Advertisement

Global Environmental Engagement

Chapter

Abstract

The failure of national governments to adequately address global environmental problems, such as climate change and biological diversity loss, has stimulated the emergence of third sector actors as new prominent and critical players at the transnational political level. This chapter reviews some of the scholarly analysis of third sector involvement in global environmental politics. It explores the academic debate on the role which a specific third sector actor – the scientific community – has played in defining the nature and scale of global environmental change. It investigates third sector interactions within the political arena both with nation-states and with non-state actors including international organizations and corporations. The chapter outlines the internal challenges facing third sector actors seeking to influence global environmental politics, particularly concerns about their legitimacy and accountability, and concludes with an exploration of the challenges facing both third sector actors and scholars analyzing these actors in supporting the creation of sustainable futures.

Keywords

Global Environmental Change Sector Actor African Union Epistemic Community International Financial Institution 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Alcock, F. (2005). Conflicts and coalitions within and across the ENGO community. Paper presented to Berlin Conference on the Human Dimensions of Global Environmental Change, Potsdam, Germany.Google Scholar
  2. Andonova, L. B., Betsill, M. M., and Bulkeley, H. (2009). Transnational climate governance. Global Environmental Politics, 9(2), 52–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anheier, H. K. (2000). Managing non-profit organisations: Towards a new approach. Civil Society Working paper, Centre for Civil Society, London School of Economics.Google Scholar
  4. Anheier, H. K. (2007). Reflections on the concept and measurement of global civil society. Voluntas, 18(1), 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Anheier, H. K., and Themudo, N. (2001). Organisational forms of global civil society: Implications of going global. In H. K. Anheier, M. Glasius, and M. Kaldor (eds) Global Civil Society 2002 (pp. 191–216), London, London School of Economics.Google Scholar
  6. Armstrong, C. (2006). Global civil society and the question of global citizenship. Voluntas, 17(4), 349–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Arts, B., Noortmann, M., and Reinalda, B. (eds) (2001). Non-State Actors in International Relations, Aldershot, UK, Ashgate.Google Scholar
  8. Batliwala, S. (2002). Grassroots movements as transnational actors: Implications for global civil society. Voluntas, 13(4), 393–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Batliwala, S., and Brown, L. D. (2006a). Introduction: Why transnational civil society matters. In S. Batliwala and L. D. Brown (eds) Transnational Civil Society: An Introduction (pp. 1–14), Bloomfield, CT, Kumarian Press.Google Scholar
  10. Batliwala, S., and Brown, L. D. (2006b). Shaping the global human project: The nature and impact of transnational civil activism. In S. Batliwala and L. D. Brown (eds) Transnational Civil Society: An Introduction (pp. 204–227), Bloomfield, CT, Kumarian Press.Google Scholar
  11. Benford, R. D., and Snow, D. A. (2000). Framing processes and social movements: An overview and assessment. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 611–639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Biermann, F., Siebenhüner, B., and Schreyögg, A. (eds) (2009). International Organizations in Global Environmental Governance, London, Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. Bloodgood, E. A. (2002). Influential information: Non-governmental organizations’ role in foreign policy-making and international regime formation. Unpublished paper, Department of Politics, Princeton University.Google Scholar
  14. Brown, L. D., and Moore, M. H. (2001). Accountability, strategy, and international non-governmental organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 30(3), 569–587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Brown, L. D., Moore, M. H., and Honan, J. (2003). Building strategic accountability systems for International NGOs. AccountAbility Forum, 2, Summer, 31–43.Google Scholar
  16. Brown, L. D., and Timmer, V. J. (2006). Civil society actors as catalysts for transnational social learning. Voluntas, 17(1), 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Brulle, R. J. (2000). Agency, Democracy and Nature: The US Environmental Movement from a Critical Theory Perspective, Cambridge, MA, The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  18. Caldwell, L. K. (1990). Between Two Worlds: Science, the Environmental Movement, and Policy Choice, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Carmin, J., and Balser, D. B. (2002). Selecting repertoires of action in environmental movement organizations. Organization and Environment, 15(4), 365–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Clark, J. (2003a). Worlds Apart: Civil Society and the Battle for Ethical Globalization, Bloomfield, CT, Kumarian Press.Google Scholar
