Advertisement

Twelve Theses on Design Science Research in Information Systems

  • Juhani Iivari
Chapter
Part of the Integrated Series in Information Systems book series (ISIS, volume 22)

Abstract

This essay discusses 12 theses for guiding design science research. They are aimed at strengthening the design science orientation of Information Systems, clarifying future discourses on design science research aspects of the discipline, and giving some further guidelines for design science research in Information Systems.

Keywords

Information System Design Theory Technology Acceptance Model Design Science Empirical Regularity 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Avison, D. E. and A. T. Wood-Harper (1991) Information systems development research: an exploration of ideas in practice, The Computer Journal 34 (2), pp. 98–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baskerville, R. (2008) What design science is not, European Journal of Information Systems 17, pp. 441–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bazerman, M. H. (2005) Conducting influential research: the need for prescriptive implications, Academy of Management Review 30 (1), pp. 25–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beckman, S. (2002) The nature of artifacts, in Dahlbom, B., Beckman, S. and Nilsson, G. B., Artifacts and Artificial Science, Almqvist & Wiksell International, Stockholm, pp. 45–92.Google Scholar
  5. Benbasat, I. (1985) An analysis of research methodologies, in The Information Systems Research Challenge, McFarlan, F. W. ed., Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA, pp. 47–85.Google Scholar
  6. Benbasat, I. and R. Weber (1996) Rethinking diversity in information systems research, Information Systems Research 7 (4), pp. 389–399.Google Scholar
  7. Benbasat, I. and R. W. Zmud (2003) The identity crisis within the discipline: defining and communicating the discipline’s core properties, MIS Quarterly 27 (2), pp. 183–194.Google Scholar
  8. Berger, P. and T. Luckman (1967) The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise on Sociology of Knowledge, Doubleday, New York, NY.Google Scholar
  9. Bjerknes, G., P. Ehn, and M. Kyng (eds.) (1987) Computers and Democracy, Avebury, Aldershot.Google Scholar
  10. Bunge, M. (1967a) Scientific Research I, The Search for System, Springer-Verlag, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bunge, M. (1967b) Scientific Research II. The Search for Truth, Springer-Verlag, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chen, W. and R. Hirschheim (2004) A paradigmatic and methodological examination of information systems research from 1991 to 2001, Information Systems Journal 14 (3), pp. 197–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chmielewicz, K. (1970) Forschungskonzeptionen der Wirtschaftswissenschaft, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
  14. Chua, W. F. (1986) Radical developments in accounting thought, The Accounting Review, LXI (5), pp. 583–598.Google Scholar
  15. Clemmensen, T. (2006) Whatever happened to the psychology of human–computer interaction? A biography of the life of a psychological framework within a HCI journal, Information Technology & People 19 (2), pp. 121–151.Google Scholar
  16. Couger, J. D., L. F. Higgins, and S. C. Mcintyre (1993) (Un)structured creativity in information systems organizations, MIS Quarterly 17 (4), pp. 375–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cross, N. (1993) Science and design methodology, Research in Engineering Design 5, pp. 63–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cross, N. (2001) Designerly ways of knowing: design discipline versus design science, Design Issues 17 (3), pp. 49–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Davis, F. D., R. P. Bagozzi, and P. R. Warshaw (1989) User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models, Management Science 35 (8), pp. 982–1003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dubin, R. (1969) Theory Building, The Free Press, New York.Google Scholar
  21. Galliers, R. D. and F. F. Land (1987) Choosing appropriate information systems research methodologies, Communications of the ACM 30 (11), pp. 900–902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gardner, P. L. (1994) The relationship between technology and science: some historical and philosophical reflections. Part I, International Journal of Technology and Design Education 4 (2), pp. 123–153.Google Scholar
  23. Gardner, P. L. (1995) The relationship between technology and science: some historical and philosophical reflections. Part II, International Journal of Technology and Design Education 5 (1), pp. 1–33.Google Scholar
  24. Gregor, S. (2006) The nature of theory in information systems, MIS Quarterly 30 (3), pp. 611–642.Google Scholar
  25. Gregor, S. (2008) Building theory in a practical science, in Information Systems Foundations: Answering the Unanswered Questions About Design Research, The 4 th ANU Workshop on Information Systems Foundations, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia.Google Scholar
  26. Gregor, S. and D. Jones (2007) The anatomy of a design theory, Journal of the AIS 8 (5), pp. 312–335.Google Scholar
  27. Hassan, N. R. (2006) Is information systems a discipline? A Foucauldian and Toulminian analysis, in Proceedings of the Twenty-Seventh International Conference on Information Systems, Milwaukee, pp. 425–440.Google Scholar
  28. Hevner, A. R., S. T. March, J. Park, and S. Ram (2004) Design science in information systems research, MIS Quarterly 28 (1), pp. 75–105.Google Scholar
  29. Iivari, J. (1991) A paradigmatic analysis of contemporary schools of IS development, European Journal of Information Systems 1 (4), pp. 249–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Iivari, J. (2007) Paradigmatic analysis of information systems as a design science, Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems 19 (2), pp. 39–63.Google Scholar
  31. Jenkins, A. M. (1985) Research methodologies and MIS research, in Mumford, E., Hirschheim, R., Fitzgerald, G. and Wood-Harper, A.T. (eds.), Research Methods in Information Systems, North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 103–117.Google Scholar
  32. King, J. L. and K. Lyytinen (2004) Reach and grasp, MIS Quarterly 28 (4), pp. 539–551.Google Scholar
  33. Kuechler, W. and V. Viashnavi (2008) The emergence of design research in information systems in North America, Journal of Design Research 7 (1), pp. 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Layton, E. T. Jr. (1974) Technology as knowledge, Technology and Culture 15, pp. 31–41.Google Scholar
  35. Lehtovuori, J. (1973) Liiketaloustieteen metodologista taustaa, Turun kauppakorkeakoulun julkaisuja, AI-6.Google Scholar
  36. Lyytinen K. and J. L. King (2004) Nothing at the center? Academic legitimacy in the information systems field, Journal of the AIS 5 (6), pp. 220–246.Google Scholar
  37. Lyytinen, K. and G. M. Rose (2003) The disruptive nature of information technology innovations: the case of Internet computing in systems development organizations, MIS Quarterly 27 (4), pp. 557–595.Google Scholar
  38. March, S. T. and G. F. Smith (1995) Design and natural science research on information technology, Decision Support Systems 15, pp. 251–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Markus, M. L., A. Majchrzak, and L. Gasser (2002) A design theory for systems that support emergent knowledge processes, MIS Quarterly 26 (3), pp. 179–212.Google Scholar
  40. McKay, J. and P. Marshall, P. (2007) Science, design, and design science: seeking clarity to move design science research forward in information systems, in Proceedings of the Eighteenth Autsralasian Conference on Information Systems, pp. 604–614.Google Scholar
  41. McKay, J., P. Marshall, and G. Heath (2008) An exploration of the concept of design in information systems, in Information Systems Foundations: Answering the Unanswered Questions About Design Research, The 4 th ANU Workshop on Information Systems Foundations, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia.Google Scholar
  42. Niiniluoto, I. (1993) The aim and structure of applied research, Erkenntnis 38, pp. 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Niiniluoto, I. (1999) Critical Scientific Realism, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  44. Nunamaker, J. F., M. Chen, and T. D. M. Purdin (1990–1991) System development in information systems research, Journal of Management Information Systems 7 (3), pp. 99–106.Google Scholar
  45. Orlikowski, W. J. and C. S. Iacono (2001) Research commentary: desperately seeking the “IT” in IT research – a call theorizing the IT artifact, Information Systems Research 12 (2), pp. 121–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Pitt, J. C. (2000) Thinking about Technology, Foundations of the Philosophy of Technology, Seven Bridges Press, New York, NY.Google Scholar
  47. Popper, K. (1978) Three Worlds, The Tanner Lectures on Human Values, Delivered at the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar
  48. Rogers, E. M. (1995) Diffusion of Innovations, 4th edn., The Free Press, New York.Google Scholar
  49. Simon, H. (1969/1981/1996) The Sciences of Artificial, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  50. Strasser, S. (1985) Understanding and Explanation Basic Ideas Concerning the Humanity of the Human Sciences, Duquesne University Press, Pittsburg, PA.Google Scholar
  51. Swanson, B. (1994) Information systems innovation among organizations, Management Science 40 (9), pp. 1069–1092.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. van Aken, J. E. (2004) Management research based on the paradigm of design sciences: the quest for field-tested and grounded technological rules, Journal of Management Studies 41 (2), pp. 219–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. van Aken, J. E. (2005) Valid knowledge for the professional design of of large and complex design processes, Design Studies 26, pp. 379–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Venkatesh, V., M. G. Morris, G. B. Davis, and F. D. Davis (2003) User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view, MIS Quarterly, 27 (3), pp. 425–478.Google Scholar
  55. Verschuren, P. and R. Hartog (2005) Evaluation in design-oriented research, Quality & Quantity 39, pp. 733–762.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. von Hippel, E. (1988) The Sources of Innovation, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  57. von Hippel, E. (2005) Democratizing Innovation, The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  58. Walls, J., G. R. Widmeyer, and O. A. El Sawy (1992) Building an information system design theory for vigilant EIS, Information Systems Research 3 (1), pp. 36–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Winter, R. (2008) Design science research in Europe, European Journal of Information Systems 17, pp. 470–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag US 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of OuluOuluFinland

Personalised recommendations