Advertisement

Epilog: The Effective Practice of School Consultation

  • William P. Erchul
  • Brian K. Martens
Chapter
Part of the Issues in Clinical Child Psychology book series (ICCP)

Abstract

In the 1970s, P.L. 94-142/IDEA wrote into law many of the remedies handed down in previous court cases regarding special education services. The major provisions of IDEA were to guarantee children: (a) the right to a free, appropriate public education; (b) assessment in all areas related to their suspected disability using nondiscriminatory practices; (c) long-term goals and short-term objectives specified in an individualized education program (IEP); (d) due process protections in all matters of identification, evaluation, and placement; (e) access to related services; and (f) education in the least restrictive environment.

Keywords

Special Education Special Education Service Regular Education Individualize Education Program Eligibility Determination 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Daly, E. J., Martens, B. K., Barnett, D., Witt, J. C., & Olson, S. C. (2007). Varying intervention delivery in response-to-intervention: Confronting and resolving challenges with measurement, instruction, and intensity. School Psychology Review, 36, 562-581.Google Scholar
  2. Kavale, K. (1990). Effectiveness of special education. In T. B. Gutkin & C. R. Reynolds (Eds.), Handbook of school psychology (2nd ed., pp. 868-898). New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
  3. Martens, B. K., & Ardoin, S. P. (2010). Assessing disruptive behavior within a problem-solving model. In G. G. Peacock, R. A. Ervin, E. J. Daly, & K. W. Merrell (Eds.), Practical handbook in school psychology: Effective practices for the 21st century (pp. 157-174). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  4. Martens, B. K., & DiGennaro, F. D. (2008). Behavioral consultation. In W. P. Erchul & S. M. Sheridan (Eds.), Handbook of research in school consultation: Empirical foundations for the field (pp. 147-170). New York: Taylor & Francis Group/Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Reschly, D. J. (1988). Special education reform: School psychology revolution. School Psychology Review, 17, 459-475.Google Scholar
  6. Reschly, D. (2004). Paradigm shift, outcomes, criteria, and behavioral interventions: Foundations for the future of school psychology. School Psychology Review, 33, 408-416.Google Scholar
  7. Reschly, D. J. (2008). School psychology paradigm shift and beyond. In A. Thomas & J. Grimes (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology-V (pp. 3-16). Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.Google Scholar
  8. Vaughn, S., & Fuchs, L. S. (2003). Redefining learning disabilities as inadequate response to instruction: The promise and potential problems. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 18, 137-146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyNorth Carolina State UniversityRaleighUSA
  2. 2.Department of PsychologySyracuse UniversitySyracuseUSA

Personalised recommendations