Design Science Research in Information Systems: A Critical Realist Approach

Part of the Integrated Series in Information Systems book series (ISIS, volume 22)


Information systems (IS) research has serious utilization and relevance problems. To increase IS research utilization and relevance, scholars argue that the dominating behavioral IS research paradigm should be complemented with IS design science research. The most influential IS design science research schools have a strong focus on the IT artifact, in most cases an exclusive focus on the IT artifact. The schools have very little discussions and clarifications regarding underpinning philosophies, but most seem to be based on positivism, traditional realism, or pragmatism. This chapter presents, as a complement to the most influential design science research schools, an alternative approach for IS design science research. The approach builds on the premise that one of the most critical aims of IS design science research is to develop practical knowledge for the design and realization of different classes of IS initiatives, where IS are viewed as socio-technical systems and not just IT artifacts. The underpinning philosophy of the approach is critical realism which has been developed as an alternative to positivism and traditional realism as well as to constructivism (relativism). The developed practical IS design knowledge can be represented in different forms, for example, as heuristic design propositions, design exemplars and patterns, models or frameworks, and stories or narratives. The IS design knowledge can be developed using different methods and techniques. The chapter presents how practical IS design knowledge can be developed as well as the nature of the developed knowledge.


Information System Design Theory Design Knowledge Critical Realism Knowledge Management System 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



I would like to thank Omar El Sawy and Pertti Järvinen for a number of valuable design science research discussions over the years. For my ideas I owe a lot to my co-researchers and co-authors Stefan Henningsson, Stefan Hrastinski, and Christina Keller.


  1. Accenture (2002). Getting Information Technology Right Is Key to M&A Successes, Accenture.Google Scholar
  2. Accenture (2006) Executives Report that Mergers and Acquisitions Fail to Create Adequate Value, Accenture.Google Scholar
  3. Ackroyd, S. and S. Fleetwood (eds.) (2000) Realist Perspectives on Management and Organisations, Routledge, London.Google Scholar
  4. Agarwal, R. and H. C. Lucas (2005) The information systems identity crisis: focusing on high-visibility and high-impact research, MIS Quarterly 29 (3), pp. 381–398.Google Scholar
  5. Alter, S. (2003) 18 Reasons why IT-reliant work systems should replace “the IT artifact” as the core subject matter of the IS field, Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 12, Article 23.Google Scholar
  6. Alter, S. (2004) Desperately seeking systems thinking in the information systems discipline, in Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth International Conference on Information Systems,Washington, DC, USA, December 12–15, pp. 757–769.Google Scholar
  7. Archer, M. S. (1979) Social Origins of Educational Systems, Sage, London.Google Scholar
  8. Archer, M., R. Bhaskar, A. Collier, T. Lawson, and A. Norrie (eds.) (1998) Critical Realism: Essential Readings, Routledge, London.Google Scholar
  9. Arnott, D. and G. Pervan (2008) Eight key issues for the decision support systems discipline, Decision Support Systems 44, pp. 657–672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bendoly, E., and F. R. Jacobs (eds.) (2005) Strategic ERP Extension and Use, Stanford Business Books, Stanford, CA.Google Scholar
  11. Benbasat, I. and R. W. Zmud (2003) The identity crisis within the IS discipline: defining and communicating the discipline’s core properties, MIS Quarterly 27 (2), pp. 183–194.Google Scholar
  12. Bhaskar, R. (1975/1978) A Realist Theory of Science, Harvester Press, Sussex.Google Scholar
  13. Bhaskar, R. (1979/1998) The Possibility of Naturalism, 3rd edn., Routledge, London.Google Scholar
  14. Bhaskar, R. (1989) Reclaiming Reality, Verso, London.Google Scholar
  15. Bhaskar, R. (1991) Philosophy and the Idea of Freedom, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
  16. Bhaskar, R. (2002) From Science to Emancipation: Alienation and the Actuality of Enlightenment, Sage, New Delhi.Google Scholar
  17. Bloom, B. S. (1956) Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: Handbook 1, Cognitive Domain, Longman, New York.Google Scholar
