Human Ecology pp 195-211 | Cite as

Labor Productivity and Agricultural Development: Testing Boserup



It seems fair to say that in the Neolithic age, every household was involved in food production, but during industrial times, only a very small proportion of households (<10%) were involved in farming and feeding everyone. Food producing went from being the activity of everyone to being a sector of the economy employing few people and at the same time producing a large agricultural surplus that is exported to the rest of the economy. This is often called agricultural development, and the process by which this development has been accomplished is often referred to as intensification. There are two positions on what has happened to the productivity of labor in this developmental process: the rise thesis and the decline thesis.


Technology Package Labor Productivity Total Factor Productivity Agricultural Development Labor Input 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Barker R, Herdt RW, Rose B. 1985. The Rice Economy of Asia. Washington D.C., Resources for the Future.Google Scholar
  2. Barlett PF. 1976. “Labor efficiency and the mechanism of agricultural evolution.” Journal of Anthropological Research 32:124-140.Google Scholar
  3. Bender B. 1975. Farming in prehistory. From hunter-gatherer to food producer. London, John BakerGoogle Scholar
  4. Boserup E. 1965. The conditions of agricultural growth. Chicago, AldineGoogle Scholar
  5. Boserup E. 1981. Population and Technical Change: A Study of Long-Term Trends. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  6. Bray F. The Rice Economies: Technology and Development in Asian Societies. Oxford, Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  7. Bronson B. 1972. “Farm labor and the evolution of food production.” In Population growth Spooner, B (ed), pp 190-218. Cambridge Mass, The MIT PressGoogle Scholar
  8. Brookfield HC. 1972. “Intensification and disintensification in Pacific agriculture.” Pacific Viewpoint 13:30-48.Google Scholar
  9. Brookfield HC. 1984. “Intensification revisited.” Pacific Viewpoint 25:15-44.Google Scholar
  10. Brush S, Turner BL II. 1987. “The nature of farming systems and views of their change.” In Comparative Farming Systems. Edited by Turner and Brush, pp 11-48. New York, The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  11. Buck JL. 1937. Land Utilization in China. Nanking, University of Nanking. Second printing, New York, Paragon Book Reprint Corp.Google Scholar
  12. Campbell D, Stanley J. 1963. Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Boston, Houghton- MifflinGoogle Scholar
  13. Carneiro R. 1961. “Slash-and-burn cultivation among the Kuikuru and its implications for cultural development in the Amazon,” in The Evolution of horticultural systems in native North America. Edited by J. Wilbert, pp 47-67. Sociedad de Ciencias Naturales La Salle Caracas, Editorial SucreGoogle Scholar
  14. Carneiro R. 1979. “Tree felling with the stone ax: an experiment,” In Experimental Archaeology. Edited by C. Kramer, pp 21-58. New York, Columbia University PressGoogle Scholar
  15. Clarke WC. 1966. From extensive to intensive cultivation: a succession from New Guinea. Ethnology 5:347-359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cohen M. 1977. The food crisis in prehistory. New Haven, Yale University PressGoogle Scholar
  17. Cohen M. 1989. Health and the rise of civilization. New Haven, Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Conelly WT. 1992. “Agricultural intensification in a Philippine frontier community: Impact on labor efficiency and farm diversity.” Human Ecology 20:203-223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Conklin HC. 1957. Hanunoo agriculture: A report on an integral system of shifting cultivation in the Philippines. Rome, FAO (Reprinted 1975, Elliot’s Books, Northford Ct.)Google Scholar
  20. Conklin H. 1980. Ethnographic atlas of Ifugao. New Haven, Yale University PressGoogle Scholar
  21. Couty P. 1991. L’agriculture africaine en reserve. Reflexions sur l’innovation et l’intensification en afrique tropicale. Cahiers d’Etudes Africaines 32:65-81Google Scholar
