Designing Online Learning Environments for Professional Development

  • Kedmon Hungwe


Internet-based technologies have expanded the range of options for teacher professional development. This chapter focuses on the design of online learning environments for teacher professional development. The empirical foundations of the work are based on online courses that the author has designed and taught to science teachers. The course participants have been practicing teachers with at least 2 years of experience. The theoretical foundations of the course design are grounded in assumptions about adult learners. Malcolm Knowles (The modern practice of adult education, 1980) identified several key characteristics of adult learners. Among them are the following: (1) adult learners are autonomous, self-directed, and strongly goal oriented; (2) adult learners have accumulated a foundation of life experiences and knowledge and have a need to connect learning to this knowledge and experience base; and (3) adult learners are practical and have a strong preference for learning that is most useful to their work. In addition to that, it has been recognized that teachers are usually isolated and have a professional need to interact and learn from fellow practitioners The new technologies afford opportunities for creating communities of practice among geographically dispersed practitioners (Fishman and Davis, The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences, 535–550, 2006).


Professional Development Distance Education Adult Learner Professional Development Program Teacher Learning 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Ball, D. L., & Cohen, D. K. (1999). Developing practice, developing practitioners: Toward a practice-based theory of professional education. In L. Darling-Hammond & G. Sykes (Eds.), Teaching as the learning profession (pp. 3–31). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  2. Berns, B. B., & Swanson, J. (2000). Middle school science: Working in a confused context. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA (Eric Document Reproduction Service No. ED444944).Google Scholar
  3. Borko, H. (2004). Professional development and teacher learning: Mapping the terrain. Educational Researcher, 33(8), 3–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Breivik, P. S., & Gee, E. G. (2006). Higher education in the internet age: Libraries creating a strategic edge. Westport, CT: Greenwood Publishing Group.Google Scholar
  5. Bruner, J. (1996). The culture of education. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Connolly, T., & Stansfield, M. (2006). Using games-based elearning technologies in overcoming difficulties in teaching information systems. Journal of Information Technology Education, 5, 459–476Google Scholar
  7. Dahl, J. (1984). Structured experience: A risk-free approach to reality-based learning. Journal of Nursing Education, 23(9), 34–37.Google Scholar
  8. Daniels, H. (2001). Vygotsky and pedagogy. New York: Routledge Falmer.Google Scholar
  9. Daniels, H. (2007). Pedagogy. In H. Daniels, M. Cole, & J. Wertsch (eds.), The Cambridge companion to Vygotsky (pp. 307–331). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Davis, K. (2003). “Change is hard”: What science teachers are telling us about reform and teacher learning of innovative practices. Science Education, 87, 3–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dewey, J. (1916). “Data and meanings”. Chapter 4. In Essays in experimental logic (pp. 136–156), Chicago: University of Chicago.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fishman, B. J., & Davis, E. A. (2006). Teacher learning research and the learning sciences. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 535–550). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Honeycutt, L. (1994). What hath Bakhtin wrought? Toward a unified theory of literature an composition. Master of Arts thesis. University of North Carolina at Charlotte. Accessed at:∼honeyl/bakhtin/thesis.htmlGoogle Scholar
  14. Horn, I. S. (2005). Learning on the job: A situated account of teacher learning in high school mathematics. Cognition and Instruction, 23, 207–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hungwe, K. (in press). Identity, self-interpretation and workplace change: An investigation of the work activity of machining. Journal of Adult Development.Google Scholar
  16. Johnson, C. C. (2006). Effective professional development and change in practice: Barriers science teachers encounter and implications for reform. School Science and Mathematics, 106, 150–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kelly, P. (2006). What is teacher learning? A socio-cultural perspective. Oxford Review of Education, 32, 505–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Knowles, M. (1978). The adult learner: A neglected species. Houston: Gulf Publishing.Google Scholar
  19. Knowles, M. S. (1980). The modern practice of adult education. Chicago: Association Press/Follett.Google Scholar
  20. Lederman, N. (1999). Teachers’ understanding of the nature of science and classroom practice: Factors that facilitate or impede the relationship. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 36, 916–929.Google Scholar
  21. Lindseth, A., & Norberg, A. (2004). A phenomenological hermeneutical method for researching lived experience. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 18, 145–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Litowitz, B. E. (1993). Deconstructing the zone of proximal development. In E. A. Forman, N. Minick, & C. A. Stone (Eds.), Contexts for learning (pp. 184–196). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  23. McGrath, S. (2008). Developing teachers and teaching. International Journal of Educational Development, 28, 1–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mitra, A., & Hall, A. (2002). Distance education as a discursive practice: Voice, discourse and pedagogy. In G. Richards (Ed.), Proceedings of World Conference on E-learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 2002 (pp. 2683–2684). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.Google Scholar
  25. Moll, L. C., & Whitmore, K. F. (1993). Vygotsky in classroom practice: Moving from individual transmission to social transaction. In E. Forman, N. Minick & C. Addison Stone (Eds.), Contexts for learning (pp. 19–42). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  26. National Research Council (1996). National Science Education Standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  27. National Research Council. (2000). Inquiry and the national science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  28. New Media Consortium & EDUCAUSE Learning Initiative (2009). The 2009 Horizon Report. New Media Consortium.
  29. Nichols, S. E., & Tobin, K. (2000). Discursive practice among teachers co-learning during field-based elementary science teacher preparation. Action in Teacher Education, 22, 45–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Nipper, S. (1989). Third generation distance learning and computer conferencing. In R. Mason & R. Kaye (Eds.), Mindweave: Communication, computers and distance education (pp. 53–73). Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar
  31. Packer, M. J. (1993). Away from internalization. In E. A. Forman, N. Minick, & C. A. Stone (Eds.), Contexts for learning (pp. 254–265). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Peressini, D. D., & Knuth, E. J. (1999). Why are you talking when you could be listening? The role of discourse and reflection in the professional development of a secondary mathematics teachers. Teaching and teacher education, 14, 107–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Prater, D. L., & MacNeil, A. J. (2002). The use of collaborative groups in traditional and online courses. In C. D. Maddux, J. Ewing-Taylor & D. LaMont Johnson (Eds.), Distance education: Issues and concerns, (pp. 67–76). Binghamton, New York: Howarth Press.Google Scholar
  34. Scott, P., Mortimer, E. F., & Aguiar, O. G. (2006). The tension between authoritative and dialogic discourse: A fundamental characteristic of meaning making interactions in high school science lessons. Science Education, 90, 605–631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Taylor, J. (2001). Fifth generation distance education. e-Journal of Instructional Science and Technology
  36. Van Maanen, J., & Schein, E. H. (1979). Toward a theory of organizational socialization. In B. M. Staw (Ed.), Research in organizational behavior (pp. 209–264). Greenwich, CT: JAI.Google Scholar
  37. Villegas-Reimers, E. (2003). Teacher professional development: An international review of the literature. Paris: UNESCO Institute for Educational Planning.Google Scholar
  38. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind and society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Vygotsky, L. S. (1987). Thinking and speech. In R. W. Rieber and A. S. Carton (Eds.), The collected works of L.S. Vygotsky, Volume 1: Problems of general psychology (Trans. N. Minick). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  40. Wallace, C. S., & Kang, N. (2004). An investigation of experienced secondary teachers’ beliefs about inquiry: An examination of competing belief sets. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 41, 936–960.Google Scholar
  41. Webster’s New Collegiate Dictionary (1973). Springfield, MA: G. & C. Merriam Company.Google Scholar
  42. Wee, B., Shepardson, D., Fast, J., & Harbor, J. (2007). Teaching and learning about inquiry: Insights and challenges in professional development. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 18, 63–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Wertsch, J. (1991). Voices of the mind. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Windschitl, M. (2004). Folk theories of “inquiry.” How pre-service teachers reproduce the discourse and practices of an atheoretical scientific method. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41, 481–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Michigan Technological UniversityHoughtonUSA

Personalised recommendations