Students as Clients

  • William P. Erchul
  • Brian K. Martens
Part of the Issues in Clinical Child Psychology book series (ICCP)


Each September, millions of children across the country return to their classrooms ready to begin another year of public schooling. The majority of these children will be successful in learning the material presented to them, will earn passing marks from their teacher, and will be promoted to the next grade level. For a certain proportion of children, however (approximately 11% nationwide; Reschly, 1988), the year at school will be a markedly different experience. Some of these children will lack the skills needed to tackle grade-level material, and as a result will struggle with even routine classroom assignments. Others will be unaccustomed to waiting patiently for the teacher’s attention or working quietly in their seat, and as a result will engage in behavior that disrupts others.


Special Education Curriculum Material Special Education Service Regular Education Specific Learning Disability 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Archer, R. P., Maruish, M., Imhof, E. A., & Piotrowski, C. (1992). Psychological test usage with adolescent clients: 1990 survey findings. Professional Psychology: Research & Practice, 22, 247-252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Armbruster, B. B., Stevens, R. J., & Rosenshine, B. (1977). Analyzing content coverage and emphasis: A study of three curricula and two tests. (Technical Report No 26). Urbana, IL: University of Illinois.Google Scholar
  3. Bell, P. F., Lentz, F. E., & Graden, J. L. (1992). Effects of curriculum-test overlap on standardized achievement test scores: Identifying systematic confounds in educational decision making. School Psychology Review, 21, 644-655.Google Scholar
  4. Brandenburg, N. A., Friedman, R. M., & Silver, S. E. (1990). The epidemiology of childhood psychiatric disorders: Recent prevalence findings and methodologic issues. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 29, 76-83.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Burns, M. K., & Senesac, B. V. (2005). Comparison of dual discrepancy criteria to assess response to intervention. Journal of School Psychology, 43, 393-406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cataldo, M. F., Kahng, S., DeLeon, I. G., Martens, B. K., Friman, P. C., & Cataldo, M. (2007). Behavioral principles, assessment, and therapy. In M. L. Batshaw, N. J. Roizen, & L. Pelligrino (Eds.), Children with Disabilities (6th ed., pp. 539-555). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.Google Scholar
  7. Daly, E. J., Martens, B. K., Barnett, D., Witt, J. C., & Olson, S. C. (2007). Varying intervention delivery in response-to-intervention: Confronting and resolving challenges with measurement, instruction, and intensity. School Psychology Review, 36, 562-581.Google Scholar
  8. Daly, E. J., Witt, J. C., Martens, B. K., & Dool, E. J. (1997). A model for conducting a functional analysis of academic performance problems. School Psychology Review, 26, 554-574.Google Scholar
  9. Drasgow, E., & Yell, M. L. (2001). Functional behavioral assessments: Legal requirements and challenges. School Psychology Review, 30, 239-251.Google Scholar
  10. DuPaul, G. D. (1992). How to assess attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder within school settings. School Psychology Quarterly, 7, 60-74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Epstein, M., Cullinan, D., & Sabatino, D. (1977). State definitions of behavior disorders. Journal of Special Education, 11, 417-425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Forness, S. R., & Knitzer, J. (1992). A new proposed definition and terminology to replace “Serious Emotional Disturbance” in individuals with disabilities education act. School Psychology Review, 21, 12-20.Google Scholar
  13. Fuchs, L. S., & Fuchs, D. (1986b). Linking assessment to instructional intervention: An overview. School Psychology Review, 15, 318-323.Google Scholar
  14. Gettinger, M. (1986). Issues and trends in academic engaged time of students. Special Services in the Schools, 2, 1-17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Good, R. H., & Salvia, J. (1988). Curriculum bias in published, norm-referenced reading tests: Demonstrable effects. School Psychology Review, 17, 51-60.Google Scholar
  16. Good, T. L. (1983). Classroom research: A decade of progress. Educational Psychologist, 18, 137-144.Google Scholar
  17. Gresham, F. M. (1985). Behavior disorder assessment: Conceptual, definitional, and practical considerations. School Psychology Review, 14, 495-509.Google Scholar
  18. Gresham, F. M. (2009). Using response to intervention for identification of specific learning disabilities. In A. Akin-Little, S. G. Little, M. A. Bray, & T. J. Kehle (Eds.), Behavioral interventions in schools: Evidence-based positive strategies (pp. 205-220). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gresham, F. M., & Gansle, K. A. (1992). Misguided assumptions of DSM-III-R: Implications for school psychological practice. School Psychology Quarterly, 7, 79-95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gresham, F. M., & Reschly, D. J. (1986). Social skills deficits and low peer acceptance of mainstreamed learning disabled children. Learning Disability Quarterly, 9, 23-32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Grossman, H. J. (1983). Classification in mental retardation. Washington, DC: American Association on Mental Deficiency.Google Scholar
  22. Jenkins, J. R., & Pany, D. (1978). Standardized achievement tests: How useful for special education? Exceptional Children, 44, 448-453.Google Scholar
  23. Kavale, K. (1990). Effectiveness of special education. In T. B. Gutkin & C. R. Reynolds (Eds.), Handbook of school psychology (2nd ed., pp. 868-898). New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
  24. Luiselli, J. K., Reed, D. D., & Martens, B. K. (in press). Academic problems. In M. Hersen & J.C. Thomas (Eds.), Handbook of Clinical Psychology Competencies (Volume III). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  25. Martens, B. K. (1993a). A behavioral approach to consultation. In J. E. Zins, T. R. Kratochwill, & S. N. Elliott (Eds.), Handbook of consultation services for children: Applications in educational and clinical settings (pp. 65-86). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  26. Martens, B. K. (1993b). A case against magical thinking in school-based intervention. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 4, 185-189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Martens, B. K. (1993c). Social labeling, precision of measurement, and problem solving: Key issues in the assessment of children’s emotional problems. School Psychology Review, 22, 308-312.Google Scholar
  28. Martens, B. K., Steele, E. S., Massie, D. R., & Diskin, M. T. (1995). Curriculum bias in standardized tests of reading decoding. Journal of School Psychology, 33, 287-296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Martens, B. K., & Witt, J. C. (2004). Competence, persistence, and success: The positive psychology of behavioral skill instruction. Psychology in the Schools, 41, 19-30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Merrell, K. W., & Shinn, M. R. (1990). Critical variables in the learning disabilities identification process. School Psychology Review, 19, 74-82.Google Scholar
  31. Motta, R. W., Little, S. G., & Tobin, M. I. (1993). The use and abuse of human figure drawings. School Psychology Quarterly, 8, 162-169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. New York State Education Department. (2009). Regulations of the Commissioner of Education. Albany, NY: The University of the State of New York.Google Scholar
  33. North Carolina Department of Public Instruction, Exceptional Children’s Division. (2007). Policies governing services for children with disabilities. Raleigh, NC: North Carolina Department of Public Instruction, Exceptional Children’s Division.Google Scholar
  34. Reschly, D. J. (1988). Special education reform: School psychology revolution. School Psychology Review, 17, 459-475.Google Scholar
  35. Reschly, D. (2004). Paradigm shift, outcomes, criteria, and behavioral interventions: Foundations for the future of school psychology. School Psychology Review, 33, 408-416.Google Scholar
  36. Reynolds, C. R. (1981). The fallacy of “Two years below grade level for age” as a diagnostic criterion for reading disorders. Journal of School Psychology, 19, 350-358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Rosenfield, S. (1992). Developing school-based consultation teams: A design for organizational change. School Psychology Quarterly, 7, 27-46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Shapiro, E. S., & Derr, T. F. (1987). An examination of overlap between reading curricula and standardized achievement tests. The Journal of Special Education, 21, 59-67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Shinn, M. R. (1986). Does anyone care what happens after the refer-test-place sequence: The systematic evaluation of special education program effectiveness. School Psychology Review, 15, 49-58.Google Scholar
  40. Shinn, M. R. (1989). Curriculum-based measurement: Assessing special children. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  41. Sirotnik, K. A. (1983). What you see is what you get - consistency, persistency, and mediocrity in classrooms. Harvard Educational Review, 53, 16-31.Google Scholar
  42. Telzrow, C. F. (1999). IDEA amendments of 1997: Promise or pitfall for special education reform? Journal of School Psychology, 37, 7-28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Ullmann, L. P., & Krasner, L. (1969). A psychological approach to abnormal behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  44. United States Department of Education. (1987). Ninth annual report to Congress on the implemention of the Education of the Handicapped Act (Vol. I). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Educational Series, Special Education Programs.Google Scholar
  45. Vaughn, S., & Fuchs, L. S. (2003). Redefining learning disabilities as inadequate response to instruction: The promise and potential problems. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 18, 137-146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Webster, R. E., McInnis, E. D., & Craver, L. (1986). Curriculum biasing effects in standardized and criterion-referenced reading achievement tests. Psychology in the Schools, 23, 205-213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Witt, J. C., & Martens, B. K. (1984). Adaptive behavior: Tests and assessment issues. School Psychology Review, 13, 478-484.Google Scholar
  48. Ysseldyke, J. E., Christenson, S. L., Thurlow, M. L., & Bakewell, D. (1989). Are different kinds of instructional tasks used by different categories of students in different settings? School Psychology Review, 18, 98-111.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyNorth Carolina State UniversityRaleighUSA
  2. 2.Department of PsychologySyracuse UniversitySyracuseUSA

Personalised recommendations