An Analysis of Design Strategies for Creating Educational Experiences in Virtual Environments

Chapter

Abstract

The focus of this chapter is to analyze and compare design methodologies used in developing video games and e-learning. The purpose of this comparative exploration is to discover design strategies that have the potential to improve the quality and effectiveness of e-learning courses. The comparative perspectives are drawn from recommended instructional design practices, video game design practices, and video game analysis and theory. This reevaluation of the design methodologies and assumptions used in e-learning design suggests that these approaches could benefit by incorporating the proven successful design methods used in game design to increase learner engagement. However, to do so successfully, requires a significant conceptual shift in how instructional designers conceive, organize, and treat e-learning content. The shift away from traditional e-learning design methods includes viewing the e-learning course as a potential virtual environment and adopting the methods inherent in game design which support experiential learning.

References

  1. Age of Empires. (1997). Ensemble Studios, Microsoft Game Studios.Google Scholar
  2. Apperley, T. H. (2006). Genre and game studies: Toward a critical approach to video game genres. Simulation & Gaming, 37(1), 6–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bejeweled. (2001). PopCap Games.Google Scholar
  4. Bogost, I. (2006). Unit operations: An approach to videogame criticism. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  5. Clark, R., & Mayer, R. E. (2007). E-learning and the science of instruction: Proven guidelines for consumers and designers of multimedia learning. San Francisco: Pfeiffer.Google Scholar
  6. Crawford, C. (1982). The art of computer game design. Retrieved 2008, from http://www.vancouver.wsu.edu/fac/peabody/game-book/Coverpage.html.Google Scholar
  7. Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  8. Everquest II. (2004). Sony Online Entertainment.Google Scholar
  9. Frasca, G. (2003). Simulation versus Narrative: Introduction to Ludology. In M. J. Wolf and B. Perron, (Eds.), Video game theory reader (pp. 221–235). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Gaber, J. (2007). Simulating planning: SimCity as a pedagogical tool. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 27(2), 113–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Galloway, A. R. (2006). Gaming: Essays on algorithmic culture. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  12. Gee, J. P. (2003). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  13. Gee, J. P. (2005). Learning by design: Good video games as learning machines. E-learning, 2(1), 5–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Guitar Hero. (2006). Activision.Google Scholar
  15. Juul, J. (2005). Half-real: Video games between real rules and fictional worlds. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  16. Neverwinter Nights: Shadows of Undrentide. (2003). Infogrames/Atari, MacSoft.Google Scholar
  17. Piskurich, G. M. (2000). Rapid Instructional design: Learning ID fast and right. San Francisco: Pfeiffer.Google Scholar
  18. Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. From On the Horizon, 9, 5.Google Scholar
  19. Prensky, M. (2003). Digital game-based learning. ACM Computers in En-tertainment, 1, 1–4.Google Scholar
  20. Prensky, M. (2008, November–December). The role of technology. Educational Technology. Retrieved January 2009, from http://www.marcprensky.com/writing/Prensky-The_Role_of_Technology-ET-11-12-08.pdf
  21. Rankin, Y., McNeal, M., Shute, M. W., & Gooch, B. (2008). User centered game design: Evaluating massive multiplayer online role playing games for second language acquisition. 2008 ACM SIGGRAPH symposium on Video games (pp. 43–49). Los Angeles, USA.Google Scholar
  22. Rock Band. (2007). Electronic Arts Studios.Google Scholar
  23. Rollings, A., & Adams, E. (2003). Andrew rollings and Ernest Adams on game design. Berkeley, CA: New Riders.Google Scholar
  24. Rollings, A., & Morris, D. (2004). Game architecture and design: A new edition. Indianapolis, IN: New Riders.Google Scholar
  25. Shaffer, D. W., Squire, K. R., Halverson, R., & Gee, J. P. (2004). Video games and the future of learning. Retrieved 2008, from Academic ADL Co-Lab: http://www.academiccolab.org/resources/gappspaper1.pdf.Google Scholar
  26. The Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion. (2006). Bethesda Game Studios, 2 K Games, Bethesda Softworks.Google Scholar
  27. The Sims. (2000). Electronic Arts.Google Scholar
  28. Trauma Center: Second Opinion. (2006). Atlus.Google Scholar
  29. Turkle, S. (1994). Construction and reconstructions of self in virtual re-ality: Playing in the MUDs. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 1(3), 158–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Warhammer Online. (2008). Electronic Arts.Google Scholar
  31. World of Warcraft. (2004). Blizzard Entertainment.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of WashingtonSeattleUSA

Personalised recommendations