Windows into Teaching and Learning Through Social Annotation Practices

  • Hope J. Hartman


Several applications of the HyLighter online social annotation system in undergraduate and graduate teacher education broaden and deepen instructional experiences for both students and the professor. Interactive reading and commentary on articles and case studies facilitate comprehension, memory and transfer as students learn from and with each other and the instructor. Collaborative concept mapping integrated with social annotation enables students to synthesize and link course concepts and materials reflecting the big picture of the course. Hypermedia-enhanced and collaboratively developed lesson plans provide an enriching, culminating, collaborative experience which integrates social annotation with course theories, online video and print resources and technology-enhanced, pedagogically sound lessons across the curriculum. These applications are conceptualized using several complementary theoretical frameworks, including Vygotsky’s concept of the Zone of Proximal Development where an online collaborative environment creates a virtual learning community which provides scaffolding so that learners reach higher levels of performance. These social annotation practices promote student and teacher metacognition in addition to meaningful learning and transfer. They also enable authentic assessments of student achievement. Students’ and teachers’ reflections on their own and others’ perspectives provide insights which improve both learning and instruction.


Critical Thinking Parenting Style Lesson Plan Meaningful Learning Authentic Assessment 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Baumrind, D. (1967). Child care practices anteceding three patterns of preschool behavior. Genetic Psychology Monographs, 75, 43–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baumrind, D. (1971). Principles of ethical conduct in the treatment of subjects: Reaction to the Draft Report of the Committee on Ethical Standards in Psychological Research. American Psychologist, 26, 887–896.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baumrind, D. (1991). The influence of parenting style on adolescent competence and substance use. Journal of Early Adolescence, 11(1), 56–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (1995). The Social Life of Documents. Resource Document. Accessed June 11, 2009.
  5. Bruner, J. (1966). Toward a theory of instruction. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
  6. Buchanan, C. M., Eccles, J. S. & Becker, J. B. (1992). Are adolescents the victims of raging hormones? Evidence of activational effects of hormones on moods and behavior at adolescence. Psychological Bulletin. 111, 62–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Crawford, G. B. (2008). Differentiation for the adolescent learner. Corwin Press: Thousand Oaks, CA.Google Scholar
  8. Dede, C. (2002). Designing and Studying Learning Experiences That Use Mulltiple Interactive Media to Bridge Distance and Time. Draft Chapter Prepared for: Charalambos Vrasidas and Gene V Glass, (Eds.). Current Perspectives on Applied Information Technologies. Vol. 1: Distance Education. Resource Document. Accessed July 30, 2009.
  9. Gardner, H. (1985). Frames of mind. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  10. Hartman, H. J. (2001a). Developing students’ metacognitive knowledge and skills. In H. J. Hartman (Ed.), Metacognition in learning and instruction: Theory, research and practice (pp. 33–68). The Netherlands: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  11. Hartman, H. J. (2001b). Teaching metacognitively. In H. J. Hartman (Ed.), Metacognition in learning and instruction: Theory, research and practice (pp. 149–172). The Netherlands: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  12. Hartman, H. J. (2009). A guide to reflective practice for new and experienced teachers. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  13. Hartman, H. J., & Sternberg, R. J. (1993). A broad BACEIS for improving thinking. Instructional Science: An International Journal of Learning and Cognition, 21(5), 401–425.Google Scholar
  14. King, R. A. (2002). Adolescence. In M. Lewis (Ed.) Child and adolescent psychiatry. (pp. 332–342). Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.Google Scholar
  15. Kowalski, T. J., Weaver, R. A., & Henson, K. T. (1994). Case studies of beginning teachers. White Plains, NY: Longman.Google Scholar
  16. Lebow, D. G., & Lick, D. W. (2004). Integration of HyLighter with Concept Mapping Software. Unpublished Manuscript. Tallahassee, FL.Google Scholar
  17. Lebow, D. G., Lick, D. W., & Hartman, H. J. (2003/2004). HyLighter and interactive annotation: New technology to develop higher-order thinking skills. Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Curriculum, XXIII(1 & 2), 69–79.Google Scholar
  18. Lebow, D. G., Lick, D. W., & Hartman, H. J. (2008). New technology for empowering virtual communities. In M. Pagain (Ed.)., Encyclopedia of multimedia technology and networking (2nd ed., pp. 1066–1071). Information Science Reference. Hershey, PA: IGI Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lefoe, G. (1998). Creating Constructivist Learning Environments on the Web: The Challenge in Higher Education. Resource Document. ASCILITE Accessed June 18, 2009.
  20. National Research Council (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience and school. Expanded Edition. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  21. Novak, J. D. (1998). Learning, creating and using knowledge. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  22. Piaget, J. (1971). Science of education and the psychology of the child. New York: Viking Press.Google Scholar
  23. Piaget, J. (1973). To understand is to invent: The future of education. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
  24. Price, L. (2005). The biology of risk taking. Educational Leadership, 62(7), 22–26.Google Scholar
  25. Sternberg, R. J. (1985). Beyond IQ: A triarchic theory of human intelligence. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of EducationThe City College of New YorkNew YorkUSA
  2. 2.Educational Psychology ProgramCity University of New York Graduate CenterNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations