Computed Tomographic Colonography: Image Display Methods
High reader performance (high sensitivity levels with low false-positive rates) and time efficiency are the two main goals sought during interpretation of computed tomographic colonography (CTC) examinations. As CTC continues to grow as a valid screening test for colorectal neoplasia, one concern is that, as currently proposed by most authorities in the field, interpretation of CTC examinations can be perceived as time-consuming and potentially impractical for some radiologists. Thus, it is mandatory that radiologists (and others interpreting the examinations) familiarize themselves with the various paradigms available to display the CT data. In the past decade, vendors and independent researchers have devoted time, effort, and resources to develop image display tools that ease the interpretation of CTC studies.
KeywordsCompute Tomographic Colonography Optical Colonoscopy Pedunculate Polyp Prone Image Virtual Dissection
- 1.Barish MA, Soto JA, Ferrucci JT. Consensus on current clinical practice of virtual colonoscopy. Am J Roentgenol. 2005;184:786–792.Google Scholar
- 2.Royster AP, Fenlon HM, Clarke PD, Nunes DP, Ferrucci JT. CT colonoscopy of colorectal neoplasms: two-dimensional and three-dimensional virtual-reality techniques with colonoscopic correlation. Am J Roentgenol. 1997;169:1237–1242.Google Scholar
- 3.Macari M, Milano A, Lavelle M, Berman P, Megibow AJ. Comparison of time-efficient CT colonography with two- and three-dimensional colonic evaluation for detecting colorectal polyps. Am J Roentgenol. 2000;174:1543–1549.Google Scholar
- 4.Macari M, Megibow AJ. Pitfalls of using three-dimensional CT colonography with two-dimensional imaging correlation. Am J Roentgenol. 2001;176:137–143.Google Scholar
- 32.Hoppe H, Quattropani C, Spreng A, Mattich J, Netzer P, Dinkel HP. Virtual colon dissection with CT colonography compared with axial interpretation and conventional colonoscopy: preliminary results. Am J Roentgenol. 2004;182:1151–1158.Google Scholar