  18. Bunge, M. (1967) Scientific Research II: The Search for Truth, Springer Verlag, Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Bunge, M. (1984) Philosophical inputs and outputs of technology, in G. Bugliarello and D. Donner (eds.) History and Philosophy of Technology, University of Illinois Press, Urbana, IL, pp. 263–281.Google Scholar
  20. Cao, J., J. M. Crews, M. Lin, A. Deokar, J. Burgoon, and J. F. Nunamaker (2006) Interactions between system evaluation and theory testing: a demonstration of the power of a multifaceted approach to information systems research, Journal of Management Information Systems 22 (4), pp. 207–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Carlsson, S. A. (2003) Advancing information systems evaluation (research): a critical realist approach, Electronic Journal of Information Systems Evaluation 6 (2), pp. 11–20.Google Scholar
  22. Carlsson, S. A. (2004) Using critical realism in IS research, in M. E. Whitman and A. B. Woszczynski (eds.), The Handbook of Information Systems Research, Idea Group Publishing, Hershey, PA, pp. 323–338.Google Scholar
  23. Carlsson, S. A. (2006) Towards an information systems design research framework: a critical realist perspective, in Proceedings of the First International Conference on Design Science in Information Systems and Technology (DESRIST 2006), Claremont Graduate University, Claremont, CA, February 24–25, pp. 192–212.Google Scholar
  24. Carlsson S. A. (2009) Critical realism, in Y. K. Dwivedi, B. Lal, M. D. Williams, S. L. Schneberger, and M. Wade (eds.) Handbook of Research on Contemporary Theoretical Models in Information Systems, IGI Global, Hershey, PA, pp. 57–76Google Scholar
  25. Carlsson, S. A. and T. Kalling (2006) Why is it that a knowledge management initiative works or fails, in Proceedings of the 14th European Conference on Information Systems, Gothenburg.Google Scholar
  26. Carlsson, S. A. and T. Kalling (2007) Implementation of a knowledge management initiative: turning kms use into profit, in Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Intellectual Capital, Knowledge Management and Organisational Learning (ICICKM), University Stellenbosch Business School, Cape Town, South Africa, October 15–16, 2007.Google Scholar
  27. Carlsson S. A., S. Henningsson, S. Hrastinski, and C. Keller (2008) Towards a design science research approach for IS use and management: applications from the areas of knowledge management, E-learning and IS integration, in Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Design Science Research in Information Systems & Technology (DESRIST 2008), May 7–9, Atlanta, GA.Google Scholar
  28. Carlsson S.A., S. Henningsson, S. Hrastinski and C. Keller (forthcoming): Socio-technical IS design science research: developing design theory for IS integration management, Information Systems and e-Business Management.Google Scholar
  29. Chen, W. and R. Hirschheim (2004) A paradigmatic and methodological examination of information systems research. Information Systems Journal 14 (3), pp. 197–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Cole, R. A. (2000) Introduction, in R. A. Cole (ed.) Issues in Web-Based Pedagogy: A Critical Primer, Greenwood Press, Westport, CT, pp. ix–xx.Google Scholar
  31. Cole, R., S. Purao, M. Rossi, and M. K. Sein (2005) Being proactive: where action research meets design research, in Proceedings of The Twenty-Sixth International Conference on Information Systems, Las vegas, NV, December 11–14.Google Scholar
  32. De Vaujany, F.-C. (2008) Capturing reflexivity modes in IS: a critical realist approach, Information and Organization 18, pp. 51–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Dean, K., J. Joseph, A. and Norrie (2005) Editorial: new essays in critical realism, New Formations 56, pp. 7–26.Google Scholar
  34. Dobson, P. J. (2001) The philosophy of critical realism—an opportunity for information systems research, Information Systems Frontier 3 (2), pp. 199–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Dobson, P., J. Myles, and P. Jackson (2007) Making the case for critical realism: examining the implementation of automated performance management systems, Information Resources Management Journal 20 (2), pp. 138–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Edwards, J. S., M. Handzic, S. Carlsson, and M. Nissen (2003) Knowledge management research & practice: visions and directions, Knowledge Management Research & Practice 1 (1), pp. 49–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. El Sawy, O. A. (2003) The 3 faces of IS identity: connection, immersion, and fusion, Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 12, Article 39.Google Scholar