  22. Dalton G. 1960. A note of clarification on economic surplus. American Anthropologist 62:483-490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Delvert J. 1961. Le Paysan Cambodgien. Paris, Mouton.Google Scholar
  24. Dove M. 1983. Theories of swidden agriculture, and the political economy of ignorance. Agroforestry Systems 1:85-99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Dumond D. 1961. Swidden agriculture and the rise of Maya civilization. Southwestern Journal of Anthropology 17:301-316.Google Scholar
  26. Durrenberger EP. 1978. Agricultural production and household budgets in a Shan peasant village in Northwestern Thailand: A quantitative description. Papers in International Studies, Southeast Asia Studies No. 49. Athens OH, Ohio University, Center for International StudiesGoogle Scholar
  27. Durrenberger EP. 1979. Rice production in a Lisu village. Journal of Southeast Asian Studies 10:139-145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Eder JF. 1977. Agricultural intensification and the returns to labour in the Philippine swidden system. Pacific Viewpoint 18:1-21Google Scholar
  29. Ellen R. 1982. Environment, subsistence and system. The ecology of small-scale social formations. Cambridge, Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  30. Freeman D. 1955. Iban agriculture. A report on the shifting cultivation of hill rice by the Iban of Sarawak. Colonial Office, Colonial Research Studies No. 18 London, Her Majesty’s Stationery OfficeGoogle Scholar
  31. Geddes WR. 1954. The Land Dayaks of Sarawak. London, Her Majesty’s Stationery OfficeGoogle Scholar
  32. Geertz C. 1963. Agricultural involution. Berkeley, University of California PressGoogle Scholar
  33. Gourou P. 1936. Les paysans du delta Tonkinois. Paris, Les Editions d’Art et d’HistoireGoogle Scholar
  34. Gourou P. 1956. “The quality of land use of tropical cultivators. In Man’s role in changing the face of the earth. Edited by WL Thomas, pp 336-349. Chicago, University of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar
  35. Grigg D. 1974. The agricultural systems of the world. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Grigg D. 1978. Ester Boserup’s theory of agrarian change: a critical review. Progress in Human Geography 3:64-84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Griliches Z. 1968. Agricultural productivity and technology. International encyclopaedia of the social sciences 1:241-5Google Scholar
  38. Gross DR. 1984. Time allocation: a tool for the study of cultural behavior. Annual review of anthropology 13:519-58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hanks LR. 1972. Rice and man. Chicago, AldineGoogle Scholar
  40. Harris DR. 1972. “Swidden systems and settlement”. In Man settlement and urbanism. Edited by P.J. Ucko, R. Tringham and G.W. Dimbleby, pp. London, DuckworthGoogle Scholar
  41. Harris M. 1959. The economy has no surplus? American Anthropologist 61:185-200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Harris M. 1971. Culture, man, and nature. New York, Thomas Y. Crowell Co.Google Scholar
  43. Hayami, Y, Ruttan V. 1986. Agricultural development: An international perspective, 2nd ed. Baltimore, Johns Hopkins University PressGoogle Scholar
  44. Huke RE. 1982a. Agroclimatic and dry season maps of south, southeast, and east Asia. Los Banos, IRRIGoogle Scholar
  45. Huke RE. 1982b. Rice area by type of culture: South, Southeast, and East Asia. Los Banos, IRRIGoogle Scholar
  46. Hunt RC. 1995. “Agrarian data sets: the comparativist’s view”. In The comparative analysis of human societies, Edited by Emilio Moran, pp 173-189. Boulder CO, Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
  47. Janlekha K. 1955. A study of the economy of a rice growing village in central Thailand. Bangkok, Ministry of Agriculture, Division of Agricultural EconomicsGoogle Scholar
  48. Kirch PV. 1994. The wet and the dry: Irrigation and agricultural intensification in Polynesia. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  49. Kunstadter P, Chapman EC, Sabhasri S. 1978. Farmers in the forest: economic development and marginal agriculture in northern Thailand. East-West Center. Honolulu, University Press of HawaiiGoogle Scholar
  50. Leach ER. 1949. Some aspects of dry rice cultivation in North Burma and Borneo. The advancement of science VI, no 21, p 27Google Scholar
  51. Leach ER. 1961. Pul Eliya. Cambridge, Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  52. Levang P. 1993. “Jachere arboree et culture sur brulis dans les iles l’archipel Indonesien”. In La Jachere en Afrique de l’Ouest. Edited by C. Floret et G. Serpantie, pp 179-192. Paris, ORSTOMGoogle Scholar
  53. Livi-Bacci, M. 1992. A concise history of world population. Cambridge MA, Blackwell’sGoogle Scholar
  54. Maclachlan M. 1983. And they did not starve: biocultural adaptation in a south Indian village. Philadelphia, ISHI PressGoogle Scholar
  55. Milleville P, Serpantie G. 1994. Dynamiques agraires et problematique de l’intensification de l’agriculture en Afrique soudano-Sahelienne. Comptes rendu acad agric Francaise 80(8):149-161Google Scholar
  56. Moerman M. 1968. Agricultural change and peasant choice in a Thai village. Berkeley, University of California PressGoogle Scholar
  57. Naroll R. 1962. Data quality control - a new research technique: prolegomena to a cross-cultural study of culture stress. New York, The Free PressGoogle Scholar
  58. Netting RMcC. 1977. Cultural ecology. Menlo Park, CA., Cummings.Google Scholar
  59. Netting RMcC. 1993. Smallholders, householders: farm families and the ecology of intensive, sustainable agriculture. Stanford, Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  60. Orans M. 1966. Surplus. Human Organization 25:24-32Google Scholar
  61. Padoch C. 1985. “Labor efficiency and intensity of land use in rice production: An example from Kalimantan.” Human Ecology 13:271-289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Pearson H. 1957. “The economy has no surplus. Critique of a theory of Development. In Trade and market in the early empires. Edited by K Polanyi, C Arensberg and H Pearson, pp 320-341. Glencoe, IL, The Free PressGoogle Scholar
  63. Pryor FL. 1977. The origins of the economy: a comparative study of distribution in primitive and peasant economies. New York, Academic PressGoogle Scholar
  64. Reid A. 1988. Southeast Asia in the age of commerce 1450-1680: the lands below the winds. New Haven, Yale University PressGoogle Scholar
  65. Rostow WW. 1960. The stages of economic growth: a non- communist manifesto. Cambridge, Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  66. Sahlins MD. 1968b. Tribesmen. Englewood Cliffs, N.J., Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  67. Salisbury R. 1962. From stone to steel: economic consequences of a technological change in New Guinea London, Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  68. Sanders W, Nichols D. 1988. Ecological theory and cultural evolution in the Valley of Oaxaca. Current Anthropology 29:33-80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Sevin O. 1982. Les Dayak du centre Kalimantan. Etude geographique du pays Ngaju, de la Seruyan a la Kahayu Travaux et Documents de ORSTOM, no. 163. Paris, ORSTOMGoogle Scholar
  70. Smith A. 1776. The wealth of nations. 1976 edition. Chicago, University of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar
  71. Spooner B (ed). 1972. Population growth. Cambridge MASS, The MIT PressGoogle Scholar
  72. Toth N, Clark D, Ligabue G. 1992. “The last stone ax makers.” Scientific American July 1992, pp 88-93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Turner BL II, Hanham RO, Portararo AV. 1977. Population pressure and agricultural intensity. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 67(3):384-396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Turner BL, Doolittle W. 1978. The concept and measure of agricultural intensity. Professional Geographer 30:297-301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Ucko PJ, Tringham R, Dimbleby GW. (eds). 1972. Man, settlement and urbanism. London, DuckworthGoogle Scholar
  76. Waddell J. 1972. The mound builders. Seattle, University of Washington PressGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of AnthropologyBrandeis UniversityWalthamUSA

Personalised recommendations