Metapopulation Models in Tick-Borne Disease Transmission Modelling
Human monocytic ehrlichiosis (Ehrlichia chaffeensis), or HME, is a tick-transmitted, ricksettisal disease with growing impact in the United States. Risk of a tick-borne disease such as HME to humans can be estimated using the prevalence of that disease in the tick population. A deterministic model for HME is explored to investigate the underlying dynamics of prevalence in tick populations, particularly when spatial considerations are allowed. The dynamics of HME in a single spatial patch are considered first to determine which model components are most important to predicting disease dynamics in a local ecology. The model is then expanded to spatially-explicit patches on which patch connectivity, the surrounding environment and boundary effects are studied. The results of this investigation show that predicting risk of this disease to humans is determined by many complicated interactions. Areas that would be endemic in isolation may or may not sustain the disease depending on the surrounding habitat. Similarly, control efforts are shown to be far more effective when applied in wooded habitats than in neighboring grassy habitats. Boundary assumptions which describe the reality of increasing habitat fragmentation additionally play a large role in predicting the endemicity of an HME outbreak. Overall, HME and all tick-borne diseases are complex, nonlinear systems that have just begun to be explored.
KeywordsLatin Hypercube Sampling Wooded Area Metapopulation Model Infected Tick Tick Population
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 2.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Summary of notifiable diseases—United States, 2005, MMWR Weekly 2007; 54(53):2–92.Google Scholar
- 3.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Summary of notifiable diseases—United States, 2001, MMWR Weekly 2003; 50(53):1–108.Google Scholar
- 9.Ewing SA, Dawson JE, Kocan AA et al. Experimental transmission of Ehrlichia chaffeensis (Ehrlichieae) among white-tailed deer by Amblyomma americanum (Acari: Ixodidae). J Med Entomol 1995; 34:368–374.Google Scholar
- 13.Hanski I, Simberloff D. The metapopulation approach. In: Hanski I, Gilpin ME, eds. Metapopulation Biology: Ecology, Genetics and Evolution. San Diego: Academic Press, 1997:5–26.Google Scholar
- 14.Hanski I, Gilpin ME. Conceptual foundations. In: Hanski I, Gilpin ME, eds. Metapopulation Biology: Ecology, Genetics and Evolution. San Diego: Academic Press, 1997:1–4.Google Scholar
- 15.Wiens J. Metapopulation dynamics and landscape ecology. In: Hanski I, Gilpin ME, eds. Metapopulation Biology: Ecology, Genetics and Evolution. San Diego: Academic Press, 1997:43–62.Google Scholar
- 18.Hanski I. Metapopulation ecology, great britain: Oxford University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
- 19.Blower SM, Dowlatabadi H. Sensitivity and uncertainty analysis of complex models of disease transmission: an HIV model, as an example. Int Stat Rev 1994; 2:229–243.Google Scholar
- 21.Gaff H, Schaefer E. Results from a mathematical model for human monocytic ehrlichiosis. Proceedings of the 5th Conference on Rickettsiae and Rickettsial Diseases, a Supplement to Clinical Microbiology and Infection, to appear.Google Scholar
- 22.Comins HN, Hassell MP, May RM. The spatial dynamics of host—parasitoid systems. J Anim Ecol 1992; 61(3):735–748.ai]44._Woolhouse MEJ, Chandiwana SK. Population biology of the freshwater snail bulinus-globosus in the Zimbabwe highveld. Journal of Applied Ecology 1990; 27(1):41–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar