Fetal Imaging of the Chest



Ultrasonography (US) is the screening method of choice for the evaluation of the fetal airway and chest. It is safe, inexpensive and easily performed. Advances in US technique including higher resolution transducers, Doppler and 3D/4D imaging have allowed for improved assessment of the congenital thoracic masses. The assessment of the fetal chest by US, however, is operator dependent and evaluation may be limited due to fetal position, maternal obesity, overlying bone and/or oligohydramnios. Ultrasound evaluation is sensitive in the diagnosis of many prenatal lung lesions but has low specificity. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is an alternative modality that uses no ionizing radiation, has excellent tissue contrast, a large field of view, is not limited by obesity or overlying bone and can image the fetus in multiple planes regardless of fetal lie. Faster scanning techniques allow studies to be performed without sedation in the second and third trimester with minimal motion artifact. Fetal MRI helps confirm the presence of masses identified by US, can delineate anatomy such as the trachea not visualized by US and may demonstrate additional subtle anomalies. Advances in US and MRI have improved our ability to accurately diagnose fetal airway and chest anomalies and furthered our understanding of the evolution of fetal lung lesions.


Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia Pulmonary Hypoplasia Lung Masse Fetal Magnetic Resonance Image 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    Kline-Fath BM. Is prenatal sonography accurate in identification of Congenital lung lesions? Scientific paper presented at SPR, Boston, MA. April 15; 2010.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Breysem L, Bosmans H, Dymarkowski S, et al. The value of fast MR imaging as an adjunct to ultrasound in prenatal diagnosis. Eur Radiol. 2003;13:1538–48.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Quinn TM, Hubbard AM, Adzick NS. Prenatal MRI enhance fetal diagnosis. J Pediatr Surg. 1998;33:553–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bulas DI. Fetal magnetic resonance imaging as a complement to fetal ultrasonography. Ultrasound Q. 2007;23(1):3–22.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Aite L, Zaccara A, Trucchi A, et al. When uncertainty generates more anxiety than severity: the prenatal experience with cystic adenomatoid malformation of the lung. J Perinat Med. 2009;37:539–42.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ruano R, Joubin L, Abry MC, et al. Anomogram of fetal lung volumes estimated by 3D US using the roataional technique (virtual organ computer aided analysis). J Ultrasound Med. 2006;35:701–9.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Harmath A, Csaba A, Hauzman E, et al. Congenital lung malformations in the second trimester: prenatal ultrasound diagnosis and pathologic findings. J Clin Ultrasound. 2007;35(5):250–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lecompte B, Hadden H, Coste K, et al. Hyperechoic congenital lung lesions in a non-selected population: from prenatal detection till perinatal management. Prenat Diagn. 2009;29:1222–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ankerman T, Oppermann HC, Engler S, et al. Congenital masses of the lung, cystic adenomatoid malformation versus congenital lobar emphysema: prenatal diagnosis and implications for postnatal treatment. J Ultrasound Med. 2004;23:1379–84.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Johnson AM, Hubbard AM. Congenital anomalies of the fetal/neonatal chest. Semin Roentgenol. 2004;39:197–214.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Coakley FV, Glenn OA, Qayyam A, et al. Fetal MRI: a developing technique for the developing patient. AJR. 2004;182:243–52.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Prayer D, Brugger PC, Prayer L. Fetal MRI: techniques and protocols. Pediatr Radiol. 2004;34:685–93.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Baker PN, Johnson IR, Harvey PR, et al. A three year follow up children imaged in utero with echoplanar magnetic resonance. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994;170:32–3.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    De Wilde JP, Rivers AW, Price DU, et al. A review of the current use of magnetic resonance imaging in pregnancy and safety implications for the fetus. Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 2005;87:335.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Yip YP, Capriotti C, Tlagala SL, et al. Effects of MR exposure at 1.5 T on early embryonic development of the chick. J Magn Reson Imaging. 1994;4:742–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Yip YP, Capriotti C, Yip JW. Effects of MR exposure on axonal outgrowth in the sympathetic nervous system of the chick. J Magn Reson Imaging. 1995;5:457–62.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Vadeyar SH, Moore RJ, Strachan BK, et al. Effect of fetal magnetic resonance imaging on fetal heart rate patterns. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000;182:666–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mevissen M, Buntenkotter S, Loscher W. Effect of static and time varying magnetic field on reproduction and fetal development in rats. Teratology. 1994;50:229–37.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Shellock FG, Kanal E. Policies, guidelines and recommendations for MR imaging safety and patient management. JMRI. 1991;1:97–101.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    United Nations Scientific Committee on the effects of atomic radiation. Ionizing radiation levels and effects. 1972 report to the General Assembly Vol 2 Effects New York, NY; 1972Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hand JW, Li Y, Thomas EL, et al. Prediction of specific absorption rate in mother and fetus associated with MRI examinations during pregnancy. Magn Reson Med. 2006;55:883–93.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Frates MC, Kumar AJ, Benson CB, et al. Fetal anomalies: comparison of MR imaging and US for diagnosis. Radiology. 2004;232:398–404.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Levine D, Barnewolt CE, Mehta TS, et al. Fetal thoracic abnormalities: MR imaging. Radiology. 2003;228:379–88.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kunisaki SM, Fauza DO, Barnewolt CE, et al. Exutero intrapartum treatment with placement of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for fetal thoracic masses. J Pediatr Surg. 2007;42(2):420–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Daltro P, Werner H, Gasparetto TD, et al. Congenital chest malformations: a multimodality approach with emphasis on fetal MR Imaging. Radiographics. 2010;30:385–95.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Curran PF, Jelin EB, Rand L, et al. Prenatal steroids for microcystic congenital cystic adenomatoid malformations. J Pediatr Surg. 2010;45:145–50.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Azizkhan RG, Crombleholme TM. Congenital cystic lung disease: contemporary antenatal and postnatal management. Pediatr Surg Int. 2008;24:643–57.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Adzick NS. Management of fetal lung lesions. Clin Perinatol. 2009;36:363–76.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Kumar AN. Perinatal management of common neonatal thoracic lesions. Indian J Pediatr. 2008;75:931–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Bush A, Hogg J, Chitty LS. Cystic lung lesions – prenatal diagnosis and management. Prenat Diagn. 2008;28:604–11.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Cavoretto P, Molina F, Poggi S, et al. Prenatal diagnosis and outcome of echogenic fetal lung lesions. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2008;32:769–83.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Stocker TJ, Manewell JE, Drake RM. Congenital cystic adenomatoid malformation of the lung: classification and morphologic spectrum. Hum Pathol. 1977;8:155–71.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Crombleholme TM, Coleman B, Hedrick H, et al. Cystic adenomatoid malformation volume ratio predicts outcome in prenatally diagnosed cystic adenomatoid malformation of the lung. J Pediatr Surg. 2002;37(3):331–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Mann S, Wilson RD, Bebbington MW, et al. Antenatal diagnosis and management of congenital cystic adenomatoid malformation. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2007;12:477–81.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Coleman BG, Adzick NS, Crombleholme TM, et al. Fetal therapy: state of the art. J Ultrasound Med. 2002;21:1257–88.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Morris LM, Lim FY, Livingston JC, et al. High-risk fetal congenital pulmonary airway malformations have a variable response to steroids. J Pediatr Surg. 2009;2004:60–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Kunisaki SM, Barnewolt CE, Estroff JA, et al. Large fetal congenital cystic adenomatoid malformations: growth trends and patient survival. J Pediatr Surg. 2007;42(2):404–10.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Knox EM, Kilby MD, Martin WL, et al. In-utero pulmonary drainage in the management of primary hydrothorax and congenital cystic lung lesion: a systematic review. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2006;28:726–34.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Fortunato S, Lombardo S, Dantrell J. Intrauterine laser ablation of a fetal cystic adenomatoid malformation with hydrops: the application of minimally invasive surgical techniques to fetal surgery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997;177:S84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Adzick NS. Open fetal surgery for life-threatening fetal anomalies. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2009; (epub ahead of print).Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Bermudez C, Perez-Wulff J, Arcadipane M, et al. Percutaneous fetal sclerotherapy for congenital cystic adenomatoid malformation of the lung. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2008;24:237–40.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Marshall KW, Blane CE, Teitelbaum DH, et al. Congenital cystic adenomatoid malformation: impact of prenatal diagnosis and changing strategies in the treatment of the asymptomatic patient. AJR. 2000;175:1551–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Vijayaraghavan SB, Rao PS, Selvarasu CD, et al. Prenatal sonographic features of intralobar bronchopulmonary sequestration. J Ultrasound Med. 2003;22:541–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Sepulveda W. Perinatal imaging in bronchopulmonary sequestration. J Ultrasound Med. 2009;28:89–94.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Zeidan S, Gorincour G, Potier A, et al. Congenital lung malformation: evaluation of prenatal and postnatal radiologic findings. Respirology. 2009;14:1005–11.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Witlox RS, Lopriore E, Rikkers-Mutsaerts ER, et al. Single-needle laser treatment with drainage of hydrothorax in fetal bronchopulmonary sequestration with hydrops. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009;34:355–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Oepkes D, Devlieger R, Lopriore E, et al. Successful ultrasound-guided laser treatment of fetal hydrops caused by pulmonary sequestration. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2007;29:457–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Ruano R, de A Pimenta EJ, Marques da Silva M, et al. Percutaneous intrauterine laser ablation of the abnormal vessel in pulmonary sequestration with hydrops at 29 weeks’ gestation. J Ultrasound Med. 2007;26:1235–41.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Becmeur F, Horta-Geraud P, Donato L, et al. Pulmonary sequestrations: prenatal ultrasound diagnosis, treatment and outcome. J Pediatr Surg. 1998;33:492–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Seo T, Ando H, Kaneko K, et al. Two cases of prenatally diagnosed congenital lobar emphysema caused by lobar bronchial atresia. J Pediatr Surg. 2006;41:E17–20.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Pariente G, Aviram M, Landau D, et al. Prenatal diagnosis of congenital lobar emphysema: case report and review of the literature. J Ultrasound Med. 2009;28:1081–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Peranteau WH, Merchant AM, Hedrick HL, et al. Prenatal Course and postnatal management of peripheral bronchial atresia: association with congenital cystic adenomatoid malformation of the lung. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2008;24:190–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Aubard Y, Derouineau I, Aubard V, et al. Primary fetal hydrothorax: a literature review and proposed antenatal clinical strategy. Fetal Diagn Ther. 1998;13:325–33.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Chaoui R, Kalache K, Tennstedt C, et al. Pulmonary arterial Doppler velocimetry in fetuses with lung hypoplasia. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Repord Biol. 1999;84:179–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Keller TM, Rake A, Michel SC, Seifert B, et al. MR assessment of fetal lung development using lung volumes and signal intensities. Eur Radiol. 2004;14(6):984–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Osada H, Kaku K, Masuda K, Iitsuka Y, Seki K, Sekiya S. Quantitative and qualitative evaluations of fetal lung with MR imaging. Radiology. 2004;231:887–92.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Tanigaki S, Miyakoshi K, Tanaka M, et al. Pulmonary hypoplasia: prediction with use of ratio of MRI measured fetal lung volume to US estimated fetal body weight. Radiology. 2004;232:767–72.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Ward VL, Nishino M, Hatabu H, et al. Fetal lung volume measurements: determination with MR imaging – effect of various factors. Radiology. 2006;240(1):187–93.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Williams G, Coakley FV, Qayyum A, et al. Fetal relative lung volume: quantification by using prenatal MR imaging lung volumetry. Radiology. 2004;233:457–62.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Keller TM, Rake A, Michel SC, Seifert B, Wisser J, et al. MR assessment of fetal lung development using lung volumes and signal intensities. Eur Radiol. 2004;14(6):984–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Kuwashima S, Nishimura G, Limura F, et al. Low intensity fetal lungs on MRI may suggest the diagnosis of pulmonary hypoplasia. Pediatr Radiol. 2001;31:669–72.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Zaretsky M, Ramus R, McIntire D, et al. MR calculation of lung volumes to predict outcome in fetuses with genitourinary abnormalities. Am J Roentgenol. 2005;185(5):1328–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Diagnostic Imaging and RadiologyGeorge Washington University Medical Center, Children’s National Medical CenterWashingtonUSA
  2. 2.Department of Radiology, Pediatric RadiologistChildren’s National Medical CenterWashingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations