Skip to main content

Method for Validating Breast Compression Models Using Normalised Cross-Correlation

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Abstract

To diagnose and manage breast cancer, X-ray mammography, ultrasound, and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging are used to image the breasts. In this chapter, we present a method for validating finite element (FE) biomechanical models across the entire breast volume. A computational framework was used to generate personalised FE models of the breast to predict the deformations of the breasts under compression. A Fourier-based correlation technique was used to compare localised mismatches between 3D model-warped images and clinical MR images. This technique is illustrated by matching model-simulated compressed images with MR data for a compressed breast phantom and the compressed breasts of two volunteers. The results from this analysis indicate regions of the biomechanical model that do not align well, and thus require improvement. A validated biomechanical image registration tool of this kind will help clinicians to more accurately localise breast cancers, enabling more reliable diagnoses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. World Health Statistics 2008. Breast cancer: mortality and screening. World Health Organization (WHO), Geneva (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Dronkers, D., Hendriks, J., Holland, R., Rosenbusch, G.: The practice of mammography: pathology, technique, interpretation, adjunct modalities. Thieme, Stuttgart (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Rueckert, D., Sonoda, L., Hayes, C., Hill, D., Leach, M., Hawkes, D.: Nonrigid registration using free-form deformations: application to breast MR images. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 18(8), 712–721 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Sivaramakrishna, R.: 3D Breast image registration – a review. Technology in Cancer Research and Treatment, 4(1), 39–48 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Azar, F., Metaxas, D., Schnall, M.: A finite element model of the breast for predicting mechanical deformations during biopsy procedures. In: IEEE Workshop on Mathematical Methods in Biomedical Image Analysis. Los Alamita, CA, pp. 38–45 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Qui, Y., Goldgof, D., Li, L., Sarkar, S., Zhang, Y., Anton, S.: Correspondence recovery in 2-view mammography. In: ISBI 2004. IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: Nano to Macro, Arlington, VA, pp. 197–200 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Tanner, C., Schnabel, J., Hill, D., Hawkes, D., Leach, M., Hose, R.: Factors influencing the accuracy of biomechanical breast models. Medical Physics, 33(6), 1758–1769 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ruiter, N., Stotzka, R., Muller, T., Gemmeke, H., Reichenbach, J., Kaiser, W.: Model-based registration of X-ray mammograms and MR images of the female breast. IEEE Transaction on Nuclear Science, 53(1), 204–211 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Chung, J., Rajagopal, V., Nielsen, P., Nash, M.: Modelling mammographic compression of the breast. In: MICCAI 08. LNCS 5242, pp. 758–765 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Rajagopal, V., Lee, A., Chung, J., Warren, R., Highnam, R., Nash, M., Nielsen, P.: Creating individual-specific biomechanical models of the breast for medical image analysis. Academic Radiology, 15(11), 1425–1436 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Periaswamy, S., Weaver, J., Healy, D., Kostelec, P.: Automated multiscale elastic image registration using correlation. In: SPIE Medical Imaging 3661. pp. 828–838 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lee, A., Rajagopal, V., Chung, J., Bier, P., Nielsen, P., Nash, M.: Biomechanical modelling for breast image registration. In: SPIE Medical Imaging 6918, 69180U-1 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Chung, J.: Modelling mammographic mechanics. PhD Thesis, University of Auckland (2008)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Angela W.C. Lee .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this paper

Cite this paper

Lee, A.W., Rajagopal, V., Chung, JH., Nielsen, P.M., Nash, M.P. (2010). Method for Validating Breast Compression Models Using Normalised Cross-Correlation. In: Miller, K., Nielsen, P. (eds) Computational Biomechanics for Medicine. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-5874-7_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-5874-7_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-5873-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-5874-7

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics