Advertisement

Model9: Styles in Relationships

  • Luciano L’Abate
  • Mario Cusinato
  • Eleonora Maino
  • Walter Colesso
  • Claudia Scilletta
Chapter

Abstract

The unconscious and the semiconscious nature of the likeness continuum model (Model8) described in the previous chapter renders it impossible for it to be measured unless it is elicited with relevant instruments, such as the Likeness Continuum Task (Andersen, Reznick, & Glassman, 2005; Bargh, 2007; Hassin, Uleman, & Bargh, 2005). However, it is possible to observe and evaluate how the likeness continuum is exhibited by three styles in intimate relationships by relying on the dialectical nature of that continuum. At a more visible and, therefore, measurable level, Model9 combines dialectically related symbiosis with alienation to yield abusive–apathetic (AA) and neglectful relational styles. Combining sameness with oppositeness yields reactive–repetitive (RR) relational styles. Combining similarity with differentness yields creative–conductive (CC) relational styles (L’Abate, 1983). AA styles are the most dysfunctional styles; RR styles are intermediate along a continuum of functionality; CC styles are the most functional styles. RR styles include cluster C disorders on the internalizing side and cluster B disorders on the externalizing side (Aalsma & Lapsley, 2001; Cunningham, Shamblen, Barbee, & Ault, 2005; Orner & Stolz, 2002). The most dysfunctional AA styles includes axis I disorders, cluster A of axis II, and coexisting disorders, such as addictions, physical, verbal, and sexual abuse, and extreme criminalities overlapping with psychopathological disorders. Derivations from these six conditions lead to a variety of dependencies with various outcomes, as included in Fig. 11.1.

Keywords

Sexual Abuse Intimate Relationship Physical Violence Corrective Feedback Previous Chapter 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Aalsma, M., & Lapsley, D. (2001). A typology of adolescent delinquency: Sex differences and implications for treatment. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health, 11(3), 173–191.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andersen, S. M., Reznick, I., & Glassman, N. S. (2005). The unconscious relational self. In R. R. Hassin, J. S. Uleman, & J. A. Bargh (Eds.), The new unconscious (pp. 421–481). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bargh, J. A. (Ed.). (2007). Social psychology and the unconscious: The automaticity of higher mental processes. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  4. Colesso, W. (2006). Questionario dello Stile Genitoriale Percepito (QSRPG) [Perceived Parental Style Questionnaire, QSRPG]. Famiglia, Interdisciplinarità, Ricerca, 11, 159–171.Google Scholar
  5. Cunningham, M. R., Shamblen, S. R., Barbee, A. P., & Ault, L. K. (2005). Social allergies in romantic relationships: Behavioral repetition, emotional sensitization, and dissatisfaction in dating couples. Personal Relationships, 12, 273–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cusinato, M., & Colesso, W. (2007). Creazione e validazione di un modello di atteggiamenti childfree [Creation and validation of a childfree attitude model]. Rivista di Studi Familiari, 12, 82–96.Google Scholar
  7. Cusinato, M., & Colesso, W. (2008). Validation of the continuum of likeness in intimate relationships. In L. L’Abate (Ed.), Toward a science of clinical psychology: Laboratory evaluations and interventions (pp. 337–352). Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science Publishers.Google Scholar
  8. Harkness, A. R. (2007). Personality traits are essential for a complete clinical science. In S. O. Lilienfeld & W. T. O’Donohue (Eds.), The great ideas of clinical science: 17 principles that every mental health professional should understand (pp. 263–290). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Hassin, R. R., Uleman, J. S., & Bargh, J. A. (Eds.). (2005). The new unconscious. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  10. L’Abate, L. (1983). Styles in intimate relationships: The A-R-C model. The Personnel and Guidance Journal, 63, 227–283.Google Scholar
  11. L’Abate, L. (2005). Personality in intimate relationships: Socialization and psychopathology. New York: Springer Science.Google Scholar
  12. L’Abate, L. (2008a). A hierarchical framework for relational competence theory. Psychologia Rozwojowa, 13, 9–19.Google Scholar
  13. L’Abate, L. (2008b). Appendix. A proposed curriculum for a diploma or graduate degree in Structured Online Mental Health Interventions. In L. L’Abate (Ed.), Toward a science of clinical psychology: Laboratory evaluations and interventions (pp. 385–392). New York: Nova Science Publishers.Google Scholar
  14. L’Abate, L. (2008c). Applications of relational competence theory to prevention and psychotherapy. In K. Jordan (Ed.), The quick theory reference guide: A resource for expert and novice mental health professionals (pp. 475–492). New York: Nova Science Publishers.Google Scholar
  15. L’Abate, L. (2008d). Proposal for including distance writing in couple therapy. Journal of Relationship & Couple Therapy, 7, 337–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. L’Abate, L. (2008e). What is the laboratory method in clinical psychology? In L. L’Abate (Ed.), Toward a science of clinical psychology: Laboratory evaluations and interventions (pp. 1–34). New York: Nova Science Publishers.Google Scholar
  17. L’Abate, L. (in press-c). Paradigms, theories, and models: Two hierarchical frameworks. In L. L’Abate, M. Capitelli, P. De Giacomo, & S. Longo (Eds.), Science, mind, and creativity: The Bari Symposium. New York: Nova Science Publishers.Google Scholar
  18. L’Abate, L., & De Giacomo, P. (2003). Intimate relationships and how to improve them: Integrating theoretical models with preventive and psychotherapeutic applications. Newport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
  19. Matthews, G., Deary, I. J., & Whiteman, M. C. (2003). Personality traits (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. McMahan, O., & L’Abate, L. (2001). Programmed distance writing with seminarian couples. In L. L’Abate (Ed.), Distance writing and computer-assisted interventions in psychiatry and mental health (pp. 137–156). Westport, CT: Ablex.Google Scholar
  21. Norton, R. W. (1988). Communicator style theory in marital interaction: Persistent challenges. In S. Duck (Ed.), Handbook of personal relationships: Theory, research and interventions (pp. 307–324). New York: Wiley. p. 311.Google Scholar
  22. Orner, R. J., & Stolz, P. (2002). Making sense of repetition phenomena by integrating psychotraumatology and psychodynamic psychotherapy. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 15, 465–471.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Post, S. G. (Ed.). (2007). Altruism and health: Perspectives from empirical research. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Tellegen, A. (1988). The analysis of consistency in personality assessment. Journal of Personality, 56, 621–663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Wolfe, D. A., Jaffe, P. G., Jette, J. L., & Poisson, S. E. (2003). The impact of child abuse in community institutions and organizations: Advancing professional and scientific understanding. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 10, 179–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Luciano L’Abate
    • 1
  • Mario Cusinato
    • 2
  • Eleonora Maino
    • 3
  • Walter Colesso
    • 2
  • Claudia Scilletta
    • 4
  1. 1.Georgia State UniversityAtlantaUSA
  2. 2.University of PaduaPaduaItaly
  3. 3.Scientific Institute Eugenio MedeaBosisio PariniItaly
  4. 4.MilanoItaly

Personalised recommendations