  21. Clark, J. D. (ed.) (2003b). Globalizing Civic Engagement: Civil Society and Transnational Action, London, Earthscan.Google Scholar
  22. Clark, W. C. (2000). Environmental globalization. In J. S. Nye, Jr., and J. D. Donahue (eds) Governance in a Globalizing World (pp. 86–108), Washington, DC, Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
  23. Clark, W. C., Cruzten, P. J., and Schellnhuber, H. J. (2005). Science for global sustainability: Toward a new paradigm. CID Working paper no. 120, Science, Environment and Development Group, Center for International Development, Harvard University.Google Scholar
  24. Clark, W. C., Jäger, J., and van Eijndhoven, J. (2001). Managing global environmental change: An introduction to the volume. In The Social Learning Group (eds) Learning to Manage Global Environmental Risks (pp. 1–19), Cambridge, MA, The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  25. Cohen, R., and Rai, S. M. (2000). Global Social Movements, London, The Athlone Press.Google Scholar
  26. Berkes, F., Folke, C., and Colding, J. (eds) (1998). Linking Social and Ecological Systems: Management Practices and Social Mechanisms for Building Resilience, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Corell, E., and Betsill, M. M. (2001). A comparative look at NGO influence in international environmental negotiations: Desertification and climate change. Global Environmental Politics, 1(4), 86–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Covey, J., and Brown, L. D. (2001). Critical cooperation: An alternative form of civil society–business engagement. IDR Reports 17(1) [Boston, Institute for Development Research].Google Scholar
  29. Crutzen, P. J. (2002). Geology of mankind. Nature, 415(3), 23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Dalton, R. J. (1994). The Green Rainbow: Environmental Groups in Western Europe, New Haven, Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Dauvergne, P. (1997). Shadows in the Forest: Japan and the Politics of Timber in Southeast Asia, Cambridge, MA, The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  32. Dauvergne, P. (2008). The Shadows of Consumption: Consequences for the Global Environment, Cambridge, MA, The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  33. Diani, M., and Donati, P. R. (1999). Organizational change in Western European environmental groups: A framework for analysis. Environmental Politics, 8(1), 13–34.Google Scholar
  34. Dryzek, J. S. (1997). The Politics of the Earth: Environmental Discourses, Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Dryzek, J. S., Downs, D., Hernes, H.-K., and Schlosberg, D. (2003). Green States and Social Movements: Environmentalism in the United States, United Kingdom, Germany and Norway, Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Ebrahim, A. (2003). NGOs and Organizational Change: Discourse, Reporting and Learning, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Edwards, M. (2000). NGO Rights and Responsibilities: A New Deal for Global Governance, London, The Foreign Policy Centre.Google Scholar
  38. Finnemore, M. (1996). Constructing norms of humanitarian intervention. In P. J. Katzenstein (ed.) The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity (pp. 153–185), New York, Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Florini, A. (ed.) (2000). The Third Force: The Rise of Transnational Civil Society, Washington, DC, Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
  40. Fox, J. A., and Brown, L. D. (1998). The Struggle for Accountability: The World Bank, NGOs, and Grassroots Movements, Cambridge, MA, The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  41. Freeman, J. H. (1979). Resource mobilization and strategy: A model for analyzing social movement organization actions. In M. N. Zald and J. D. McCarthy (eds) The Dynamics of Social Movements (pp. 172–175), Cambridge, MA, Winthrop.Google Scholar
  42. Gerlach, L. P., and Hine, V. H. (1970). People, Power, Change: Movements of Social Transformation, Indianapolis, IN, Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
  43. Gereffi, G., Garcia-Johnson, R., and Sasser, E. (2001). The NGO–industrial complex, Foreign Policy, July/August, 56–65.Google Scholar
  44. Goertz, G., and Diehl, P. F. (1992). Toward a theory of international norms: Some conceptual and measurement issues. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 36(4), 634–664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Goffman, I. (1974). Frame Analysis, New York, Harper Colophon.Google Scholar
  46. Gordenker, L., and Weiss, T. G. (1995). NGO participation in the international policy process. Third World Quarterly, 16(3), 543–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Grant, W. (2000). Pressure Groups in British Politics, Basingstoke, Macmillan.Google Scholar
  48. Guay, T., Doh, J. P., and Sinclair, G. (2004). Non-governmental organizations, shareholder activism, and socially responsible investments: Ethical, strategic, and governance implications. Journal of Business Ethics, 52(1), 125–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Haas, P. M. (1992). Introduction: Epistemic communities and international policy coordination. International Organization, 46(1), 1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Haines, H. H. (1984). Black radicalism and the funding of civil rights: 1957–1970. Social Problems, 32(1), 31–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Harrison, K., and Sundstrom, L. M. (2007). The comparative politics of climate change. Global Environmental Politics, 7(4), 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Hawken, P. (2007). Blessed Unrest: How the Largest Movement in the World Came into Being and Why No One Saw It Coming, New York, Viking.Google Scholar
  53. Hochstetler, K. (2002). After the boomerang: Environmental movements and politics in the La Plata River basin. Global Environmental Politics, 2(4), 35–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Hoffman, A. J. (2001). From Heresy to Dogma: An Institutional History of Corporate Environmentalism, Stanford, CA, Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  55. Hurrell, A. (2003). Norms and ethics in international relations. In W. Carlsnaes, T. Risse, and B. A. Simmons (eds) Handbook of International Relations (pp. 137–154), London, Sage.Google Scholar
  56. Jasanoff, S. (2005). Designs on Nature: Science and Democracy in Europe and the United States, Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  57. Kates, R. W., Parris, T. M., and Leiserowitz, A. A. (2005). What is sustainable development? Goals, indicators, values and practice. Environment, 47(3), 9–21.Google Scholar
  58. Kearns, K. P. (1996). Managing for Accountability: Preserving the Public Trust in Public and Nonprofit Organizations, San Francisco, Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  59. Keck, M., and Sikkink, K. (1998). Activists Beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics, Ithaca, NY, Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  60. Khagram, S., Sikkink, K., and Riker, J. V. (eds) (2002). Restructuring World Politics: Transnational Social Movements, Networks, and Norms, Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  61. Klandermans, B. (1997). The Social Psychology of Protest, Cambridge, Blackwell.Google Scholar
  62. Levy, M. A., Young, O. R., and Zürn, M. (1995). The study of international regimes. European Journal of International Relations, 1(3), 267–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Lindenberg, M., and Bryant, C. (2001). Going Global: Transforming Relief and Development NGOs, Bloomfield, CT, Kumarian Press.Google Scholar
  64. Lindenberg, M., and Dobel, P. (1999). The challenges of globalization for northern international relief and developments NGOs. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 28(4), 4–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Lipschutz, R. D. (1996). Global Civil Society and Global Environmental Governance, Albany, State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  66. Lloyd, R. (2005). The Role of NGO Self-Regulation in Increasing Stakeholder Accountability, London, One World Trust.Google Scholar
  67. Lofland, J. (1996). Social Movement Organizations: Guide to Research on Insurgent Realities, New York, Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  68. McAdam, D. (1996). The framing function of movement tactics: Strategic dramaturgy in the American civil rights movement. In D. McAdam, J. D. McCarthy, and M. N. Zald (eds) Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements (pp. 339–340), Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  69. McAdam, D., and Scott, R. W. (2005). Organizations and movements. In G. F. Davis, D. McAdam, R. W. Scott, and M. N. Zald (eds) Social Movements and Organization Theory (pp. 4–40), Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Meyer, W. B. (2001). Human impacts on Earth. In A. S. Goudie and D. J. Cuff (eds) Encyclopedia of Global Change: Environmental Change and Human Society (pp. 607–613), Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  71. Meadowcroft, J. (2000). Sustainable development: A new(ish) idea for a new century? Political Studies, 48(2), 370–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Mercier, J. (1997). Downstream and Upstream Ecologists: The People, Organizations, and Ideas behind the Movement, Westport, CT, Praeger Publishers.Google Scholar
  73. McCarthy, J. D., Smith, J., and Zald, M. N. (1996). Media discourse, movement publicity, and the generation of collective action frames: Theoretical and empirical exercises in meaning construction. In D. McAdam, J. D. McCarthy, and M. N. Zald (eds) Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements (pp. 312–337), Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  74. McCarthy, J. D., and Zald, M. N. (2001). Resource mobilization theory: Vigorous or outmoded? In J. H. Turner (ed.) Handbook of Sociological Theory (pp. 533–565), New York, Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.Google Scholar
