Advertisement

Packaging and the Supply Chain: A Look at Transportation

  • Rachel Simon
  • Yifen Chen
Chapter

Abstract

In the interest of sustainability, many manufacturers have taken steps to analyze the key components of their products and processes across the span of their supply chain. Product packaging—which is an especially pervasive component, spanning across the supply chain of nearly all products—has garnered particular interest in discussions of sustainability. Packaging is not only associated with its own sourcing impacts but also influences the impacts of the product, especially in terms of the shipping impacts of the product. Several organizations have developed tools and guidelines to help manufacturers make greener packaging choices in terms of packaging. Pallet utilization is one practice for improving packaging that has been put forth in these publications and is one of the few practices that consider the impacts of packaging, not only in the context of its own supply chain but also as a component of a product. This study discusses the practice of pallet utilization and identifies the cases in which it would serve as potentially beneficial. These considerations are currently lacking in the recommendations for the adoption of pallet utilization. In addition, an overview of the current methodologies used to evaluate the environmental impacts of transportation and to optimize the distribution of the product is provided.

Keywords

Supply Chain Shipping Container Packaging System Weight Constraint Freight Transportation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Hekkert MP, Joosten LAJ, Worrell E (2000) Reduction of CO2 emissions by improved management of material and product use: the case of transport packaging. Resour Conserv Recycl 30(1):1–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Rokka J, Uusitalo L (2008) Preference for green packaging in consumer product choices—do consumers care? Int J Consum Stud 32:516–525CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Brachfeld D, Dritz T, Kodama S, Phipps A, Steiner E, Keoleian G (2001) Life cycle assessment of the Stonyfield Farm product delivery system. Center for Sustainable Systems, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MichiganGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Verghese K, Lewis H (2007) Environmental innovation in industrial packaging: a supply chain approach. Int J Prod Res 45(18):4381MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Butler NB (2007) What’s in store for plastic bags. Resour Recycl 26(6):15–19Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Stafford B (2007) China and forest trade in the Asia-Pacific region: implications for forests and livelihoods. Environmental Aspects of China’s Papermaking Fiber Supply. Prepared for Forest Trends. http://www.forest-trends.org/documents/files/doc_521.pdf. Accessed 15 Apr 2011
  7. 7.
    USGS (2009) Minerals yearbook 2008. US Department of the Interior, Bureau of Mines, Reston, VAGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    WRAP (2009b) The Chinese markets for recovered paper and plastics. Market situation report—Spring 2009. http://www.wrap.org.uk/downloads/China_MSR.95cc7faa.6971.pdf. Accessed 15 Apr 2011
  9. 9.
    American Chemistry Council (2010) The resin review. The annual statistical report for the North American plastics industry, 2010th edn. American Chemistry Council, Arlington, VAGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ekvall T (2000) A market-based approach to allocation at open-loop recycling. Resour Conserv Recycl 29(1–2):91–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Frichknecht R (2000) Allocation in life cycle inventory analysis for joint production. Int J LCA 5:85–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Reap J, Roman F, Duncan S, Bras B (2008) A survey of unresolved problems in life cycle Assessment. Part I: goals and scope and inventory analysis. Int J Life Cycle Assess 13:290–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sayagh S, Ventura A, Hoang T, François D, Jullien A (2010) Sensitivity of the LCA allocation procedure for BFS recycled into pavement structures. Resour Conserv Recycl 54(6):348–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Schneider F (1994) Allocation and recycling: enlarging to the cascade system. Proceedings of the European Workshop on Allocation in LCA, Leiden, pp 39–53Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Weidema BP (2001) Avoiding co-product allocation in life cycle assessment. J Ind Ecol 4:11–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Huppes G, Schneider F (1994) Proceedings of the European workshop on Allocation in LCA. Centre of Environmental Science of Leiden University CML, Leiden, 24–25 FebruaryGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Huppes G (1994) A general method for allocation in LCA. In: Huppes G, Schneider F (eds) Proceedings of the European workshop. Center for Environmental Sciences, Leiden University, Leiden, the NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Frischknecht R (1998) Life cycle inventory analysis for decision-making. scope-dependent inventory system models and context-specific joint product allocation. Ph.D. diss., Swiss Federal Institute of Technology. Zürich, ESU-servicesGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bakshi BR, Gutowski TG, Sekulic DP (2011) Thermodynamics and the destruction of resources. The Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Nicholson A (2009) Methods for managing uncertainty in material selection decisions: robustness of early stage life cycle assessment. MS Tthesis, Department of Mechanical Engineering, MITGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Frischknecht R (2007) LCI modelling approaches applied on recycling of materials in view of environmental sustainability, risk perception and eco-efficiency. recovery of materials and energy for resource efficiency. World Congress, Davos, Switzerland, 3–5 September 2007Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Moore Recycling Associates Inc (2008) 2006 national post-consumer recycled plastic bag and film report. Prepared for the Plastics Division of the American Chemistry Council, Arlington, VAGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Moore Recycling Associates Inc (2009) 2007 national post-consumer recycled plastic bag and film report. Prepared for the Plastics Division of the American Chemistry Council, Arlington, VAGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Moore Recycling Associates Inc (2010) 2008 national post-consumer recycled plastic bag and film report. Prepared for the Plastics Division of the American Chemistry Council, Arlington, VAGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Koltun P, Tharumarajah A, Ramakrishnan S (2005) An approach to treatment of recycling in LCA study. The fourth Australian LCA Conference, Sydney, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Gustafsson K, Jonson G, Smith DLG, Sparks, L (2006) Retailing logistics and fresh food packaging; managing change in the supply chain, London Kogan Page.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Lilienfeld R (2007) Review of life cycle data relating to disposable, compostable biodegradable, and reusable grocery bags. The ULS report. http://use-less-stuff.com/Paper-and-Plastic-Grocery-Bag-LCA-Summary.pdf. Accessed 1 Jul 2011
  28. 28.
    Zhang T, Reich-Weiser C, Nelson J, Farschi R, Minassians AD, Dornfeld D, Horne S (2008) Calculating a realistic energy payback time for a solfocus concentrator pv system. Laboratory for Manufacturing and Sustainability, UC BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Pa A, Craven J, Bi XT, Melin S, Sokhansanj S (2009) Evaluations of domestic applications of british columbia wood pellets based on life cycle analysis. life cycle assessment IX: toward the global life cycle economy, Boston, 29 September to 2 OctoberGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Weber C, Matthews HS (2008) Food-miles and the relative climate impacts of food choices in the United States. J Environ Sci Technol 42(10):3508–3513CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Environmental Protection Agency (2006) Light-duty automotive technology and fuel economy trends: 1975 through 2006. http://www.epa.gov/otaq/fetrends.htm. Accessed 15 Apr 2011
  32. 32.
    EIA (2008) Annual Energy Outlook 2008 with Projections to 2030. US Department of EnergyGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Bomberg MS, Kockelman KM, Thompson MR (2008) Greenhouse gas emission control options: assessing transportation and electricity generation technologies and policies to stabilize climate change. Presented at 88th annual meeting of the transportation research board, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Frey HC, Kuo PY (2007) Best practices guidebook for greenhouse gas reductions in freight transportation. North Carolina State University. http://www4.ncsu.edu/~frey/reports/Frey_Kuo_071004.pdf. Accessed 15 Apr 2011
  35. 35.
    Davies J, Facanha C, Aamidor J (2007) Greenhouse gas emissions from US freight sources: using activity data to interpret trends and reduce uncertainty. Proceedings of the 87th annual meeting of the transportation research boardGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Reich-Weiser C, Dornfeld DA (2009) A discussion of greenhouse gas emission tradeoffs and water scarcity within the supply chain. J Manuf Syst 28(1):23–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Facanha C (2006) Life-cycle air emissions inventory of freight transportation in the United States. Ph.D. thesis, University of California at BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Spielmann M, Scholz RW (2004) Life cycle inventories of transport services: background data for freight transport. Int J LCA 10(1):85–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    World Resources Institute (2008) GHG protocol tool for mobile combustion. Version 2.2. http://www.ghgprotocol.org/calculation-tools/all-tools. Accessed 1 Jul 2011
  40. 40.
    Fernie J, McKinnon AC (2009) The development of E-tail logistics. In: Fernie J, Sparks L (eds) Retail management and logistics, 3rd edn. Kogan Page, LondonGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Matthews HS, Williams E, Tagami T, Hendrickson C (2002) Energy implications of online book retailing in the United States and Japan. Environ Impact Assess Rev 22:493–507CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Williams E, Tagami T (2003) Energy use in sales and distribution via E-commerce and conventional retail. J Ind Ecol 6(2):99–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    "DEFRA (2005a) Guidelines for company reporting on greenhouse gas emissions annexes. Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, London, July. http://archive.defra.gov.uk/environment/business/reporting/pdf/envrpgas-annexes.pdf. Accessed 4 Jan 2011
  44. 44.
    US Department of Energy (2004) US energy intensity indicators: transportation sector. energy efficiency and renewable energy. http://intensityindicators.pnl.gov/trend_data.stm. Accessed 15 Apr 2011
  45. 45.
    Facanha C, Horvath A (2007) Evaluation of life cycle air emission factors of freight transportation. J Environ Sci Technol 41:7138–7144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    McKinnon AC (2007) CO2 emissions from freight transport in the UK. Commission for Integrated Transport, LondonGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    World Business Council for Sustainable Development and World Resources Institute (2009) GHG emissions from transport or mobile sources. http://www.ghgprotocol.org/downloads/calcs/WRI_Transport_Tool.xls. Accessed 15 Apr 2011
  48. 48.
    Helms H, Lambrecht U (2007) The potential contribution of light-weighting to reduce transport energy consumption. Int J LCA 12(1):58–64Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Büttner A, Heyn J (1999) Umwelt- und Kostenbilanz im Fahrzeugrohbau: Aluminium, Stahl und Edelstahl. VDI Berichte 1488. VDI, Düsseldorf, pp 137–152Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Pearce JM, Johnson SJ, Grant GB (2007) 3D-mapping optimization of embodied energy of transportation. Resour Conserv Recycl 51:435–453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Cummins Engine Company (2006) Secrets of better fuel economy, the physics of MPG. http://cumminsengines.com/assets/pdf/Secrets%20of%20Better%20Fuel%20Economy_whitepaper.pdf. Accessed 15 Apr 2011
  52. 52.
    McKinnon AC, Edwards JB (2009) The greening of retail logistics. In: Fernie J, Sparks L (eds) Retail management and logistics, 3rd edn. Kogan Page, LondonGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    McKinnon AC (2008) The potential of economic incentives to reduce CO2 emissions from goods transport. Paper prepared for the first International Transport Forum on Transport and Energy: the Challenge of Climate Change, LeipzigGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Europen (2009) The European shopping baskets, packaging trends for fast-moving consumer goods in selected European countries. Part 1: first data collection. Brussels, BelgiumGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Envirowise (2002) Packaging design for the environment: reducing costs and quantities. GG360R. Harwel International Business Centre, Didcot, OxfordshireGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    WRAP (2009a) A guide to evolving packaging design. www.wrap.org.uk/retail/the_guide_to_evolving_packaging_design. Accessed 15 Apr 2011
  57. 57.
    INCPEN (2003) Responsible packaging—code of practice for optimising packaging and minimising packaging waste. The Industry Council for Packaging and the Environment, ReadingGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Envirowise, Incpen (2008) Packguide: a guide to packaging eco-design. http://www.incpen.org/docs/PackGuide.pdf. Accessed 15 Apr 2011
  59. 59.
    Kraft Foods (2010) Kraft foods starts new year 150 million pounds lighter: sustainable packaging design, sourcing and partnerships remove weight equivalent of more than 150 fully loaded jumbo jets from supply chain. http://www.kraftfoodscompany.com/mediacenter/country-press-releases/us/2010/multi_media_01262010.aspx. Accessed 25 Sept 2011
  60. 60.
    Casey L (2009) Kraft redesigns crystal light packaging for better shelf appeal and sustainability. packaging digest. http://www.packagingdigest.com/article/367382-Kraft_redesigns_Crystal_Light_packaging_for_better_shelf_appeal_and_sustainability.php. Accessed 25 Sept 2011
  61. 61.
    Rosenbloom (2008) Solution, or mess? A milk jug for a green earth. The New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/30/business/30milk.html. Accessed 15 Apr 2011
  62. 62.
    Twede D, Clarke RH, Tait JA (2000) Packaging postponement: a global packaging strategy. Packag Technol Sci 13(3):105–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Sterling S (2007) Transportation: driving sustainable results. Packaging World, Sustainable Outlook. http://www.packworld.com/newsletters/sp-11-14-07.html. Accessed 15 Apr 2011
  64. 64.
    SC Johnson & Son (2008) Doing what’s right: 2008 public report. Racine, WIGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Reynolds P (2002) Superior Likes Caseless Shipping. Packworld. http://www.packworld.com/casestudy-14588. Accessed 15 Apr 2011
  66. 66.
    Singh J, Krasowski A, Singh SP (2010) Life cycle inventory of HDPE bottle-based liquid milk packaging systems. Packag Technol Sci 24(1):49–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Samuelson A, Tilanus B (1997) A framework efficiency model for goods transportation, with an application to regional less-than-truckload distribution. Transport Logistics 1(2):139–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Palmer JM (2005) Level loading and cross docking in a global logistics network. S.M. thesis, Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Department for Transport (2007) Focus on double decks. Freight Best Practice Programme, HMSO, LondonGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    McKinnon AC (2000) Sustainable distribution: opportunities to improve vehicle loading. United Nations Environ Program Ind Environ 23(4):26–30Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of CaliforniaBerkeleyUSA

Personalised recommendations