winston JS, Proulx GM, et al. Mammographic detection and staging of ductal carcinoma in situ: mammographic-pathologic correlation. Semin Breast Dis. 2000;3(1): 26–41.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Schueller G, Schueller-Weidekamm C, Helbich TH. Accuracy of ultrasound-guided, ­large-core needle breast biopsy. Eur Radiol. 2008;18(9):1761–73.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Liberman L, LaTrenta LR, Dershaw DD, et al. Impact of core biopsy on the surgical ­management of impalpable breast cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1997;168(2):495–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Jackman RJ, Burbank F, Parker SH, et al. Atypical ductal hyperplasia diagnosed at stereotactic breast biopsy: improved reliability with 14-gauge, directional, vacuum-assisted biopsy. Radiology. 1997;204(2):485–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Fornage BD, Faroux MJ, Simatos A. Breast masses: US-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy. Radiology. 1987;162(2):409–14.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Liberman L, Ernberg LA, Heerdt A, et al. Palpable breast masses: is there a role for percutaneous imaging-guided core biopsy? AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000;175(3):779–87.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hatada T, Aoki I, Okada K, et al. Usefulness of ultrasound-guided, fine-needle aspiration biopsy for palpable breast tumors. Arch Surg. 1996;131(10):1095–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hazard HW, Hansen NM. Image-guided procedures for breast masses. Adv Surg. 2007;41: 257–72.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hoorntje LE, Peeters PH, Mali WP, Borel Rinkes IH. Vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: a critical review. Eur J Cancer. 2003;39(12):1676–83.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Gruber R, Jaromi S, Gloery D, Memarsadeghi M, Helbich TH. Cost-effectiveness of US-guided 14-G core needle breast biopsy (CNBB) versus open surgical excision. Vienna: Medical University of Vienna; 2006.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Saslow D, Boetes C, Burke W, et al. American Cancer Society guidelines for breast screening with MRI as an adjunct to mammography. CA Cancer J Clin. 2007;57(2):75–89.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Orel SG, Schnall MD. MR imaging of the breast for the detection, diagnosis, and staging of breast cancer. Radiology. 2001;220(1):13–30.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kuhl CK, Morakkabati N, Leutner CC, Schmiedel A, Wardelmann E, Schild HH. MR imaging–guided large-core (14-gauge) needle biopsy of small lesions visible at breast MR imaging alone. Radiology. 2001;220(1):31–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Daniel BL, Birdwell RL, Ikeda DM, Jeffrey SS, Black JW, Block WF, et al. Breast lesion localization: a freehand, interactive MR imaging-guided technique. Radiology. 1998;207(2):455–63.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Wallace AM, Daniel BL, Jeffrey SS, et al. Rates of reexcision for breast cancer after magnetic resonance imaging-guided bracket wire localization. J Am Coll Surg. 2005;200(4):527–37.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ljung BM, Drejet A, Chiampi N, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of fine-needle aspiration biopsy is determined by physician training in sampling technique. Cancer. 2001;93(4):263–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Giard RW, Hermans J. The diagnostic information of tests for the detection of cancer: the usefulness of the likelihood ratio concept. Eur J cancer. 1996;32A(12):2042–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Hall FM, Storella JM, Silverstone DZ, Wyshak G. Nonpalpable breast lesions: recommendations for biopsy based on suspicion of carcinoma at mammography. Radiology. 1988;167(2): 353–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Lofgren M, Andersson I, Bondeson L, Lindholm K. X-ray guided fine-needle aspiration for the cytologic diagnosis of nonpalpable breast lesions. Cancer. 1988;61(5):1032–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Ciatto S, Cariaggi P, Bulgaresi P. The value of routine cytologic examination of breast cyst fluids. Acta cytologica. 1987;31(3):301–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Pisano ED, Fajardo LL, Caudry DJ, et al. Fine-needle aspiration biopsy of nonpalpable breast lesions in a multicenter clinical trial: results from the radiologic diagnostic oncology group V. Radiology. 2001;219(3):785–92.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Masood S. Fine-needle aspiration biopsy of nonpalpable breast lesions: challenges and promises. Cancer. 1998;84(4):197–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Rim A, Chellman-Jeffers M. Trends in breast cancer screening and diagnosis. Cleve Clin J Med. 2008;75 Suppl 1:S2–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Boerner S, Fornage BD, Singletary E, Sneige N. Ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (FNA) of nonpalpable breast lesions: a review of 1885 FNA cases using the National Cancer Institute-supported recommendations on the uniform approach to breast FNA. Cancer. 1999; 87(1):19–24.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Litherland JC. Should fine needle aspiration cytology in breast assessment be abandoned? Clin Radiol. 2002;57(2):81–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Verkooijen HM, Peeters PH, Buskens E, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of large-core needle biopsy for nonpalpable breast disease: a meta-analysis. Br J cancer. 2000;82(5):1017–21.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Verkooijen HM. Diagnostic accuracy of stereotactic large-core needle biopsy for nonpalpable breast disease: results of a multicenter prospective study with 95% surgical confirmation. Int J Cancer. 2002;99(6):853–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Yim JH, Barton P, Weber B, et al. Mammographically detected breast cancer. Benefits of stereotactic core versus wire localization biopsy. Ann Surg. 1996;223(6):688–97. discussion 697.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Gundry KR, Berg WA. Treatment issues and core needle breast biopsy: clinical context. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1998;171(1):41–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Brenner RJ, Jackman RJ, Parker SH, Evans III WP, Philpotts L, Deutch BM, et al. Percutaneous core needle biopsy of radial scars of the breast: when is excision necessary? AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002;179(5):1179–84.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Shin HJ, Kim HH, Kim SM, Yang HR, Sohn JH, Kwon GY, et al. Papillary lesions of the breast diagnosed at percutaneous sonographically guided biopsy: comparison of sonographic features and biopsy methods. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008;190(3):630–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer New York 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Venita Chandra
  • Frederick M. Dirbas
  • Debra M. Ikeda
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of RadiologyStanford University School of MedicineStanfordUSA

Personalised recommendations