  75. Munck, R. (2006). Global civil society: Royal road or slippery path? Voluntas, 17(4), 325–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Najam, A. (2005). Developing countries and global environmental governance: From contestation to participation to engagement. International Environmental Agreements, 5(3), 303–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. National Research Council. (1999). Our Common Journey: A Transition towards Sustainability, Washington, DC, National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  78. Nelson, P. J. (1997). Deliberation, leverage or coercion? The World Bank, NGOs, and global environmental politics. Journal of Peace Research, 34(4), 467–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Newell, P. (2008). Civil society, corporate accountability and the politics of climate change. Global Environmental Politics, 8(3), 122–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Oldfield, J. D., and Shaw, D. J. B. (2006). V. I. Vernadsky and the nöosphere concept: Russian understandings of society–nature interaction. Geoforum, 37(1), 145–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. O’Rourke, D. (2005). Market movements: Nongovernmental organization strategies to influence global production and consumption. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 9(1/2), 115–128.Google Scholar
  82. Park, S. (2005). How transnational environmental advocacy networks socialize international financial institutions: A case study of the International Finance Corporation. Global Environmental Politics, 5(4), 95–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Porter, G., Brown, J. W., and Chasek, P. S. (2000). Global Environmental Politics, 3rd edn, Boulder, CO, Westview Press.Google Scholar
  84. Princen, T., and Finger, M. (1994). Environmental NGOs in World Politics: Linking the Local and the Global, London, Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Putnam, R. (1988). Diplomacy and domestic politics: The logic of two-level games. International Organization, 42, Summer, 427–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Rees, W. E. (1995). Achieving sustainability: Reform or transformation? Journal of Planning Literature, 9(4), 343–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Rees, W. E. (2009). Human nature, eco-footprints and environmental injustice. Local Environments, 13(8), 685–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Richards, J. P., and Heard, J. (2005). European environmental NGOs: Issues, resources and strategies in marine campaigns. Environmental Politics, 14(1), 23–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Risse, T. (2003). Transnational actors and world politics. In W. Carlsnaes, T. Risse, and B. A. Simmons (eds) Handbook of International Relations (pp. 255–274), London, Sage.Google Scholar
  90. Risse, T., Ropp, C., and Sikkink, K. (eds) (1999). The Power of Human Rights: International Norms and Domestic Change, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  91. Rootes, C. (2002). Global visions: Global civil society and the lessons of European environmentalism. Voluntas, 13(4), 411–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Ru, J., and Ortolano, L. (2009). Development of citizen-organized environmental NGOs in China. Voluntas, 20(2), 141–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Ruddiman, W. F. (2003). The anthropogenic greenhouse era began thousands of years ago. Climatic Change, 61(33), 261–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Rucht, D. (1999). The transnationalization of social movements: Trends, causes, problems. In D. della Porta, H. Kriesi, and D. Rucht (eds) Social Movements in a Globalizing World (pp. 206–222), London, Macmillan.Google Scholar
  95. Schreurs, M. A., Clark, W. C., Dickson, N. M., and Jäger, J. (2001). Issue attention, framing and actors: An analysis of patterns across arenas. In The Social Learning Group (eds) Learning to Manage Global Environmental Risks (pp. 349–364), Cambridge, MA, The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  96. Scholte, J. A. (2004). Democratizing the global economy: The role of civil society. Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation, University of Warwick.Google Scholar
  97. Selin, H., and Linnér, B. (2005). The quest for global sustainability: International efforts on linking environment and development. Center for International Development, Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University.Google Scholar
  98. Selle, P., and Strømsnes, K. (1998). Organized environmentalists: Democracy as a key value? Voluntas, 9(4), 319–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Smith, J. (2002). Bridging global divides. International Sociology, 17(4), 505–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Smith, J. (2005). Globalization and transnational social movement organizations. In G. F. Davis, D. McAdam, R. W. Scott, and M. N. Zald (eds) Social Movements and Organization Theory (pp. 226–248), Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Smith, J., Chatfield, C., and Pagnucco, R. (eds) (1997). Transnational Social Movements and Global Politics: Solidarity Beyond the State, Syracuse, NY, Syracuse University Press.Google Scholar
