Research Method: Grounded Theory for Descriptive and Exploratory Case Studies
Both Case Study and Grounded Theory methods are still minority research methodologies in information systems. A search of research papers published in higher tier information systems journalsa between 1985 and 2005 showed that only 120 out of 7,372 articles were concerned with case study research. Case methods are, however, well established in organizational research and have become increasingly more accepted in information systems research too (for examples see Benbasat et al., 1987; Galliers et al., 1987; Yin, 1989; Lee, 1989a, b; Orlikowski et al., 1991; Zinatelli et al., 1994). In particular, Eisenhardt (1989) describes a process of building theory from cases, focusing especially on its inductive nature.
- Denzin, N. K. 1994 The art and politics of interpretation. In: Denzin, N. K., Lincoln, Y. S. (eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA, 500–515.Google Scholar
- Yoong, S. P. 1996. A grounded theory of reflective facilitation: Making the transition from traditional to GSS facilitation. Unpublished Doctoral Thesis at the Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand, 10–295.Google Scholar
- Lehmann, H. P., Gallupe, R. B. 2005. Information systems for multinational enterprises – Some factors at work in their design and implementation, Journal of International Management, 11(4), 28–49.Google Scholar
- Fernandez, W. D., Lehmann, H. P. 2005. Achieving Rigour And Relevance In Information Systems Studies – Using grounded theory to investigate organsational cases. Grounded Theory Review, 5(1), 23–40.Google Scholar
- Stern, P. N. 1994. Grounded theory methodology: Its uses and processes. In: Glaser, B. G. (ed.), More Grounded Theory Methodology: A Reader. Sociology Press, Mill Valley, CA, 102–123.Google Scholar