  38. Fleetwood, S. (2002) Boylan and O’Gorman’s causal holism: a critical realist evaluation, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 26, pp. 27–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Fleetwood, S. (2004) An ontology for organisation and management studies, in S. Fleetwood and S. Ackroyd (eds.) Critical Realist Applications in Organisation and Management Studies, Routledge, London, pp. 27–53.Google Scholar
  40. Fleetwood, S. and S. Ackroyd (eds.) (2004) Critical Realist Applications in Organisation and Management Studies, Routledge, London.Google Scholar
  41. Gregor, S. (2006) The nature of theory in information systems, MIS Quarterly 30 (3), pp. 611–642.Google Scholar
  42. Gregor, S. (2009) Building theory in the sciences of the artificial, in Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Design Science in Information Systems and Technology (DESRIST 2009), May 7–8, Malvern, PA.Google Scholar
  43. Gregor, S. and D. Jones (2007) The anatomy of a design theory, Journal of the Association for Information Systems 8 (5), pp. 312–335.Google Scholar
  44. Groff, R. (2004) Critical Realism, Post-positivism and the Possibility of Knowledge, Routledge, London.Google Scholar
  45. Hartwig, M. (ed.) (2007) Dictionary of Critical Realism, Routledge, London.Google Scholar
  46. Hedström, P. and R. Swedberg (1998) Social mechanisms: an introductory essay, in P. Hedström and R. Swedberg (eds.) Social Mechanisms: An Analytical Approach to Social Theory, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Hevner, A. R., S. T. March, J. Park, and S. Ram (2004) Design science in information systems research, MIS Quarterly 28 (1), pp. 75–105.Google Scholar
  48. Hirschheim, R. and H. K. Klein (2003) Crisis in the IS field? A critical reflection on the state of the discipline, Journal of the Association for Information Systems 4 (5), pp. 237–293.Google Scholar
  49. Hrastinski, S. (2007) The potential of synchronous communication to enhance participation in online discussions, in Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Information Systems, Montreal.Google Scholar
  50. Hrastinski, S. and C. Keller (2007) Computer-mediated communication in education: a review of recent research, Educational Media International 44 (1), pp. 61–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Hrastinski, S., C. Keller and S.A. Carlsson (2007) Towards a design theory for synchronous computer-mediated communication in e-learning environments, in Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Design Science Research in Information Systems & Technology (DESRIST 2007), May 13–15, Pasadena, CA, pp. 208–224.Google Scholar
  52. Hrastinski, S., C. Keller, and S.A. Carlsson (forthcoming) Design exemplars for synchronous e-learning: a design theory approach. Computers & Education.Google Scholar
  53. Indulska, M. and J. C. Recker (2008) Design science in IS research: a literature analysis, in Proceedings of the 4th Biennial ANU Workshop on Information Systems Foundation, Canberra.Google Scholar
  54. Kazi, M. A. F. (2003) Realist Evaluation in Practice, Sage, London.Google Scholar
  55. Keller, C. (2007) Virtual Learning Environments in Higher Education – A Study of User Acceptance, Dissertation No. 1114, Linköping University, Linköping.Google Scholar
  56. Krueger, R. A. (1994) Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.Google Scholar
  57. Kuechler, W. and V. Vaishnavi (2008) The emergence of design research in information systems in North America, Journal of Design Research 7 (1), pp. 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Layder, D. (1993) New Strategies in Social Research, Polity Press, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
  59. Layder, D. (1998) Sociological Practice: Linking Theory and Social Research, Sage, London.Google Scholar
  60. Layder, D. (2005) Understanding Social Theory, 2nd edn, Sage, London.Google Scholar
  61. Longshore Smith, M. (2005) Overcoming Theory–practice Inconsistencies: Critical Realism and Information Systems Research, WP134, Department of Information Systems, London School of Economics, London.Google Scholar
  62. Lòpez, J. and G. Potter (eds.) (2001) After Postmodernism: An Introduction to Critical Realism, Athlone, London.Google Scholar
  63. Luftman, J., R. Kempaiah, and E. Henrique (2009) Key issues for IT executives, MIS Quarterly Executive 8(3), pp. 151–159.Google Scholar
  64. Lyytinen, K. (2008) Design: “shaping in the wild”, Key Note Speech at the Third International Conference on Design Science Research in Information Systems and Technology, Atlanta, GA.Google Scholar
  65. March, S. T. (2006) Designing design science, in J. L. King and K. Lyytinen (eds.) Information Systems: The State of the Field, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, pp. 338–344.Google Scholar
  66. March, S. T. and G. Smith (1995) Design and natural science research on information technology, Decision Support Systems 15 (4), pp. 251–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Marton, F., L. O. Dahlgren, L. Svensson, R. and Säljö (1977) Inlärning och Omvärldsuppfattning: En Bok om den Studerande Människan, Almqvist & Wiksell, Stockholm.Google Scholar
  68. McKay, J. and P. Marshall (2005) A review of design science in information systems, in Proceedings of the 16th Australasian Conference on Information Systems, Sydney, November 29 to December 2, 2005.Google Scholar
  69. McKay, J. and P. Marshall (2007) Science, design, and design science: seeking clarity to move design science research forward in information systems, in Proceedings of the 18th Australasian Conference on Information Systems Science, Toowoomba, December 5–7, 2007.Google Scholar
  70. McKay, J. and P. Marshall (2008) Foundation of design science in Information Systems, Sparks working paper, RISO (Research into Information Systems in Organisations), Faculty of Information and Communication Technologies, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Australia.Google Scholar
  71. Mingers, J. (2003) A critique of statistical modelling from a critical realist perspective, in Proceedings of the 11th European Conference on Information Systems, Naples, June 16–21.Google Scholar
  72. Mingers, J. (2004) Re-establishing the real: critical realism and information systems, in J. Mingers and L. Willcocks (eds.) Social Theory and Philosophy for Information Systems Research, Wiley, Chichester, pp. 372–406.Google Scholar
  73. Morton, P. (2006) Using critical realism to explain strategic information systems planning, Journal of Information Theory and Application 8 (1), pp. 1–20.Google Scholar
  74. Mutch, A. (2002) Actors and networks or agents and structures: towards a realist view of information systems, Organizations 9 (3), pp. 477–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Myers, M. D. (2003) The IS core—VIII, defining the core properties of the IS discipline: not yet, not now, Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 12, Article 38.Google Scholar
  76. Nunamaker, J. F., M. Chen, and T. D. M. Purdin (1990–91) System development in information systems research, Journal of Management Information Systems 7 (3), pp. 99–106.Google Scholar
  77. Pawson, R. (2006) Evidence-Based Policy: A Realist Perspective, Sage, London.Google Scholar
  78. Pawson, R. and N. Tilley (1997). Realistic Evaluation, Sage, London.Google Scholar
  79. Pelz, D. S. (1978) Some expanded perspectives on the use of social science in public policy, in M. Yinger and S. J. Cutler (eds.) Major Social Issues: A Multidisciplinary View, Free Press, New York, pp. 346–357.Google Scholar
  80. Pfeffer, J. and R. I. Sutton (2006) Hard Facts, Dangerous Half-truths & Total Nonsense: Profiting from Evidence-based Management, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.Google Scholar
  81. Purao, S. (2002) Design Research in Technology and Information Systems: Truth or Dare, Unpublished paper, School of Information Sciences and Technology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, State College, PA.Google Scholar
  82. Robert, L. P. and A. R. Dennis (2005) Paradox of richness: a cognitive model of media choice, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication 48 (1), pp. 10–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Rodgers, M. (2005) Stay hungry, CIO Magazine.Google Scholar
  84. Rosemann, M. and I. Vessey (2008) Toward improving the relevance of information systems research to practice: the role of applicability checks, MIS Quarterly 32 (1), pp. 1–22.Google Scholar
  85. Sayer, A. (1984/1992) Method in Social Science: A Realist Approach, 2nd edn, Routledge, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Sayer, A. (2000) Realism and Social Science, Sage, London.Google Scholar
  87. Simon, H. A. (1988) The Sciences of the Artificial, 2nd edn, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  88. Smith, H. A. and McKeen, J. D. (2006) IT in 2010: the next frontier, MIS Quarterly Executive 5 (3), pp. 125–136.Google Scholar
  89. Stahl, B. R. (2008) Design as reification, commodification, and ideology: a critical review of IS design science, in Proceedings of the 16th European Conference on Information Systems, Galway.Google Scholar
  90. Trigg, M. (2001) Understanding Social Science: A Philosophical Introduction to the Social Sciences, 2nd edn, Blackwell, Malden, MA.Google Scholar
  91. Vaishnavi, V. and W. Kuechler (2004/5) Design Research in Information Systems, January 20, 2004, last updated June 29, 2007, URL: (Accessed: November 25, 2008).
  92. van Aken, J. E. (2004) Management research based on the paradigm of design sciences: the quest for field-tested and grounded technological rules, Journal of Management Studies 41 (2), pp. 219–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. van Aken, J. E. (2005) Management research as a design science: articulating the research products of mode 2 knowledge production in management, British Journal of Management 16 (1), pp. 19–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. van Aken, J. E. (2006) The Nature of Organizing Design: Both Like and Unlike Material Object Design, Working Paper 06.13, Eindhoven Centre for Innovation Studies, Technische Universiteit Eindhoven, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  95. Venable, J. R. (2006) The role of theory and theorising in design science research, in Proceedings of the First International Conference on Design Science in Information Systems and Technology (DESRIST 2006), pp. 1–18.Google Scholar
  96. Venkatesh, V., M. G. Morris, G. B. Davis, and F. D. Davis (2003) User Acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view, MIS Quarterly 27 (3), pp. 425–478.Google Scholar
  97. Volkoff, O., D. M. Strong, and M. B. Elmes (2007) Technological embeddedness and organizational change, Organization Science, 18 (5), pp. 832–848.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978) Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  99. Walls, J. G., G. R. Widmeyer, and O. A. El Sawy (1992) Building an information systems design theory for vigilant EIS, Information Systems Research 3 (1), pp. 36–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Walls, J. G., G. R. Widmeyer, and O. A. El Sawy (2004) Assessing information system design theory in perspective: how useful was our 1992 initial rendition? Journal of Information Technology Theory and Application 6 (2), pp. 43–58.Google Scholar
  101. Walt, S. M. (1999) Rigor or rigor mortis? Rational choice and security studies, International Security 23 (4), pp. 5–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Wenger, E. (1998) Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  103. Wilson, M. and A. Greenhill (2004) Theory and action for emancipation: elements of a critical realist approach, in B. Kaplan, Truex III, D. P. Wastell, A. T. Wood-Harper, and J. I. DeGross (eds.), Information Systems Research: Relevant Theory and Informed Practice, Kluwer, Norwell, MA, pp. 667–675.Google Scholar
  104. Wilson, V. and B. McCormack (2006) Critical realism as emancipatory action: the case for realistic evaluation in practice development, Nursing Philosophy 7, pp. 45–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Zwieg, P., K. M. Kaiser, C. M. Beath, C. Bullen, K. P. Gallagher, T. Goles, J. Howland, J. C. Simon, P. Abbott, T. Abraham, E. Carmel, R. Evaristo, S. Hawk, M. Lacity, M. Gallivan, S. Kelly, J. G. Mooney, C. Ranganathan, J. W. Rottman, T. Ryan, and R. Wion (2006) The information technology workforce: trends and implications 2005–2008, MIS Quarterly Executive 5 (2), pp. 101–108.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag US 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Economics and ManagementLund UniversityLundSweden

Personalised recommendations