Abstract
The functions of a gene are traditionally annotated textually using either free text (Gene Reference Into Function or GeneRIF) or controlled vocabularies (e.g., Gene Ontology or Disease Ontology). Inspired by the latest word cloud tools developed by the Information Visualization Group at IBM Research, we have prototyped a visual system for capturing gene annotations, which we named Gene Graph Into Function or GeneGIF. Fully developing the GeneGIF system would be a significant effort. To justify the necessity and to specify the design requirements of GeneGIF, we first surveyed the end-user preferences. From 53 responses, we found that a majority (64%, p < 0.05) of the users were either positive or neutral toward using GeneGIF in their daily work (acceptance); in terms of preference, a slight majority (51%, p > 0.05) of the users favored visual presentation of information (GeneGIF) compared to textual (GeneRIF) information. The results of this study indicate that a visual presentation tool, such as GeneGIF, can complement standard textual presentation of gene annotations. Moreover, the survey participants provided many constructive comments that will specify the development of a phase-two project (http://128.248.174.241/) to visually annotate each gene in the human genome.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ashburner, M., C. A. Ball, et al. (2000). “Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. The Gene Ontology Consortium.” Nature Genetics 25(1): 25–9.
Childers, T. L., M. J. Houston, et al. (1985). “Measurement of individual-differences in visual versus verbal information-processing.” Journal of Consumer Research 12(2): 125–134.
Harris, M. A., J. Clark, et al. (2004). “The Gene Ontology (GO) database and informatics resource.” Nucleic Acids Research 32(Database issue): D258–61.
Maglott, D., J. Ostell, et al. (2007). “Entrez Gene: gene-centered information at NCBI.” Nucleic Acids Research 35(Database issue): D26–31.
Osborne, J. D., J. Flatow, et al. (2009). “Annotating the human genome with disease ontology.” BMC Genomics 10(Suppl 1):S6.
Osborne, J. D., S. Lin, et al. (2007). “Other riffs on cooperation are already showing how well a wiki could work.” Nature 446(7138): 856.
Plass, J. L., D. M. Chun, et al. (1998). “Supporting visual and verbal learning preferences in a second-language multimedia learning environment.” Journal of Educational Psychology 90(1): 25–36.
Weiss, S. M. (2005). Text mining : predictive methods for analyzing unstructured information. New York, Springer.
Willett, P. (2006). “The Porter stemming algorithm: then and now.” Program-Electronic Library and Information Systems 40(3): 219–223.
Wyer, R. S., Y. W. Jiang, et al. (2008). “Visual and verbal information processing in a consumer context: Further considerations.” Journal of Consumer Psychology 18(4): 276–280.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank Martin Wattenberg, Matthew M Mckeon, and Jonathan Feinberg at IBM Research for helpful discussion of Wordle and comments on this manuscript. The authors would also like to thank Rhett Sutphin at NUCATS for exploring the application programing interface to Wordle.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this paper
Cite this paper
Desai, J. et al. (2010). Visual Presentation as a Welcome Alternative to Textual Presentation of Gene Annotation Information. In: Arabnia, H. (eds) Advances in Computational Biology. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, vol 680. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-5913-3_79
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-5913-3_79
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-5912-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-5913-3
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)