Fallopian Tube Recanalization

  • Elizabeth Ann Ignacio
  • Taara Sultaana Hassan
  • John C. Lipman
  • Farhang Adabi


With infertility prevalence data ranging from 7% to 20% in the United States, reproductive assistance methods are an important medical concern [1, 2]. In working up the infertile couple, practitioners must exclude anatomic causes. When proper work-up and imaging reveal a proximal fallopian tube occlusion, recanalization is a reasonably straightforward and low-risk procedure that can be beneficial to these patients.


Fallopian Tube Ectopic Pregnancy Cervical Dilator Tubal Pregnancy Cervical Stenosis 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    National Survey of Family Growth: Infertility. Centers for Disease Control. Atlanta, GA. December 2002. Accessed July 15, 2010.
  2. 2.
    Boivin J, Bunting L, Collins JA, Nygren KG. International estimates of infertility prevalence and treatment-seeking: potential need and demand for infertility medical care. Hum Reprod. 2007;22(6):1506–12.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Thurmond AS. Selective salpingography and fallopian tube recanalization. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1991;156(1):33–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Novy MJ, Thurmond AS, Patton P, Uchida BT, Rosch J. Diagnosis of cornual obstruction by transcervical fallopian tube cannulation. Fertil Steril. 1988;50(3):434–40.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Verma A, Krarup K, Donuru A. Selective salpingography and fallopian tube catheterisation by guidewire. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2009;29(4):315–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hayashi M, Hoshimoto K, Ohkura T. Successful conception following fallopian tube recanalization in infertile patients with a unilateral proximally occluded tube and a contralateral patent tube. Hum Reprod. 2003;18(1):96–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Thurmond AS, Thurmond AS, Machan L, Maubon AJ, et al. A review of selective salpingography and fallopian tube recanalization. Radiographics. 2000;20:1759–68.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Al-Jaroudi D, Herba MJ, Tulandi T. Reproductive performance after selective tubal catheterization. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2005;12(2):150–2.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lang EK, Dunaway Jr HE. Efficacy of salpingography and transcervical recanalization in diagnosis, categorization, and treatment of fallopian tube obstruction. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2000;23(6):417–22.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Thurmond AS. Selective salpingography and fallopian tube recanalization. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1991;156(1):33–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Golan A, Tur-Kaspa I. The management of the infertile patient with proximal tubal occlusion. Hum Reprod. 1996;11(9):1833–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kosseim M, Brunham RC. Fallopian tube obstruction as a sequela to Chlamydia trachomatis infection. Eur J Clin Microbiol. 1986;5(5):584–90.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Saracoglu F, Mungan T, Tanzer F. Salpingitis isthmica nodosa in infertility and ectopic pregnancy. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 1992;34:202–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Thurmond AS, Brandt KR, Gorrill MJ. Tubal obstruction after ligation reversal surgery: results of catheter recanalization. Radiology. 1999;210(3):747–50.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Jenkins CS, Williams SR, Schmidt GE. Salpingitis isthmica nodosa: a review of the literature, discussion of clinical significance, and consideration of patient management. Fertil Steril. 1993;60(4):599–607.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wollcott R. Proximal tubal occlusion: a practical approach. Hum Reprod. 1996;11(9):1831–3.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Evaluating Infertility. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Washington, DC. November 2007. Accessed July 15, 2010.
  18. 18.
    Infertility. American Society of Reproductive Medicine. Birmingham, AL, January 2007. Accessed July 15, 2010.
  19. 19.
    Katz V. Chapter 3: Reproductive anatomy – clinical correlations. In: Katz V, Lobo R, Lentz G, Gershenson D, editors. Comprehensive gynecology. 5th ed. Philadelphia: Mosby; 2007. p. 43–72.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Gray H. The female genital organs. In: Gray H, revised by Lewis W, editors. Anatomy of the human body. 20th ed. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger; 1918; 2000. Accessed August 8, 2010.
  21. 21.
    Kodaman PH, Arici A, Seli E. Evidence-based diagnosis and management of tubal factor infertility. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2004;16(3):221–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    National Collaborating Centre for Women’s and Children’s Health. Fertility: assessment and treatment for people with fertility problems. London: RCOG Press; 2004.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    The Practice Committee for the American Society of Reproductive Medicine. Optimal evaluation of the infertile female. Fertil Steril. 2006;86(5 Suppl 1):S264–7.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Brant W. Genital tract: radiographic imaging and MR. In: Brant W, Helms C, editors. Fundamentals of diagnostic radiology. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins; 2007. p. 909–24.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    ACOG. Practice bulletin no. 104: antibiotic prophylaxis for gynecologic procedures. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;113(5):1180–9.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Pinto AB, Hovsepian DM, Wattanakumtornkul S, Pilgram TK. Pregnancy outcomes after fallopian tube recanalization: oil-based versus water-soluble contrast agents. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2003;14(1):69–74.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Silberzweig JE. Incidence of pain during hysterosalpingography using a balloon catheter. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007;189:W48.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Thurmond AS, Novy M, Uchida BT, Rösch J. Fallopian tube obstruction: selective salpingography and recanalization. Work in progress. Radiology. 1987;163(2):511–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Thurmond AS, Rosch J. Nonsurgical fallopian tube recanalization for treatment of infertility. Radiology. 1990;174:371–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Lang EK, Dunaway HH. Recanalization of obstructed fallopian tube by selective salpingography and transvaginal bougie dilatation: outcome and cost analysis. Fertil Steril. 1996;66(2):210–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Kumpe DA, Zwerdlinger SC, Rothbarth LJ, Durham JD, Albrecht BH. Proximal fallopian tube occlusion: diagnosis and treatment with transcervical fallopian tube catheterization. Radiology. 1990;177(1):183–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Li QY, Zhou XL, Qin HP, Liu R. [Analysis of 1006 cases with selective salpingography and fallopian tube recanalization]. Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2004;39(2):80–2.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Hovsepian DM, Bonn J, Eschelman DJ, Shapiro MJ, Sullivan KL, Gardiner Jr GA. Fallopian tube recanalization in an unrestricted patient population. Radiology. 1994;190(1):137–40.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Papaioannou S, Afnan M, Sharif K. The role of selective salpingography and tubal catheterization in the management of the infertile couple. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2004;16(4):325–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Papaioannou S, Afnan M, Girling AJ, et al. The effect on pregnancy rates of tubal perfusion pressure reductions achieved by guide-wire tubal catheterization. Hum Reprod. 2002;17(8):2174–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Thurmond AS. Pregnancies after selective salpingography and tubal recanalization. Radiology. 1994;190(1):11–3.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Elizabeth Ann Ignacio
    • 1
  • Taara Sultaana Hassan
    • 2
  • John C. Lipman
    • 3
  • Farhang Adabi
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Radiology, Division of Interventional RadiologyThe George Washington University Medical CenterWashingtonUSA
  2. 2.The George Washington University School of MedicineWashingtonUSA
  3. 3.Interventional RadiologyAtlanta Interventional Institute, Emory Adventist HospitalAtlantaUSA

Personalised recommendations