Percutaneous Biopsies in Children

  • Krijn P. van Lienden
  • Rick R. van Rijn


According to the Society of Interventional Radiology Standards of Practice Committee, image-guided percutaneous biopsy is defined as placement of a needle or needles into a suspected abnormal target site for the purpose of obtaining tissue or cells for diagnosis (J Vasc Interv Radiol 21(7):969–975, 2010). In contrast to the adult clinical setting, image-guided biopsies in the pediatric population have not yet reached a full level of acceptance (Radiology 256(3):751–758, 2010). One of the main differences is the need for general sedation in most of the patients, this as childhood oncology has a peak in the young pediatric population. Of all cases of childhood cancer under the age of 15 years, approximately 50 % are diagnosed below the age of 5 years (Cancer in children: clinical management, New York, pp. 1–16). In children, in contrast to adults, hematological malignancies and tumors of the central nervous system account for the majority of all cancers.


Fine Needle Aspiration Core Needle Biopsy Surgical Biopsy Percutaneous Biopsy Preprocedural Imaging 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    Gupta S, Wallace MJ, Cardella JF, Kundu S, Miller DL, Rose SC. Quality improvement guidelines for percutaneous needle biopsy. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2010;21(7):969–75.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kwan SW, Bhargavan M, Kerlan Jr RK, Sunshine JH. Effect of advanced imaging technology on how biopsies are done and who does them. Radiology. 2010; 256(3):751–8.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Stiller CA, Draper GJ. The epidemiology of cancer in children. In: Voute PA, Barrett A, Stevens MCG, Caron HN, editors. Cancer in children: clinical management. 5th ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2005. p. 1–16.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sebire NJ, Roebuck DJ. Pathological diagnosis of pediatric tumours from image-guided needle core biopsies: a systematic review. Pediatr Radiol. 2006; 36(5):426–31.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chowdhury T, Barnacle A, Haque S, et al. Ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy for the diagnosis of rhabdomyosarcoma in childhood. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2009;53(3):356–60.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    ACR–SIR–SPR practice guideline for the performance of image-guided percutaneous needle biopsy (PNB) (2013) date accessed 10-2-14.
  7. 7.
    Atwell TD, Smith RL, Hesley GK, et al. Incidence of bleeding after 15,181 percutaneous biopsies and the role of aspirin. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010;194(3): 784–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Murphy FB, Barefield KP, Steinberg HV, Bernardino ME. CT- or sonography-guided biopsy of the liver in the presence of ascites: frequency of complications. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1988;151(3):485–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Little AF, Ferris JV, Dodd III GD, Baron RL. Image-guided percutaneous hepatic biopsy: effect of ascites on the complication rate. Radiology. 1996;199(1): 79–83.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Health and Public Policy Committee. Clinical competence in percutaneous renal biopsy. American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med. 1988;108(2):301–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wickre CG, Golper TA. Complications of percutaneous needle biopsy of the kidney. Am J Nephrol. 1982;2(4):173–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wiebe S, Cohen J, Connolly B, Chait P. Percutaneous decompression of the bowel with a small-caliber needle: a method to facilitate percutaneous abdominal access. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005;184(1):227–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Keeling AN, Reekers JA, Lee MJ. The clinical practice of interventional radiology: a European perspective. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2009;32(3):406–11.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Shlomovitz E, Amaral JG, Chait PG. Image-guided therapy and minimally invasive surgery in children: a merging future. Pediatr Radiol. 2006;36(5):398–404.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ward ST, Shepherd JA, Khalil H. Freehand versus ultrasound-guided core biopsies of the breast: reducing the burden of repeat biopsies in patients presenting to the breast clinic. Breast. 2010;19(2):105–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hatada T, Ishii H, Ichii S, Okada K, Yamamura T. Ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy for breast tumors: needle guide versus freehand technique. Tumori. 1999;85(1):12–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Phal PM, Brooks DM, Wolfe R. Sonographically guided biopsy of focal lesions: a comparison of freehand and probe-guided techniques using a phantom. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005;184(5):1652–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Brenner DJ, Elliston CD, Hall EJ, Berdon WE. Estimated risks of radiation induced fatal cancer from pediatric CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001;176: 289–96.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Schulz T, Trobs RB, Schneider JP, Hirsch W, Schmidt F, Kahn T. MR imaging-guided percutaneous procedures in children. Acad Radiol. 2005;12(9): 1128–34.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Schulz T, Trobs RB, Schneider JP, et al. Pediatric MR-guided interventions. Eur J Radiol. 2005;53(1): 57–66.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kuhn JP, Langner S, Hegenscheid K, et al. Magnetic resonance-guided upper abdominal biopsies in a high-field wide-bore 3-T MRI system: feasibility, handling, and needle artefacts. Eur Radiol. 2010;20(10): 2414–21.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Zangos S, Muller C, Mayer F, et al. [Retrospective 5-year analysis of MR-guided biopsies in a low-field MR system]. Rofo. 2009;181(7):658–63.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Schenck JF. The role of magnetic susceptibility in magnetic resonance imaging: MRI magnetic compatibility of the first and second kinds. Med Phys. 1996;23(6):815–50.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Lindh V, Wiklund U, Hakansson S. Assessment of the effect of EMLA during venipuncture in the newborn by analysis of heart rate variability. Pain. 2000;86(3): 247–54.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kapelushnik J, Koren G, Solh H, Greenberg M, DeVeber L. Evaluating the efficacy of EMLA in alleviating pain associated with lumbar puncture; comparison of open and double-blinded protocols in children. Pain. 1990;42(1):31–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Lurngnateetape A, Tritrakarn T. Placebo effect of eutectic mixture of lidocaine and prilocaine (EMLA) cream in reducing venepuncture pain in children. Ann Acad Med Singapore. 1994;23(4):465–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Nobili V, Comparcola D, Sartorelli MR, et al. Blind and ultrasound-guided percutaneous liver biopsy in children. Pediatr Radiol. 2003;33(11):772–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Hoffer FA. Liver biopsy methods for pediatric oncology patients. Pediatr Radiol. 2000;30(7):481–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Muraca S, Chait PG, Connolly BL, Baskin KM, Temple MJ. US-guided core biopsy of the spleen in children. Radiology. 2001;218:200–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Lachar WA, Shahab I, Saad J. Accuracy and cost-effectiveness of core needle biopsy in the evaluation of suspected lymphoma: a study of 101 cases. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2007;131:1033–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Kaye RD, Towbin RB. Imaging and intervention in the gastrointestinal tract in children. Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 2002;31(3):897–923.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Riddle C, Ahmed B, Doyle J, Connolly BL. Migration of Gelfoam to the gallbladder after liver biopsy. Pediatr Radiol. 2008;38(7):806–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Mammen T, Keshava SN, Eapen CE, et al. Transjugular liver biopsy: a retrospective analysis of 601 cases. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2008;19(3):351–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Salla C, Chatzipantelis P, Konstantinou P, Karoumpalis I, Pantazopoulou A, Dappola V. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration cytology diagnosis of solid pseudopapillary tumor of the pancreas: a case report and literature review. World J Gastroenterol. 2007;13(38):5158–68.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Muller MF, Meyerberger C, Bertschinger P, Schaer R, Marincek B. Pancreatic tumors: evaluation with endoscopic US, CT, and MR imaging. Radiology. 1994;190:745–51.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Tam A, Krishnamurthy S, Pilsbury EP, et al. Percutaneous image-guided splenic biopsy in the oncology patient: an audit of 156 consecutive cases. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2008;19:80–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Liang P, Gao Y, Wang Y, Yu X, Yu D, Dong B. US-guided percutaneous needle biopsy of the spleen using 18-gauge versus 21-gauge needles. J Clin Ultrasound. 2007;35(9):477–82.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Maya ID, Maddela P, Barker J, Allon M. Percutaneous renal biopsy: comparison of blind and real-time ultrasound-guided technique. Semin Dial. 2007;20(4): 355–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Roebuck DJ. Genitourinary intervention in children. Pediatr Radiol. 2011;41(1):17–26.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Vujanic GM, Kelsey A, Mitchell C, Shannon RS, Gornall P. The role of biopsy in the diagnosis of renal tumors of childhood: results of the UKCCSG Wilms tumor study 3. Med Pediatr Oncol. 2003;40(1): 18–22.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    See TC, Thompson BC, Howie AJ, et al. Transjugular renal biopsy: our experience and technical considerations. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2008;31(5): 906–18.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Riccabona M, Schwinger W, Ring E. Arteriovenous fistula after renal biopsy in children. J Ultrasound Med. 1998;17(8):505–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Hergesell O, Felten H, Andrassy K, Kuhn K, Ritz E. Safety of ultrasound-guided percutaneous renal biopsy-retrospective analysis of 1090 consecutive cases. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 1998;13(4):975–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Sinha MD, Lewis MA, Bradbury MG, Webb NJ. Percutaneous real-time ultrasound-guided renal biopsy by automated biopsy gun in children: safety and complications. J Nephrol. 2006;19(1):41–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Ishikawa E, Nomura S, Hamaguchi T, et al. Ultrasonography as a predictor of overt bleeding after renal biopsy. Clin Exp Nephrol. 2009;13(4):325–31.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Waldo B, Korbet SM, Freimanis MG, Lewis EJ. The value of post-biopsy ultrasound in predicting complications after percutaneous renal biopsy of native kidneys. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2009;24(8): 2433–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Novellas S, Chevallier P, Motamedi JP, Kurzenne JY, Berard E, Bruneton JN. Superselective embolization of a post-biopsy renal pseudoaneurysm in a 13-month-old infant. Pediatr Radiol. 2006;36(8):874–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Pappas P, Constantinides C, Leonardou P, et al. Biopsy-related hemorrhage of renal allografts treated by percutaneous superselective segmental renal artery embolization. Transplant Proc. 2006;38(5):1375–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Al MA, Al-Akash S. Safety of percutaneous renal biopsy as an outpatient procedure in pediatric patients. Ann Saudi Med. 2006;26(4):303–5.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Brown KT, Brody LA, Getrajdman GI, Napp TE. Outpatient treatment of iatrogenic pneumothorax after needle biopsy. Radiology. 1997;205(1): 249–52.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Perlmutt LM, Johnston WW, Dunnick NR. Percutaneous transthoracic needle aspiration: a review. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1989;152(3):451–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Liu PT, Valadez SD, Chivers FS, Roberts CC, Beauchamp CP. Anatomically based guidelines for core needle biopsy of bone tumors: implications for limb-sparing surgery. Radiographics. 2007;27(1): 189–205.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Murphy WA, Destouet JM, Gilula LA. Percutaneous skeletal biopsy 1981: a procedure for radiologists—results, review, and recommendations. Radiology. 1981;139(3):545–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Carrasco CH, Wallace S, Richli WR. Percutaneous skeletal biopsy. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 1991; 14(1):69–72.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Rapkiewicz A, Le BT, Simsir A, Cangiarella J, Levine P. Spectrum of head and neck lesions diagnosed by fine-needle aspiration cytology in the pediatric population. Cancer. 2007;111(4):242–51.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Pfeiffer J, Kayser G, Technau-Ihling K, Boedeker CC, Ridder GJ. Ultrasound-guided core-needle biopsy in the diagnosis of head and neck masses: indications, technique and results. Head Neck. 2007;29:1033–40.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Meyer JE, Smith DN, Lester SC, et al. Large-core needle biopsy of nonpalpable breast lesions. JAMA. 1999;281(17):1638–41.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Perini S, Gordon RL, LaBerge JM, et al. Transcatheter embolization of biopsy-related vascular injury in the transplant kidney: immediate and long-term outcome. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 1998;9(6):1011–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Lieu D. Cytopathologist-performed ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration and core-needle biopsy: a prospective study of 500 consecutive cases. Diagn Cytopathol. 2008;36:317–24.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Hall FM. Identification, biopsy, and treatment of poorly understood premalignant, in situ, and indolent low-grade cancers: are we becoming victims of our own success? Radiology. 2010;254:655–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Cardella JF, Bakal CW, Bertino RE, et al. Quality improvement guidelines for image-guided percutaneous biopsy in adults. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2003;14(9 Pt 2):S227–30.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Horner MJ, Ries LAG, Krapcho M, Neyman N, Aminou R, Howlader N, Altekruse SF, Feuer EJ, Huang L, Mariotto A, Miller BA, Lewis DR, Eisner MP, Stinchcomb DG, Edwards BK, editors. SEER cancer statistics review, 1975–2006. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute., based on November 2008 SEER data submission, posted to the SEER web site, 2009.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Radiology, Emma Children’s HospitalAcademic Medical Center AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations