Biosurfactants pp 135-145 | Cite as

Possibilities and Challenges for Biosurfactants Use in Petroleum Industry

Part of the Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology book series (AEMB, volume 672)


Biosurfactants are a group of microbial molecules identified by their unique capabilities to interact with hydrocarbons. Emulsification and de-emulsification, dispersion, foaming, wetting and coating are some of the numerous surface activities that biosurfactants can achieve when applied within systems such as immiscible liquid/liquid (e.g., oil/water), solid/ liquid (e.g., rock/oil and rock/water) and gas/liquid. Therefore, the possibilities of exploiting these bioproducts in oil-related sciences are vast and made petroleum industry their largest possible market at present. The role of biosurfactants in enhancing oil recovery from reservoirs is certainly the best known; however they can be effectively applied in many other fields from transportation of crude oil in pipeline to the clean-up of oil storage tanks and even manufacturing of fine petrochemicals. When properly used, biosurfactants are comparable to traditional chemical analogues in terms of performances and offer advantages with regard to environment protection/conservation.

This chapter aims at providing an up-to-date overview of biosurfactant roles, applications and possible future uses related to petroleum industry.


Petroleum Industry Diesel Emulsion 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Hall C, Tharakan P, Hallock J et al. Hydrocarbons and the evolution of human culture. Nature 2003; 426:318–322.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kanicky JR, Lopez-Montilla JC, Pandey S et al. Surface chemistry in the petroleum industry. In: Holmberg K, ed. Handbook of Applied Surface and Colloid Chemistry. John Wiley and Sons Ltd, 2001:251–267.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Desai J, Banat IM. Microbial production of surfactants and their commercial potential. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 1997; 61:47–64.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Banat IM, Makkar RS, Cameotra SS. Potential commercial applications of microbial surfactants. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2000; 53:495–508.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Van Hamme JD, Singh A, Ward OP. Physiological aspects. Part 1 in a series of papers devoted to surfactants in microbiology and biotechnology. Biotechnol Adv 2006; 24:604–620.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Singh A, Van Hamme JD, Ward OP. Surfactants in microbiology and biotechnology: Part 2. Application aspects. Biotechnol Adv 2007; 25:99–121.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Planckaert M. Oil reservoirs and oil production. In: Ollivier B, Magot M, eds. Petroleum Microbiology. Washington DC: ASM Press, 2005:3–19.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Van Hamme JD, Singh A, Ward OP. Recent advances in petroleum microbiology. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 2003; 67:503–549.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jenneman GE, McInerney MJ, Knapp RM et al. A halotolerant, biosurfactant-producing bacillus species potentially useful for enhanced oil recovery. Dev Ind Microbiol 1983; 24:485–492.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Folmsbee M, Duncan K, Han SO et al. Re-identification of the halotolerant, biosurfactant-producing bacillus licheniformis strain JF-2 as Bacillus mojavensis JF-2. Syst Appl Microbiol 2006; 29:645–649.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    McInerney MJ, Javaheri M, Nagle DP Jr. Properties of the biosurfactant produced by bacillus licheniformis strain JF-2. J Ind Microbiol 1990; 5:95–101.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    McInerney MJ, Maudgalya SK, Knapp R et al. Development of biosurfactant-mediated oil recovery in model porous systems and computer simulations of biosurfactant-mediated oil recovery. Topical report accessed January 2008 from Scholar
  13. 13.
    Daoshan L, Shouliang L, Yi L et al. The effect of biosurfactant on the interfacial tension and adsorption loss of surfactant in ASP flooding. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochem Eng Aspects 2004; 244:53–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gutnick D, Rosenberg E, Belsky I et al. Ψ-emulsans. US Patent 4,380,504 1983.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Magot M. Indigenous microbial communities in oil fields. In: Ollivier B, Magot M, eds. Petroleum Microbiology. Washington DC: ASM Press, 2005:21–33.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Javaheri M, Jenneman GE, McInerney MJ et al. Anaerobic production of a biosurfactant by bacillus licheniformis JF-2. Appl Environ Microbiol 1985; 50:698–700.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    McInerney MJ, Jenneman GE, Knapp RM et al. Biosurfactant and enhanced oil recovery. US Patent 4,522,261, 1985Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bryant RS. crobial enhanced oil recovery and compositions therefor. US Patent 4,905,761, 1990.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bryant RS, Burchfield TE, Dennis DM et al. Microbial-enhanced waterflooding: Mink unit project. SPE Reservoir Eng 1990; 5:9–13.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bryant RS, Stepp AK, Bertus KM et al. Microbial-enhanced waterflooding field pilots. Dev Petrol Sci 1993; 39:289–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Rocha C, San-Blas F, San-Blas G et al. Biosurfactant production by two isolates of pseudomonas aeruginosa. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 1992; 8:125–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Li Q, Kang C, Wang H et al. Application of microbial enhanced oil recovery technique to daqing oilfield. Biochem Eng J 2002; 11:197–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Cabrera-Valladares N, Richardson AP, Olvera C et al. Monorhamnolipids and 3-(3-hydroxyalkanoylo xy)alkanoic acids (HAAs) production using escherichia coli as a heterologous host. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2006; 73:187–194.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ochsner UA, Koch AK, Fiechter A et al. Isolation and characterization of a regulatory gene affecting rhamnolipid biosurfactant synthesis in pseudomonas aeruginosa. J Bacteriol 1994; 176:2044–2054.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Wang Q, Fang X, Bai B et al. Engineering bacteria for production of rhamnolipid as an agent for enhanced oil recovery. Biotechnol Bioeng 2007; 98:842–853.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Denger K, Warthmann R, Ludwig W et al. Anaerophaga thermohalophila gen nov, sp nov, a moderately thermohalophilic, strictly anaerobic fermentative bacterium. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2002; 52:173–178.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Lal B, Reddy MRV, Agnihotri A et al. ocess for enhanced recovery of crude oil from oil wells using novel microbial consortium. US Patent 20070092930, 2007.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Youssef N, Simpson DR, Duncan KE et al. In situ biosurfactant production by bacillus strains injected into a limestone petroleum reservoir. Appl Environ Microbiol 2007; 73:1239–1247.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Banat IM. Biosurfactant production and possible uses in microbial enhanced oil recovery and oil pollution remediation-a review. Bioresour Technol 1995; 51:1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Bryant R. Potential use of microorganisms in petroleum recovery technology. Proc Okla Acad Sci 1987; 67:97–104.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    McInerney MJ, Nagle DP, Knapp RM. Microbially enhanced oil recovery: past, present and future. In: Ollivier B, Magot M, eds. Petroleum Microbiology. Washington DC: ASM Press, 2005:215–237.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Gutnick DL, Shabtai Y. Exopolysaccharide bioemulsifiers. In: Kosaric N, Cairns WL, Gray NCC, eds. Biosurfactants and Biotechnology. New York: Marcel Dekker Inc, 1987:211–246.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Hayes ME, Hrebenar KR, Murphy PL et al. Bioemulsifier-stabilized hydrocarbosols. US Patent 4,943,390, 1990.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Hayes ME, Hrebenar KR, Murphy PL et al. Combustion of viscous hydrocarbons. US Patent 4,684,372, 1987.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Rocha CA, Gonzalez D, Iturralde ML et al. Production of oily emulsions mediated by microbial tenso-active agent. US Patent 6,060,287, 2000.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Etoumi A. Microbial treatment of waxy crude oils for mitigation of wax precipitation. J Pet Sci Eng 2007; 55:111–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Lazar I, Voicu A, Nicolescu C et al. The use of naturally occurring selectively isolated bacteria for inhibiting paraffin deposition. J Pet Sci Eng 1999; 22:161–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Gutnick D, Rosenberg E. Cleaning oil-contaminated vessels with α-emulsans. US Patent 4,276,094, 1981.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Banat IM, Samarath N, Murad M et al. Biosurfactant production and use in oil tank clean-up. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 1991; 7:80–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Pesce L. A biotechnological method for the regeneration of hydrocarbons from dregs and muds, on the basis of biosurfactants. European Patent EP1427547, 2004.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Clark RH, Morley C, Stevenson PA. Diesel fuel compositions. US Patent 7,229,481, 2007.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Lif A, Holmberg K. Water-in-diesel emulsions and related systems. Adv Colloid Interface Sci 2006; 123–126:231–239.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Landes Bioscience and Springer Science+Business Media 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Amedea Perfumo
    • 1
  • Ivo Rancich
    • 2
  • Ibrahim M. Banat
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Biomedical SciencesUniversity of UlsterColeraine, County LondonderryNorthern Ireland, UK
  2. 2.Idrabel Italia S.r.L.GenoaItaly

Personalised recommendations