Computer-Aided Diagnosis in Computed Tomographic Colonography

  • Kenji Suzuki
  • Abraham H. Dachman


Computed tomographic colonography (CTC) is gaining acceptance as a method to screen the colon and rectum for polyps and masses, but there is a substantial learning curve [1, 2] and sensitivity remains variable [3]. Computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) has recently been referred to more often as “computer aided detection” and abbreviated CADe as distinct from CADx, which refers to features which differentiate benign from malignant lesions. CADe reflects the fact that the software is not making any histologically specific feature analyses, but only looking for polyp candidates. In this chapter the generic term “CAD” will be used with the understanding that it refers to CADe.


Compute Tomographic Colonography Optical Colonoscopy Quadratic Discriminant Analysis Flat Lesion Observer Performance Study 



The authors thank Ron Summers, Rob Van Uitert, Jeff Hoffmeister, and Ila Sethi for their comments on this chapter.


  1. 1.
    Soto JA, Barish MA, Yee J. Reader training in CT colonography: how much is enough? Radiology. 2005;237:26–27.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dachman AH, Bekeny KA, Zintsmaster M, et al. Formative evaluation of standardized training for CT colonography interpretation by novice readers. Radiology. 2008;249:167–177.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mulhall BP, Veerappan GR, JacksonJL. Meta-analysis: computed tomographic colonography. Ann Intern Med. 2005;142:635–650PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Taylor SA, Halligan S, Slater A, et al. Polyp detection with CT colonography: primary 3D endoluminal analysis versus primary 2D transverse analysis with computer-assisted reader software. Radiology. 2006;239:759–767.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Summers RM, Jerebko AK, Franaszek M, Malley JD, Johnson CD. Colonic polyps: complementary role of computer-aided detection in CT colonography. Radiology. 2002;225:391–399.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bagoni L, Cathier P, Dundar M, et al. Computer-aided detection (CAD) for CT colonography: a tool to address a growing need. Br J Radiol. 2005; Special Issue:S57–S62.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Park SH, Kim SY, Lee SS, et al. Sensitivity of CT colonography for nonpolypoid colorectal lesions interpreted by human readers and with computer-aided detection. Am J Roentgenol. 2009;193:70–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Baker ME, Bogoni L, Obuchowski NA, et al. Computer-aided detection of colorectal polyps: can it improve sensitivity of less-experienced readers? Preliminary findings. Radiology. 2007;245:140–149.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Taylor SA, Brittenden J, Lenton J, et al. Influence of computer-aided detection false-positives on reader performance and diagnostic confidence for CT colonography. Am J Roentgenol. 2009;192:1682–1689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Burling D, Moore A, Marshall M, et al. Virtual colonoscopy: effect of computer-assisted detection (CAD) on radiographer performance. Clin Radiol. 2008;63:549–556.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Petrick N, Haider M, Summers RM, et al. CT colonography with computer-aided detection as a second reader: observer performance study. Radiology. 2008;246:148–156.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Doshi T, Rusinak DJ, Halvorsen B, Rockey DC, Suzuki K, and Dachman AH. Causes of error in CT colonography. Radiology. 2007;244:165–173.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hock D, Ouhadi R, Materne R, et al. Virtual dissection CT colonography: evaluation of learning curves and reading times with and without computer-aided detection. Radiology. 2008;248:860–868.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Taylor SA, Iinuma G, Saito GY, Zhang J, Halligan S. CT colonography: computer-aided detection of morphologically flat T1 colonic carcinoma. Eur Radiol. 2008;18:1666–1673.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Graser A, Kolligs FT, Mang T, et al. Computer-aided detection in CT colonography: initial clinical experience using a prototype system. Eur Radiol. 2007;17:2608–2615.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Johnson KT, Fletcher JG, Johnson CD. Computer-aided detection (CAD) using 360 degree virtual dissection: can CAD in a first reviewer paradigm be a reliable substitute for primary 2D or 3D search? Am J Roentgenol. 2007;189:172–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mang T, Peloschek P, Plank C, et al. Effect of computer-aided detection as a second reader in multidetector-row CT colonography. Eur Radiol. 2007;17:2598–2256.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Halligan S, Altman DG, Mallett S, et al. Computed tomographic colonography: assessment of radiologist performance with and without computer-aided detection. Gastroenterology. 2006;131:1690–1699.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Shi R, Schraedley-Desmond P, Napel S, et al. CT colonography: influence of 3D viewing and polyp candidate features on interpretation with computer-aided detection. Radiology. 2006;239:768–776.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Taylor SA, Halligan S, Burling D, et al. Computer-assisted reader software versus expert reviewers for polyp detection on CT colonography. Am J Roentgenol. 2006;186:696–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Mani A, Napel S, Paik DS, et al. Computed tomography colonography: feasibility of computer-aided polyp detection in a “first reader” paradigm. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2004;28:318–326.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Regge D, Hassan C, Pickhardt PJ, et al. Impact of computer-aided detection on the cost-effectiveness of colonography. Radiology. 2009;250:488–497.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Summers RM. Road maps for advancement of radiologic computer-aided detection in the 21st century. Radiology. 2003;229:11–13.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Yoshida H, Dachman AH. Computer-aided diagnosis for CT colonography. Seminars in Ultrasound, CT and MR. 2004;25:419–431.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Summers RM. Challenges for computer-aided diagnosis for CT colonography. Abdominal Imaging. 2002;27:268–274.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Taylor SA, Charman SC, et al. CT colonography: investigation of the optimum reader paradigm by using computer-aided detection software. Radiology. 2008;246:463–471.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Chan HP, Sahiner B, et al. Improvement of radiologists’ characterization of mammographic masses by using computer-aided diagnosis: an ROC study. Radiology. 1999;212:817–827.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Jiang Y, Nishikawa RM, et al. Potential of computer-aided diagnosis to reduce variability in radiologists’ interpretations of mammograms depicting microcalcifications. Radiology. 2000;220:787–794.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Kobayashi T, Xu XW, et al. Effect of a computer-aided diagnosis scheme on radiologists’ performance in detection of lung nodules on radiographs. Radiology. 1996;199:843–848.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Li F, Aoyama M, et al. Radiologists’ performance for differentiating benign from malignant lung nodules on high-resolution CT using computer-estimated likelihood of malignancy. Am J Roentgenol. 2004;183:1209–1215.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Li F, Arimura H, et al. Computer-aided detection of peripheral lung cancers missed at CT: ROC analyses without and with localization. Radiology. 2005;237:684–690.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Yoshida H, Masutani Y, et al. Computerized detection of colonic polyps at CT colonography on the basis of volumetric features: pilot study. Radiology. 2002;222:327–336.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Nappi J, Yoshida H. Automated detection of polyps with CT colonography: evaluation of volumetric features for reduction of false-positive findings. Acad Radiol. 2002;9:386–397.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Nappi J, Yoshida H. Feature-guided analysis for reduction of false positives in CAD of polyps for computed tomographic colonography. Med Phys 2003;30:1592–1601.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Suzuki K, Yoshida H, et al. Massive-training artificial neural network (MTANN) for reduction of false positives in computer-aided detection of polyps: Suppression of rectal tubes. Med Phys. 2006;33: 3814–3824.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Suzuki K, Yoshida H, et al. Mixture of expert 3D massive-training ANNs for reduction of multiple types of false positives in CAD for detection of polyps in CT colonography. Med Phys. 2008;35:694–703.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Dorai C, Jain A. COSMOS: A representation scheme for 3D free-form objects. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 1997;19:1115–1130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Fukunaga K. Introduction to Statistical Pattern Recognition. San Diego: Academic. 1990.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Summers RM, Johnson CD, et al. Automated polyp detection at CT colonography: feasibility assessment in a human population. Radiology. 2001;219:51–59.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Gokturk SB, Tomasi C, et al. A statistical 3-D pattern processing method for computer-aided detection of polyps in CT colonography. IEEE Trans Med Imag 2001;20:1251–1260.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Kiss G, Van Cleynenbreugel J, et al. Computer-aided diagnosis in virtual colonography via combination of surface normal and sphere fitting methods. Eur Radiol. 2002;12:77–81.