Algebraic Number Theory

Part of the Undergraduate Texts in Mathematics book series (UTM)


Another concept of abstract algebra that emerged from the old algebra of equations was that of ring, which arose from attempts to find integer solutions of equations. The first steps towards the ring concept were taken by Euler (1770b), who discovered equations whose integer solutions are most easily found with the help of irrational or imaginary numbers. Gauss realized that these auxiliary numbers work because they behave like integers. In particular, they admit a concept of “prime” for which unique prime factorization holds. In the 1840s and 1850s the idea of “algebraic integers” was pushed further by various mathematicians, and it reached maturity when Dedekind (1871) defined the concept of algebraic integer in a number field of finite degree. By this time, considerable experience with number fields had been acquired, and Kummer had noticed that such fields do not always admit unique prime factorization. Kummer found a way around this difficulty by introducing new objects that he called ideal numbers (in analogy with “ideal” objects in geometry, such as points at infinity). Dedekind replaced Kummer’s undefined “ideal numbers” by concrete sets of numbers that he called ideals. He was then able to restore unique prime factorization by proving that it holds for ideals. Ring theory as we know it today is largely the result of building a general setting for Dedekind’s theory of ideals. It owes its existence to Emmy Noether, who used to say that “it’s already in Dedekind.”


Algebraic Number Integer Solution Principal Ideal Algebraic Integer Algebraic Number Theory 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Artin, M. (1991). Algebra. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall Inc.Google Scholar
  2. Cox, D. A. (1989). Primes of the Form x 2 + ny 2. New York: John Wiley & Sons Inc.Google Scholar
  3. Eisenstein, G. (1850). Über einige allgemeine Eigenschaften der Gleichung, von welcher die Theorie der ganzen Lemniscate abhängt. J. reine und angew. Math. 39, 556–619.Google Scholar
  4. Hilbert, D. (1897). The Theory of Algebraic Number Fields. Translated from the German and with a preface by Iain T. Adamson. With an introduction by Franz Lemmermeyer and Norbert Schappacher. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1998.Google Scholar
  5. McKean, H. and V. Moll (1997). Elliptic Curves. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.MATHGoogle Scholar
  6. Stillwell, J. (2003). Elements of Number Theory. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.MATHGoogle Scholar
  7. Weber, H. (1892). Leopold von Kronecker. Jahresber. Deutsch. Math. Verein. 2, 19.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of MathematicsUniversity of San FranciscoSan FranciscoUSA

Personalised recommendations