  102. Smith, J., Pagnucco, R., and Romeril, W. (1994). Transnational social movement organizations in the global political arena, Voluntas, 5(2), 121–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Social Learning Group (eds) (2001). Learning to Manage Global Environmental Risks: A Comparative History of Social Responses to Climate Change, Ozone Depletion and Acid Rain (2 volumes), Cambridge, MA, The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  104. Steffen, W. L., Sanderson, A., Tyson, P. D., Jäger, J., Matson, P., Moore III, B., Oldfield, F., Richardson, K., Schellnhuber, H. J., Turner II, B. L., and Wasson, R. J. (2004). Global Change and the Earth System: A Planet under Pressure, Heidelberg, Springer.Google Scholar
  105. Tarrow, S. (1995). Cycles of collective action: Between moments of madness and the repertoires of contention. In M. Traugott (ed.) Repertoires and Cycles of Collective Action (pp. 89–116), Durham, NC, Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  106. Tarrow, S. (1996). Fishnets, Internets, and Catnets: Globalization and transnational collective action. Estudio working paper 1996/78, Cornell University.Google Scholar
  107. Tarrow, S. (1998). Power in Movement: Social Movements, Collective Action and Politics, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  108. Taylor, R. (2002). Interpreting global civil society. Voluntas, 13(4), 339–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Tilly, C. (1978). From Mobilization to Revolution, Reading, MA, Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  110. Timmer, V. (2009). Agility and resilience: Adaptive capacity in Friends of the Earth International and Greenpeace. In F. Biermann, B. Siebenhüner, and A. Schreyögg (eds) International Organizations in Global Environmental Governance (pp. 244–263), London, Routledge.Google Scholar
  111. Torrance, W. E. F., and Torrance, A. W. (2006). Spinning the green web: Transnational environmentalism. In S. Batliwala and L. D. Brown (eds) Transnational Civil Society: An Introduction (pp. 101–123), Bloomfield, CT, Kumarian Press.Google Scholar
  112. Turner II, B. L., Clark, W. C., Kates, R. W., Richards, J. F., Mathews, J. T., and Meyer, W. B. (eds) (1990). The Earth as Transformed by Human Action: Global and Regional Changes in the Biosphere over the Past 300 Years, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  113. Turner II, B. L., Kasperson, R. E., Matson, P. A., McCarthy, J. J., Corell, R. W., Christensen, L., Eckley, N., Kasperson, J. X., Luers, A., Martello, M. L., Polsky, C., Pulsipher, A., and Schiller, A. (2003). A framework for vulnerability analysis in sustainability science. PNAS: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 100(14), 8074–8079.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. Van der Heijden, H. A. (1997). Political opportunity structures and the institutionalization of the environmental movement. Environmental Politics, 6(4), 25–50.Google Scholar
  115. Van der Heijden, H. A. (2006). Globalization, environmental movements and international political opportunity structures. Organization and Environment, 19(1), 28–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. Van Eijndhoven, J., Clark, W. C., and Jäger, J. (2001). The long-term development of global environmental risk management: Conclusions and implications for the future. In Social Learning Group (eds) Learning to Manage Global Environmental Risks, Vol. 2 (pp. 181–197), Cambridge, MA, The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  117. Vernadsky, V. I. (1998). The Biosphere, New York, Copernicus.Google Scholar
  118. Wapner, P. (1996). Environmental Activism and World Civic Politics, Albany, State University of New York.Google Scholar
  119. Wapner, P. (2002). Horizontal politics: Transnational environmental activism and global cultural change. Global Environmental Politics, 2(2), 37–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. WCED. (1987). Our Common Future: Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development, Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  121. Winston, M. (2002). NGO strategies for promoting corporate social responsibility. Ethics and International Affairs, 16(1), 71–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  122. Yanacopulos, H. (2005). The strategies that bind: NGO coalitions and their influence. Global Networks, 5(1), 93–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. Yearley, S. (1996). Sociology, Environmentalism, Globalization: Reinventing the Globe, London, Sage.Google Scholar
  124. Young, O. R. (ed.) (1997). Global Governance: Drawing Insights from the Environmental Experience, Cambridge, MA, The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  125. Zald, M. N., and Ash, R. (1966). Social movement organizations: Growth, decay and change. Social Forces, 44, March, 327–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada

Personalised recommendations