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Acar B, Beaulieu CF, et al. Edge displacement field-based classification for improved detection of polyps in CT colonography. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2002;21:1461–1467.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Jerebko AK, Summers RM, et al. Computer-assisted detection of colonic polyps with CT colonography using neural networks and binary classification trees. Med Phys. 2003;30:52–60.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Jerebko AK, Malley JD, et al. Multiple neural network classification scheme for detection of colonic polyps in CT colonography data sets. Acad Radiol. 2003;10:154–160.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Jerebko AK, MalleyJD, et al. Support vector machines committee classification method for computer-aided polyp detection in CT colonography. Acad Radiol. 2005;12:479–486.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Paik DS, Beaulieu CF, et al. Surface normal overlap: a computer-aided detection algorithm with application to colonic polyps and lung nodules in helical CT. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2004;23:661–675.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Nappi, J, Okamura A, et al. Region-based supine-prone correspondence for the reduction of false-positive CAD polyp candidates in CT colonography. Acad Radiol. 2005;12:695–707.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Iordanescu G, Summers RM. Reduction of false positives on the rectal tube in computer-aided detection for CT colonography. Med Phys. 2004;31:2855–2862.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Summers RM, Yao J, et al. CT colonography with computer-aided detection: automated recognition of ileocecal valve to reduce number of false-positive detections. Radiology. 2004;233:266–272.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    O’Connor SD, Summers RM, Yao J, Pickhardt PJ, Choi JR. CT colonography with computer-aided polyp detection: volume and attenuation thresholds to reduce false-positive findings owing to the ileocecal valve. Radiology. 2006; 241:426–432.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Wang Z, Liang Z, et al. Reduction of false positives by internal features for polyp detection in CT-based virtual colonoscopy. Med Phys. 2005;32:3602–3616.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Suzuki K, Armato SG, et al. Massive training artificial neural network (MTANN) for reduction of false positives in computerized detection of lung nodules in low-dose computed tomography. Med Phys. 2003;30:1602–1617.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Suzuki K, Horiba I, et al. Neural edge enhancer for supervised edge enhancement from noisy images. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 2003;25:1582–1596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Suzuki K, Horiba I, et al. Extraction of left ventricular contours from left ventriculograms by means of a neural edge detector. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2004;23:330–339.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Suzuki K, Horiba I, et al. A simple neural network pruning algorithm with application to filter synthesis. Neural Process Lett. 2001;13:43–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Suzuki K. Determining the receptive field of a neural filter. J Neural Eng. 2004;1:228–37.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Egan JP, Greenberg GZ, et al. Operating characteristics, signal detectability, and the method of free response. J Acoust Soc Am. 1961;33:993–1007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Summers RM, Beaulieu CF, et al. Automated polyp detector for CT colonography: feasibility study. Radiology. 2000;216:284–290.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Summers RM, Yao J, et al. Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy computer-aided polyp detection in a screening population. Gastroenterology. 2005;129:1832–1844.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Summers RM, Handwerker LR, Pickhardt PJ, et al. Performance of a previously validated CT colonography computer-aided detection system in a new patient population. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008; 191:168–174.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Kim SH, Lee JM, et al. Computer-aided detection of colonic polyps at CT colonography using a Hessian matrix-based algorithm: preliminary study. Am J Roentgenol. 2007;189:41–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Fletcher JG, Booya F, et al. Comparative performance of two polyp detection systems on CT colonography. Am J Roentgenol. 2007;189:277–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Lee MW, Kim SH, Park, HS, Lee, JG, Joo, SM; An, S, Choi, BI. An anthropomorphic phantom study of computer-aided detection performance for polyp detection on CT colonography: a comparison of commercially and academically available systems. Am J Roentgenol. 2009;193:445–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
  65. 65.
    De Vries AH, Jensch S, Liedenbaum MH, et al. Does a computer-aided detection algorithm in a second read paradigm enhance the performance of experienced computed tomography colonography readers in a population of increased risk? Eur Radiol. 2009;19:941–950.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Dachman AH, Nancy A. Obuchowski NA, Hoffmeister JW, Louis J. Hinshaw LJ, Frew MI, Van Uitert, RL Summers RM, Hillman BJ. Impact of computer aided detection for CT colonography in a multiple-reader, multiple-case trial. Radiology. 2010;256:827–835.Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Rockey DC, Paulson E, et al. Analysis of air contrast barium enema, computed tomographic colonography, and colonoscopy: prospective comparison. Lancet. 2005;365:305–311.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Suzuki K, Rockey DC, et al. CT colonography: computer-aided detection of false-negative polyps in a multicenter clinical trial. Med Phys. 2010;30:2–21.Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Rembacken BJ, Fujii T, et al. Flat and depressed colonic neoplasms: a prospective study of 1000 colonoscopies in the UK. Lancet. 2000;355:1211–1214.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Soetikno R, Friedland S, et al. Nonpolypoid (flat and depressed) colorectal neoplasms. Gastroenterology. 2006;130:566–576.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Kudo S, Kashida H, et al. Early colorectal cancer: flat or depressed type. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2000;15 Suppl: D66–D70.Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    Kudo S, Kashida H, et al. Colonoscopic diagnosis and management of nonpolypoid early colorectal cancer. World J Surg. 2000;24:1081–1090.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Ross AS, Waxman I. Flat and depressed neoplasms of the colon in Western populations. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;101:172–180.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Soetikno RM, Kaltenbach T, et al. Prevalence of nonpolypoid (flat and depressed) colorectal neoplasms in asymptomatic and symptomatic adults. JAMA. 2008;299: 1027–1035.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Fujii T, Rembacken BJ, et al. Flat adenomas in the United Kingdom: are treatable cancers being missed? Endoscopy. 1998;30:437–443.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Johnson CD, Chen MH, et al. Accuracy of CT colonography for detection of large adenomas and cancers. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:1207–1217.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Fidler JL, Johnson CD, et al. Detection of flat lesions in the colon with CT colonography. Abdom Imaging. 2002;27:292–300.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Fidler J, Johnson C. Flat polyps of the colon: accuracy of detection by CT colonography and histologic significance. Abdom Imaging. 2009;34:157–171.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Taylor SA, Suzuki N, et al. Flat neoplasia of the colon: CT colonography with CAD. Abdom Imaging. 2009;34:173–181.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Lostumbo A, Wanamaker C, et al. Comparison of 2D and 3D views for evaluation of flat lesions in CT colonography. Acad Radiol. 2010;7:39–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Lostumbo A, Suzuki K, Dachman AH. Flat lesions in CT colonography. Abdom Imaging. 2009 (epub ahead of print).Google Scholar
  82. 82.
    Taylor SA, Greenhalgh R, Ilangovan R, et al. CT colonography and computer-aided detection: effect of false-positive results on reader specificity and reading efficiency in a low-prevalence screening population. Radiology. 2008; 247:133–140.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Taylor SA, Robinson C, Boone D, Honeyfield L, Halligan S. Polyp characteristics correctly annotated by computer-aided detection software but ignored by reporting radiologists during CT colonography. Radiology 2009; 253:715–723.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Chakraborty DP. Analysis of location specific observer performance data: validated extensions of the jackknife free-response (JAFROC) method. Acad Radiol. 2006;13:1187–1893.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kenji Suzuki
    • 1
  • Abraham H. Dachman
  1. 1.Department of Radiology, Graduate Program in Medical Physics, and Comprehensive Cancer Center, Division of the Biological SciencesThe University of ChicagoChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations